ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1359

Comparative Safety Outcomes of Tofacitinib Versus Upadacitinib in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Maya Khasho1, Ahmad Alomari2, Reem Elmusa3 and Rafal Ali4, 1University of central florida, Gainesville, FL, 2UCF- North Florida hospital, Gainesville, FL, 3UCF/ HCA - North florida hospital, Gainesville, FL, 4Jefferson Einstein Philadelphia, Lansdale, PA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: (1347–1375) Rheumatoid Arthritis – Treatment Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease affecting synovial joints, often leading to joint destruction if untreated. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors like tofacitinib and upadacitinib, are essential for managing RA to achieve remission or low disease activity. However, JAK inhibitors are associated with adverse effects such as venous thromboembolism, malignancy, cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events, infections, and hyperlipidemia. Here is a comparative safety data between tofacitinib and upadacitinib.

Methods: We included RA patients aged ≥18 years, identified by ICD-10 codes, who initiated tofacitinib (n=20,305) or upadacitinib (n=6,281). The index event was the first RA diagnosis with corresponding medication. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed based on demographics, comorbidities (e.g., diabetes, hyperlipidemia, hypertension), and concurrent medications (e.g., methotrexate, TNF inhibitors). Post-matching, 6,276 patients per cohort were analyzed. Outcomes within five years post-treatment initiation included acute myocardial infarction, cerebral infarction, venous thrombosis/embolism, diverticular disease, pneumonia, herpes zoster, depression, hyperlipidemia, suicidal ideation, lymphoma/leukemia, basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), transaminitis, and neutropenia. Patients with prior occurrences were excluded. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

Results: After matching, each cohort included 6,276 RA patients. Tofacitinib was associated with higher risks of cerebral infarction (RR=1.694, 95% CI 1.29–2.24, P< 0.0001), acute myocardial infarction (RR=2.43, 95% CI 1.858–3.17, P< 0.0001), venous thrombosis/embolism (RR=1.465, 95% CI 1.182–1.818, P=0.0005), diverticular disease (RR=1.373, 95% CI 1.176–1.604, P< 0.0001), pneumonia (RR=1.73, 95% CI 1.472–2.034, P< 0.0001), herpes zoster (RR=1.413, 95% CI 1.157–1.725, P=0.0006), hyperlipidemia (RR=1.24, 95% CI 1.126–1.366, P< 0.0001), and depression (RR=1.453, 95% CI 1.287–1.640, P< 0.0001) compared to upadacitinib. No significant differences were found for suicidal ideation, lymphoid/hematopoietic malignancies, BCC, SCC, transaminitis, or neutropenia as shown in the table below

Conclusion: RA patients treated with tofacitinib have increased risks of cardiovascular events, venous thrombosis/embolism, diverticular disease, pneumonia, herpes zoster, hyperlipidemia, and depression compared to those on upadacitinib. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and investigate underlying mechanisms. Continuous monitoring of patient safety profiles is essential in RA management

Supporting image 1Table 1. Baseline Patient Characteristics of Study groups, Before and After Propensity Score Matching

Supporting image 2Table 2. Safety Outcomes in RA Patients: Tofacitinib vs. Upadacitinib.

Supporting image 3Table 2. Safety Outcomes in RA Patients: Tofacitinib vS. Upadacitinib (continued)


Disclosures: M. Khasho: None; A. Alomari: None; R. Elmusa: None; R. Ali: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Khasho M, Alomari A, Elmusa R, Ali R. Comparative Safety Outcomes of Tofacitinib Versus Upadacitinib in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Retrospective Cohort Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-safety-outcomes-of-tofacitinib-versus-upadacitinib-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-retrospective-cohort-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-safety-outcomes-of-tofacitinib-versus-upadacitinib-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-a-retrospective-cohort-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology