ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2647

Comparison of Low-Dose Intravenous Cyclophosphamide with Oral Mycophenolate Mofetil in the Treatment of Lupus Nephritis: Long Term Follow-up Data

Manish Rathi1, Aman Sharma2, Joyita Sharma3 and Krishan L Gupta3, 1Department of Nephrology,, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India, 2Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Services, Department of Internal Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India, Chandigarh, India, 3Nephrology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarrh, India

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: cyclophosphamide, lupus nephritis and mycophenolate mofetil

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Clinical Poster III: Treatment

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: We present the long-term follow-up of patients with lupus nephritis who completed the randomized controlled trial on comparison of low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide (IV CYC) with oral mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as the induction therapy.

Methods: Prospective data on kidney function and survival in 83 out of 100 patients, who completed the initial trial, were collected over at least 36 months. Response, number of relapses, and time to first relapse were compared between the low dose IV CYC and oral MMF group on follow-up. Response, complete remission (CR) and partial remission (PR) and relapse (mild, moderate and severe) were defined according to Kidney Disease Initiative Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria.

Results: Of the initial 100 patients randomized to two groups, 83 patients (42 in IV CYC arm and 41 in oral MMF arm) completed 24 weeks study period. Of these, 67 patients had achieved treatment response, while 16 patients did not achieve response. All the 67 responders were started on azathioprine as the maintenance agent. On follow-up, 15 relapses occurred in the MMF group (13 patients had 1 relapse each and 2 had more than 1 relapse) and 12 relapses were seen in the IV CYC group (12 patients had 1 relapse each) on a follow-up of 36 months (p>0.05). Of the 15 relapses in the MMF group, 9 were mild, 5 were moderate and 1 was severe relapse, respectively. The patient with severe relapse died due to disease activity at 36th month of follow-up. Of the 12 relapses in the IV CYC group, 8 were mild and 4 were moderate relapses, respectively.

Of the 16 non-responders, 11 were started on azathioprine, 4 were started on alternate induction agent and one patient was continued on the same induction agent. Of the 11 patients on azathioprine, the mean time to achieve response was 9.38 months in all, except in 3 lost to follow-up and 3 had mild relapse on follow-up. Of the 4 patients on alternate induction therapy, 2 required further change in therapy, 1 responded at 18 months and 1 died at 12 months due to disease activity. The patient on the same induction agent achieved response at 30 months. Overall, the mean time to first relapse was 23.95 months in the IV CYC group and 23.22 months in the oral MMF group (p=0.807).

Conclusion: Long term follow-up data shows that both low dose IV CYC and oral MMF induction therapy followed by azathioprine maintenance are equally effective in maintaining response in patients with lupus nephritis.


Disclosure: M. Rathi, None; A. Sharma, None; J. Sharma, None; K. L. Gupta, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Rathi M, Sharma A, Sharma J, Gupta KL. Comparison of Low-Dose Intravenous Cyclophosphamide with Oral Mycophenolate Mofetil in the Treatment of Lupus Nephritis: Long Term Follow-up Data [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-low-dose-intravenous-cyclophosphamide-with-oral-mycophenolate-mofetil-in-the-treatment-of-lupus-nephritis-long-term-follow-up-data/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-low-dose-intravenous-cyclophosphamide-with-oral-mycophenolate-mofetil-in-the-treatment-of-lupus-nephritis-long-term-follow-up-data/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology