ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0782

Comparison of Dual-immunosuppressive Therapy with a Voclosporin-based, Triple-immunosuppressive Regimen for Lupus Nephritis in the ALMS and AURORA 1 Studies

Maria Dall'Era1, Ernie Yap2, Matt Truman2, Lucy Hodge2 and Neil Solomons3, 1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 2Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc., Edmonton, AB, Canada, 3Neil Solomons Consulting Inc., Victoria, BC, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: clinical trial, glucocorticoids, Lupus nephritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 12, 2023

Title: Abstracts: SLE – Treatment I: Renal

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:00PM-3:30PM

Background/Purpose: Dual-immunosuppressive regimens consisting of high-dose glucocorticoids and higher doses ( >2 g/day) of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are still frequently used for the initial management of active lupus nephritis (LN) despite the known serious and dose-dependent safety risks associated with both of these agents.

To understand the safety and efficacy of a voclosporin-based, MMF and glucocorticoid-sparing, triple immunosuppressive regimen as an initial approach to treatment in active LN compared to more conventional regimens, we compared and analyzed safety and efficacy data in propensity-matched patients from the ALMS and AURORA 1. We hypothesized that a voclosporin-based, triple immunotherapy approach would reduce patient exposure to the toxicities associated with glucocorticoids and MMF, resulting in an improved safety profile without compromising efficacy.

Methods: Both studies enrolled patients with active LN. In ALMS, MMF was dosed to a target of 3 g/day with oral glucocorticoids initiated at a maximum dose of 60 mg/day and tapered every 2 weeks to 10 mg/day. In AURORA 1, patients received voclosporin 23.7 mg BID in combination with MMF (target dose 2 g/day) and oral glucocorticoids (starting dose of 25 mg/day tapered to 2.5 mg/day by Week 16). Propensity score matching was used to generate two groups of matched patients based on a set of demographic and disease characteristics. Safety and efficacy outcomes were assessed at 3 and 6 months.

Results: Propensity matching identified 96 pairs of patients with similar demographics and baseline disease characteristics (Table 1). At 3 and 6 months, MMF and glucocorticoid exposure was more than two-fold higher in ALMS than AURORA 1. Overall, fewer adverse events were observed in AURORA 1 across the majority of organ systems, including gastrointestinal, skin and subcutaneous tissues, endocrine, and psychiatric disorders, although more patients in AURORA 1 were reported to experience GFR decrease (Table 2). The incidence of serious adverse events was similar in both groups at 3 and 6 months. In the first 3 months, significantly more patients in AURORA 1 achieved >25% UPCR reduction from baseline (p=0.011; Table 3); the proportions of patients achieving UPCR ≤0.5 g/g and >50% UPCR reduction from baseline were numerically greater in the voclosporin arm; the differences were not statistically significant.

Conclusion: Patients treated with voclosporin in combination with low-dose glucocorticoids and lower-dose MMF demonstrated an improved safety profile and earlier reductions in proteinuria compared to patients treated with high-dose glucocorticoids and higher doses of MMF. These findings affirm the KDIGO 2023 recommendation that a voclosporin-based, triple-immunotherapy regimen should be considered as an initial therapy in patients with active LN.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: M. Dall'Era: Annexon Biosciences, 2, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, Aurinia, 2, Biogen, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2; E. Yap: Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, 3, 11; M. Truman: Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, 2; L. Hodge: Aurinia, 3, 11; N. Solomons: Aurinia, 2, 3, 11.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Dall'Era M, Yap E, Truman M, Hodge L, Solomons N. Comparison of Dual-immunosuppressive Therapy with a Voclosporin-based, Triple-immunosuppressive Regimen for Lupus Nephritis in the ALMS and AURORA 1 Studies [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-dual-immunosuppressive-therapy-with-a-voclosporin-based-triple-immunosuppressive-regimen-for-lupus-nephritis-in-the-alms-and-aurora-1-studies/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-dual-immunosuppressive-therapy-with-a-voclosporin-based-triple-immunosuppressive-regimen-for-lupus-nephritis-in-the-alms-and-aurora-1-studies/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology