ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1966

Comparison of a Dynamic Optical System with Physician Physical Assessment of PIP Joints of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients

Wei Tang1, Leila Khalili2, Moegammad Bardien3, Alessandro Marone3, Chloe Gong2, Xin Wang2, Shane Murray2, Stephen Kim3, Andreas Hielscher3, Laura Geraldino4 and Anca Askanase2, 1Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, 2Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, 3Tandon School of Engineering New York University, New York, NY, 4Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Imaging, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 18, 2024

Title: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Patients with SLE arthritis face chronic, disabling symptoms, and progressive joint damage. Arthritis/arthralgias is one of the most common symptoms of lupus. The heterogeneity of lupus arthritis and the shortcomings of arthritis measurements contribute to diagnostic/treatment delays and clinical trial failures. In a preliminary study, with 20 lupus patients and 10 healthy volunteers, we showed that optical tomographic imaging (OTI) can differentiate inflamed SLE joints from normal joints. We are able to determine the spatial distribution of physiologically relevant tissue parameters by shining a near-infrared light onto joints and measuring transmitted and reflected light intensities.

Methods: We designed and evaluated a glove-like optical imaging system (GLOIS) to measure lupus arthritis, figure 1. The optical instrumentation utilized flexible bands with eight optical modules wrapped around the joints. Each module contained a photodiode and three light-emitting diodes (LEDs) (wavelengths λ=530 nm, 660 nm, and 880 nm). The LEDs were lit sequentially, and the photodiodes captured the corresponding readings. Twelve SLE patients were evaluated. Each patient had up to 8 proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints (bilateral PIP 2-5) imaged using the optical imaging system, resulting in 67 joint images. Physician evaluations determined tender and swollen joints; painful joints are based on patient-report. The hemodynamic effect was obtained using a BP cuff; after a 30s baseline measurement, the BP cuff was inflated to the subject’s diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and kept inflated for 1 minute while optical image measurements were obtained. A second measurement was recorded at the subject’s mean arterial pressure (MAP). We acquired the rise-time (RT) and plateau-time (PT) from the recorded hemodynamic response for each wavelength at each pressure point. Figure 2 represents optical changes associated with hemodynamic response and illustrates the RT and PT.

Results: Out of the 67 joints evaluated 52 were swollen, 19 tender, and 15 painful. Optical measurements of hemodynamic responses and swollen joints were best correlated at 660nm, DBP, and PT (ρ =0.47, p< 0.001); the mean PT for unaffected and affected joints were 15.3+/-2.9s and 23.9+/-9.3s. Optical measurements of hemodynamic responses and painful joints were best correlated at 880nm, MAP, and PT (ρ =0.61, p< 0.001); the mean PT for unaffected and affected joints were 19.1+/-8.7s and 30.8+/-10.8. Figure 2 shows a box plot showing the differences between PT in affected and unaffected joints for the correlations presented. Tenderness did not correlate with optical tracings.

Conclusion: These data show that swollen and painful fingers have different hemodynamic responses compared to unaffected fingers. Tenderness did not correlate with optical changes. OT has the potential to provide the much-needed objective data in the assessment of lupus arthritis to improve arthritis evaluations in clinical care and clinical trials. Further development of this technology is currently underway and necessary.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1. The glove-like optical imaging system

Supporting image 2

Figure 2. A representative hemodynamic response to cuff inflation showing RT and PT at 660nm and DBP (left) and a comparison of a swollen and unaffected joint acquired from the same patient at 660nm and DBP (right)

Supporting image 3

Figure 3. Box plots showing PT for affected and unaffected joints for swollen joint at λ= 660nm and DBP (A) and painful joints at λ= 880nm and DBP(B).


Disclosures: W. Tang: None; L. Khalili: None; M. Bardien: None; A. Marone: None; C. Gong: None; X. Wang: None; S. Murray: None; S. Kim: None; A. Hielscher: None; L. Geraldino: Aurinia, 1, 2, Bristol Myers Squibb, 1, 2; A. Askanase: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, Amgen, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, Aurinia, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, Cabaletta, 2, Celgene, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Genentech, 2, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), 2, Idorsia, 2, Janssen, 2, Mallinckrodt, 2, NKARTA, 2, Pfizer, 2, Sana, 2, Sanofi, 2, UCB, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Tang W, Khalili L, Bardien M, Marone A, Gong C, Wang X, Murray S, Kim S, Hielscher A, Geraldino L, Askanase A. Comparison of a Dynamic Optical System with Physician Physical Assessment of PIP Joints of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-a-dynamic-optical-system-with-physician-physical-assessment-of-pip-joints-of-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-a-dynamic-optical-system-with-physician-physical-assessment-of-pip-joints-of-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology