ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1300

Comparison Between Semiquantitative and Quantitative Methods for the Assessment of Knee Synovitis Using Non-Enhanced and Gadolinium-Enhanced MRI

Michel D. Crema1, Frank Roemer2, Ling Li3, Laura B. Rosen4, Amanda Dudley5, Robert Alexander6 and Ali Guermazi7, 1Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 2Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 3Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 4AstraZeneca Neuroscience Innovative Medicines, Cambridge, MA, 5AstraZeneca Neuroscience Innovative Medicines, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 6Pfizer Neuroscience, Cambridge, MA, 7Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Knee, Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), osteoarthritis and synovitis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases Poster II: X-ray, MRI, PET and CT

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:   There is evidence that the presence of synovitis in knee
osteoarthritis (OA) is clinically relevant since it is associated with pain and
structural damage. As several methods are available on MRI to assess and
quantify synovitis in knee OA, our aim was to compare different
semiquantitative and quantitative methods using both non-enhanced and gadolinium-enhanced
MRI.

Methods: End-stage clinical OA knees in patients undergoing a total knee
replacement surgery were included in this cross-sectional study. MRI was
performed and included non-enhanced (triplanar fat
suppressed (FS) intermediate-weighted sequences with fat suppression) as well
as gadolinium-enhanced sequences (sagittal and axial T1-weighted FS sequences).
Using non-enhanced MRI, we semiquantitatively assessed two features widely used
as surrogate for synovitis: “effusion-synovitis” (ES), representing a
combination of joint effusion and synovial thickening; and “Hoffa-synovitis”
(HS), representing ill-defined high-signal intensity of Hoffa’s fat pad at the
intercondylar region, both graded from 0 to 3. Using gadolinium-enhanced
sequences, we semiquantitatively assessed synovial thickness (ST) in 11 regions
of the knee, graded from 0 to 2. Then, we summed the scores for the 11 regions
and graded whole-knee synovitis as: grade 0 (total score<5), grade 1 (5-8),
grade 2 (9-12), and grade 3 (>12). Using manual segmentation we
quantitatively evaluated the total synovial volume (SV) on gadolinium-enhanced
sequences, in mm³, and defined 3 grades of SV as: grade 1 (<30mm³), grade 2
(30-60 mm²), and grade 3 (>60 mm³). As synovitis is ideally evaluated using
gadolinium-enhanced sequences, we assessed the correlations of synovitis grades
of ES and HS with synovitis grades of ST and SV, applying Spearman correlation
analysis. Furthermore, we compared the sum of scores of ST with SV as
continuous variables using Pearson correlation analysis.

Results:   A total of 104 subjects (1 knee per subject) were included;
mean age 67 ± 7; 64 females (61.4%); mean body mass index 30 ± 5. The number of
knees exhibiting the different grades of ES, HS, ST, and SV is presented in
Table 1. Using gadolinium-enhanced sequences, the mean summed score for “ST”
synovitis was 15.0 ± 3.8; the mean “SV” synovitis was 56.0 ± 17.1 mm³. A
positive and significant correlation was found between ES and ST (r=0.41;
p<.0001), as well as between HS and ST (r=0.32; p<.001). A positive and
significant correlation between the summed scores of ST and total SV was found
using gadolinium-enhanced sequences (r=0.53; p<.0001). 

Conclusion:   ES showed a better correlation with ST assessed on
gadolinium-enhanced sequences, and should be preferred over HS as a surrogate
marker for synovitis in knee OA studies in which gadolinium-enhanced sequences
are not available. Using gadolinium-enhanced sequences, both ST and SV methods
may be applied to assess knee synovitis.


Disclosure: M. D. Crema, Boston Imaging Core Lab, 1; F. Roemer, Boston Imaging Core Lab, 4; L. Li, None; L. B. Rosen, AstraZeneca Neuroscience Innovative Medicines, 3; A. Dudley, AstraZeneca Neuroscience Innovative Medicines, 3; R. Alexander, Pfizer Neuroscience, 3; A. Guermazi, Boston Imaging Core Lab, LLC, 1,TissueGene, 5,OrthoTrophix, 5,MerckSerono, 5,Genzyme Corporation, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Crema MD, Roemer F, Li L, Rosen LB, Dudley A, Alexander R, Guermazi A. Comparison Between Semiquantitative and Quantitative Methods for the Assessment of Knee Synovitis Using Non-Enhanced and Gadolinium-Enhanced MRI [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-between-semiquantitative-and-quantitative-methods-for-the-assessment-of-knee-synovitis-using-non-enhanced-and-gadolinium-enhanced-mri/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-between-semiquantitative-and-quantitative-methods-for-the-assessment-of-knee-synovitis-using-non-enhanced-and-gadolinium-enhanced-mri/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology