ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1089

Comparing the immunosuppressant burden in immune checkpoint inhibitor mediated inflammatory arthritis versus polymyalgia rheumatica: results from a prospective multicenter registry

Alice Tison1, Deanna Jannat-Khah2, Laura Cappelli3 and Anne R. Bass2, 1LBAI, UMR1227, University of Brest, CHU Brest, Brest, France, Brest, France, 2Hospital For Special Surgery, New York, NY, 3Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), Drug toxicity, Miscellaneous Rheumatic and Inflammatory Diseases, registry

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: (1088–1122) Immunological Complications of Medical Therapy Poster

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Inflammatory arthritis (IA)- and polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR)-like syndromes occur in about 6% of patients receiving an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and can worsen quality of life. Finding the balance between immunosuppression use without affecting the tumor response is critical. Currently, ICI-IA/PMR management is not standardized and is based on expert opinion. It is unknown whether ICI-IA and ICI-PMR can be treated with the same immunosuppressive regimens. We aimed to compare the utilization of steroids and other DMARDs between these two entities.

Methods: Data were extracted from the Rheumatology Adverse Events Due to Immunotherapy Observational Study (RADIOS) registry regarding patients with ICI-IA or ICI-PMR and no preexisting IA who had been prospectively recruited into RADIOS since 2015 at nine sites around the United States. Data was downloaded on 11/6/2024. Steroids were defined as methylprednisolone and prednisone. We excluded hydrocortisone, used for adrenal replacement, and dexamethasone, used for cancer-related symptoms. Cumulative steroid utilization from the time of onset of IA was available for a subset of patients. We analyzed only immunosuppressive DMARDs, such as methotrexate, leflunomide and biologic/targeted synthetic DMARDs, because of potential impact to tumor responses from ICIs. Categorical and continuous data were compared using descriptive statistics. Kaplan Meier curves were used for survival analyses and groups were compared using a log rank test. We measured the time to a prednisone equivalent dosage i. 10 mg/day or ii. 5 mg/day starting from the first steroid dose received at or after the date of the patient’s baseline visit in RADIOS. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare DMARD utilization in ICI-IA versus ICI-PMR, adjusted for maximum grade (severity), cancer type, the use of combination ICI (anti-CTLA4 plus anti-PD1), recruitment institution and age.

Results: 443 patients were included, n=379 with ICI-IA and n=64 with ICI PMR. 49% were female, with a median age of 66 years (IQR 55,73). Anti PD-1/PDL-1 was used in 265 patients (72%) and combination ICI in 92 (25%). At baseline, 11 ICI-PMR patients (20%) had a peripheral synovitis primarily involving the hand, knee and wrist (Table 1). The median maximum steroid dose prescribed after baseline did not differ between groups (p=0.92) (Table 2). Time to reach a steroid dose of 10 or 5 mg/day from first steroid prescription after baseline was also comparable (p=0.74 and p=0.50 respectively) (Figure 1 A, B). There was no difference in average daily steroid dose between the two groups in the first 6 months after symptoms onset (Table 2, Figure 1 C, D). DMARDs were more prescribed to patients with ICI-IA (43%) than ICI-PMR (23%) (p=0.004). This difference remained after adjusting for confounders in a multivariable logistic regression model (OR= 3.03 [95%CI 1.10, 8.34], p=0.032).

Conclusion: Patients with ICI-IA were more likely to be treated with immunosuppressive DMARDs than patients with ICI-PMR. Treatment with steroids was comparable between the two groups. Identifying more severe phenotypes at diagnosis might help to avoid longer steroid exposure before DMARD initiation.

Supporting image 1ICI-IA: immune checkpoint inhibitor mediated inflammatory arthritis, ICI-PMR: immune checkpoint inhibitor mediated polymyalgia rheumatica, RF : Rheumatoid factor

Supporting image 2BL: Baseline RADIOS registry visit, b/ts DMARD: biologic/targeted synthetic Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drug, csDMARD: conventional synthetic Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drug, ICI-IA: immune checkpoint inhibitor mediated inflammatory arthritis, ICI-PMR: immune checkpoint inhibitor mediated polymyalgia rheumatica, irAE : immune related adverse event. # azathioprine in 2, cytoxan in 2, IVIg in 5, leflunomide in 21 (all in the ICI-IA group), mycophenolate mofetil in 4, sulfasalazine in 13, other in 7 , ## abatacept in 3 (all in the ICI-IA group), rituximab in 3 (all in the ICI-IA group), JAK inhibitor in 5 (all in the ICI-IA group), other in 10.

Supporting image 3* Baseline = Baseline RADIOS registry visit


Disclosures: A. Tison: Celltrion Healthcare France, 12, Support for attending a congress, Galapagos, 2; D. Jannat-Khah: AstraZeneca, 11, CytoDyn, 11; L. Cappelli: Amgen, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 5, Sanofi, 2, Uniquity Bio, 2; A. Bass: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Tison A, Jannat-Khah D, Cappelli L, Bass A. Comparing the immunosuppressant burden in immune checkpoint inhibitor mediated inflammatory arthritis versus polymyalgia rheumatica: results from a prospective multicenter registry [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparing-the-immunosuppressant-burden-in-immune-checkpoint-inhibitor-mediated-inflammatory-arthritis-versus-polymyalgia-rheumatica-results-from-a-prospective-multicenter-registry/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparing-the-immunosuppressant-burden-in-immune-checkpoint-inhibitor-mediated-inflammatory-arthritis-versus-polymyalgia-rheumatica-results-from-a-prospective-multicenter-registry/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology