ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0767

Comparing Large Vessel Uptake of 68Ga-HA-DOTATATE to 18F-FDG Using PET/CT Imaging in Patients with Active Giant Cell Arteritis

Alison Clifford1, Jonathan Abele1, Ryan Hung1, Paolo Raggi1, Frank Wuest1, Jan Andersson1, Elaine Yacyshyn2, Eric Lenza1, Glen Jickling1 and Jan Willem Cohen Tervaert1, 1University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada, 2University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: giant cell arteritis, Imaging, Nuclear Medicine, Vasculitis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 16, 2024

Title: Vasculitis – Non-ANCA-Associated & Related Disorders Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose (FDG) is the current standard among radiotracers for PET/CT imaging of large vessel vasculitis (LVV) in giant cell arteritis (GCA), but its performance is influenced by glucocorticoids. We aimed to compare 68Ga-HA-DOTATATE (DOTA), a somatostatin analogue, to FDG for LVV detection using PET/CT in patients with active GCA.

Methods: In this pilot study, 8 active GCA patients (with disease confirmation by either temporal artery biopsy or positive large vessel imaging) who had initiated glucocorticoids within 2 weeks of enrolment were prospectively consented and scanned with both FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-HA-DOTATATE PET/CT.  Images were reviewed by 2 experienced Nuclear Medicine physicians. Tracer uptake was assessed by visual scoring (compared to liver) and semi-quantitatively in 8 vascular territories (thoracic and abdominal aorta, bilateral subclavian, vertebral, carotid, femoral/iliac, temporal and coronary arteries) using SUVmax. Target-background ratios (TBR) were calculated using both right atrium (RA) mean (TBRRA) and liver mean (TBRliver) as comparators. Index vessel was defined as the vessel with the greatest tracer uptake in each participant. DOTA and FDG TBR’s in individual vascular territories and index vessels were compared using Wilcoxon signed rank test. P< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Of 8 enrolled patients, the median age was 71.5 years (range 64-82), and 4 (50%) were women.  See Table 1 for baseline characteristics.  Five of 8 (62.5%) FDG scans had >= grade 2 visual uptake in the large vessels, consistent with active LVV.  Tracer uptake could be detected semi-quantitatively in the medium-large arteries in both FDG and DOTA scans. DOTA identified a different index vessel from FDG in 4/8 (50%) patients.

The FDG median SUVmax values were significantly higher than DOTA median SUVmax values in every individual vascular territory (p< =0.025 for all comparisons), as was the FDG median RA SUVmean [1.85 in FDG vs 0.35 in DOTA, z=2.52, p=0.012]. Due to very low blood pool activity, calculated DOTA median TBRRA values were significantly higher in every individual vascular territory as compared to FDG (p< = 0.025 for all comparisons), and the DOTA median Index Vessel TBRRA was significantly higher than the FDG median Index Vessel [5.08 vs 1.805, z=-2.38, p=0.017.)

In contrast, the FDG median Liver SUVmean was significantly lower as compared to DOTA [2.38 vs 7.88, z=2.52, p=0.012]. Correspondingly, DOTA median TBRliver values were significantly lower in every vascular territory as compared to FDG (p=0.012 all comparisons), as was DOTA median Index Vessel TBRliver as compared to FDG [0.242 vs 1.39, z=-2.52 p=0.012.)

Conclusion: 68Ga-HA-DOTATATE uptake can be detected in the aorta and medium branch vessels, including temporal and coronary arteries, of patients with active GCA who have started glucocorticoids.  The distribution of DOTA uptake differs from that of FDG, with significantly lower blood pool and higher liver uptake, corresponding to higher vascular TBRRA values and lower TBRliver values. Additional work is needed to determine the best method of quantifying vascular DOTA uptake in GCA.

Supporting image 1

Values represent median +/- range or number and percent, unless otherwise indicated. Abbreviations: HTN (hypertension), IHD (ischemic heart disease), ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate), CRP (c-reactive protein), TAB (temporal artery biopsy positive), ASA (aspirin), FDG (18F-fluorodeoxyglucose).


Disclosures: A. Clifford: Abbvie, 5, UCB, 6; J. Abele: Canadian Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (CNETS), 5; R. Hung: None; P. Raggi: None; F. Wuest: None; J. Andersson: None; E. Yacyshyn: Otsuka Canada, 6, Sobi, 6; E. Lenza: None; G. Jickling: None; J. Cohen Tervaert: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Clifford A, Abele J, Hung R, Raggi P, Wuest F, Andersson J, Yacyshyn E, Lenza E, Jickling G, Cohen Tervaert J. Comparing Large Vessel Uptake of 68Ga-HA-DOTATATE to 18F-FDG Using PET/CT Imaging in Patients with Active Giant Cell Arteritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparing-large-vessel-uptake-of-68ga-ha-dotatate-to-18f-fdg-using-pet-ct-imaging-in-patients-with-active-giant-cell-arteritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparing-large-vessel-uptake-of-68ga-ha-dotatate-to-18f-fdg-using-pet-ct-imaging-in-patients-with-active-giant-cell-arteritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology