ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1974

Comparison of Gait Spatiotemporal Measures Between Patients with Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy or Midportion Achilles Tendinopathy

Hayley Smitheman1, Kayla Seymore1, Andy Smith1, Morgan Potter1, Nabeel Alghamdi1 and Karin Silbernagel2, 1University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 2University of Delaware, Avondale, PA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: foot, gait, Orthopedics, pain

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Title: (1973–1976) Orthopedics, Low Back Pain, & Rehabilitation Poster

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Insertional and midportion Achilles tendinopathy (AT) are painful injuries affecting both active and sedentary populations. Patients with AT present with pain with loading, often reporting pain with walking. Compared to midportion AT, insertional AT is more frequently associated with pain in positions of dorsiflexion, experienced during walking, due to compression of the distal tendon on the calcaneus. It is unknown however, if differences exist in gait spatiotemporal measures between AT subtypes and further, if these measures relate to pain. Therefore, the purpose of this analysis is to compare spatiotemporal measures of gait between patients with midportion AT and patients with insertional AT. We also aimed to assess the relationship between pain and spatiotemporal measures within each subtype.

Methods: Patients with insertional AT and midportion AT ambulated at their self-selected pace for 10m. Gait speed and percent of time spent in swing, stance, load response, flat foot, and pre-swing on the most symptomatic limb were measured with inertial measurement units (MuscleLab). Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain interference was used to assess pain. Independent t-tests were used to assess for differences in outcome variables between AT subtypes. Pearson correlations were used to assess for relationship between PROMIS pain interference and gait measures in patients with insertional AT and patients with midportion AT.

Results: 42 patients with insertional AT (24 F; 51.8±9 years; 32.4±7 kg/m2) and 178 patients with midportion AT (100 F; 47.1±13 years; 28.7±6 kg/m2) were included. No significant differences were observed between AT subtypes in any gait spatiotemporal measures or PROMIS pain interference (p >0.05). In patients with midportion AT, there was a significant negative relationship between PROMIS pain interference and gait speed (r=-0.153, p=0.048) but no significant relationship with all other gait measures (p’s >0.05). In patients with insertional AT, there was a significant negative relationship between PROMIS pain interference and gait speed (r=-0.387, p=0.012) and a significant negative relationship between PROMIS pain interference and percent time in load response phase (r=-0.489, p< 0.001). There were no other significant relationships with remaining analysis in patients with insertional AT.

Conclusion: No differences were observed between gait parameters or pain interference between AT subtypes. In patients with midportion AT, increased pain interference was weakly correlated with slower gait speed. The same pattern was observed in patients with insertional AT, however, the relationship was moderate between increased pain interference and reduced gait speed. Further, in patients with insertional AT, increased pain interference was moderately related to percent of time in the load response phase. Therefore, gait in patients with insertional AT may be more associated with pain than in midportion AT.


Disclosures: H. Smitheman: None; K. Seymore: None; A. Smith: None; M. Potter: None; N. Alghamdi: None; K. Silbernagel: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Smitheman H, Seymore K, Smith A, Potter M, Alghamdi N, Silbernagel K. Comparison of Gait Spatiotemporal Measures Between Patients with Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy or Midportion Achilles Tendinopathy [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-gait-spatiotemporal-measures-between-patients-with-insertional-achilles-tendinopathy-or-midportion-achilles-tendinopathy/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-gait-spatiotemporal-measures-between-patients-with-insertional-achilles-tendinopathy-or-midportion-achilles-tendinopathy/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology