ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2426

Comparison of Patient Self-Reported and Physician Reported Rheumatoid Arthritis  Medication Use – Results from the Ontario Best Practices Research Initiative

Binu Jacob1, Xiuying Li1, Angela Cesta2, Bindee Kuriya3, Edward Keystone4 and Claire Bombardier3, 1University Health Network, Toronto General Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Clinical Decision Making and Health Care, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Rheumatology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects (ACR): Impact of Various Interventions and Therapeutic Approaches

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose

Patient self-reported medication histories may be prone to misclassification and recall bias. We aimed to assess the agreement between patient (Pt) and physician (MD) reported medication use in a cohort of RA patients.

Methods

Patients enrolled in the Ontario Best Practices Research Initiative (OBRI), a clinical registry of RA patients followed in routine care, were included. Following patient consent, data were extracted from physician charts using a structured questionnaire on patient demographics, comorbidities, disease activity and use of RA medications.  Patients are assessed every 3 months through telephone interviews according to a standardized protocol to collect additional socio-economic characteristics, disease activities measures, and medication use. We examined the concordance of reporting medication names and the level of agreement between Pt and MD reported RA medications. RA medications (only DMARDs and BIOLOGICS) were categorized as (yes/no) for both self-reported and physician reported data and kappa statistics with 95% confidence intervals were computed at baseline and 12 month period to assess chance-corrected agreement between the two sources of data. Percent agreement was also calculated as a measure of agreement. In addition, dose reported for various drugs were compared at baseline and one year. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare the mean difference of doses reported.

Results

Of the 2347 patients included in the study, 77% of patients were female with a mean (SD) age of 57.4 (12.9) years, and the majority (85%) were Caucasian. Patients had moderate disease activity according to both mean (SD) DAS28 scores 4.5 (1.5) and CDAI scores 21(14). At baseline, substantial agreement was found between Pt and MD reported medication use (kappa =0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.77-0.79); agreement=97.4%), and use of specific BIOLOGIC and DMARDS with agreement ranged from 88 to 100% (Figure, kappa range 0.50-0.85). The degree of agreement was lowest for methotrexate (kappa=88%). The MD reported mean dose was significantly higher than Pt except for MTX. At one year, the overall agreement of reported medication name increased with kappa=0.84 (95% CI 0.83-0.85) and there was no significant difference in reported dose between Pt and MD.

Conclusion

Similar level of agreement between patients and physicians suggest that differential misclassification is unlikely in the reporting of RA medication use. Furthermore, the accurate reporting of doses at one year suggests that patient’s ability to report their medications improves over time.


Disclosure:

B. Jacob,
None;

X. Li,
None;

A. Cesta,
None;

B. Kuriya,
None;

E. Keystone,

Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer Sanofi-Aventis, UCB,

2,

Abbott Laboratories, AstraZeneca, Biotest, BMS, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Genentech, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Pfizer, UCB,

5,

Abbott, AstraZeneca, BMS Canada, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB, Amgen,

8;

C. Bombardier,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-patient-self-reported-and-physician-reported-rheumatoid-arthritis-medication-use-results-from-the-ontario-best-practices-research-initiative/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology