ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2202

Comparison of New and Old American College of Rheumatology Classification Criterion for Diagnosis of Fibromyalgia

Kenrin Shi1, Kenji Miki2 and Masao Yukioka3, 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yukioka Hospital, Osaka, Japan, 2Center for Pain Management, Osaka University Hospital, Suita, Japan, 3Orthopaedic Surgery, Yukioka hospital, Osaka, Japan

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: ACR, Diagnostic criteria and fibromyalgia

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Fibromyalgia, Soft Tissue Disorders, Regional and Specific Clinical Pain Syndromes - Poster II: Clinical Focus

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic disease characterized by severe, long lasting pain that spreads widely in almost whole body. The cause of the disease is still unknown, and no efficient treatment has yet been established. It is well known that the severity of pain as well as accompanying symptoms can often be influenced either by psychological or by social factors, which support the recognition of the disease as one of functional somatic disorders.

Methods: American College of Rheumatology (ACR) revised the classification criteria for diagnosis of FM in 2010, after 20 years of clinical use of the old one that had been published in 1990. Old criteria simply classifies patients as FM by number of tender points (11 or more, out of 18 in total), whereas new one considers not only the extent of widespread pain but also the severity of pain and many accompanying symptoms. In this study, comparison between the new and old criterion was performed in total 61 patients with FM or doubtful FM (male 11, female 50, average age 54.0 years, average duration from onset 4.5 years).

Results: Tender points by 1990 criteria was 12.0 in average (min 0, max 18), with 42 patients out of 56 presenting 11 or more, who were diagnosed as FM. Average Widespread Pain Index (WPI) and Symptom Severity (SS) by 2010 criteria scored 10.9 (min 2, max 18) and 6.1 (min 1, max 12), respectively, resulting 38 out of 59 were diagnosed as FM (WPI>7, SS>5 or 3<WPI<6, SS>9). Sum of the two scores in new criteria, WPI and SS, was 16.8 in average (min 3, max 29), and demonstrated positive correlation with tender points in old criteria (r=0.45). However, diagnoses by the two criterion did not always coincide.

Conclusion: Despite of overall accordance between two criterions, the diagnosis did not always coincide. Interestingly, the positivity of tender points in old criteria as well as that of widespread pain in new one demonstrated significant differences by the locus. Moreover, the positivity of accompanying symptoms in new criteria (41 in total) demonstrated significant differences from each other. All these differences may suggest that pain and tender locus as well as accompanying symptoms could be weighed either more or less, not equally as they are, depending the influence in diagnosis. Physicians should apply these criterion flexibly.


Disclosure: K. Shi, None; K. Miki, None; M. Yukioka, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Shi K, Miki K, Yukioka M. Comparison of New and Old American College of Rheumatology Classification Criterion for Diagnosis of Fibromyalgia [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-new-and-old-american-college-of-rheumatology-classification-criterion-for-diagnosis-of-fibromyalgia/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-new-and-old-american-college-of-rheumatology-classification-criterion-for-diagnosis-of-fibromyalgia/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology