ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1375

Comparative Safety of Flavocoxid (Limbrel) Versus Nsaids Among Osteoarthritis Patients

Justin K Owensby1, Fenglong Xie1, Lang Chen1 and Jeffrey R. Curtis2, 1University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 2University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Osteoarthritis, risk assessment and safety

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Title: Osteoarthritis – Clinical Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Flavocoxid is a medical food formulated to assist in the management of patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Safety concerns based on case reports have been raised related to an association with acute liver injury and hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP). However, the absolute and comparative risk of these events relative to NSAIDs is unclear. Our objectives were to determine the incidence rate (IR) of severe acute liver injury, HP and other outcomes in a cohort of OA patients who were new users of flavocoxid versus prescription NSAIDs

Methods: MarketScan claims data (2006-2016) was used to identify patients age >=50 initiating flavocoxid or prescription NSAIDs with a history of OA or back pain and >= 6 months coverage before initiation. Patients were excluded if they had prior events or malignancy. New users defined by 6-month baseline period of non-use prior to initiation. Exposure was defined by days of supply + a 30 day extension, with a sensitivity analysis conducted with a 90 day extension.

Primary outcomes included hospitalization for HP and drug-induced liver injury, based on ICD-9 codes. Secondary outcomes included hospitalized GI bleed and acute myocardial infarction (MI). Poisson regression was used to calculate crude incidence rates per 1000 person-years (PY) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Propensity scores (PS) were used to match (1:2) flavocoxid to NSAID users based on demographics and >200 comorbidities (based on AHRQ’s CCS groupings). Cox regression was used for calculating adjusted hazard ratios (aHR).

Results: A total of 4800 flavocoxid and 2,129,727 NSAID new users met eligibility criteria. Prior to PS matching, many imbalances between flavocoxid and NSAID users were observed, all of which were greatly attenuated after PS matching. Post-match mean age for flavocoxid was 57, NSAIDs was 57. Flavocoxid users had higher prevalence of comorbidities and more healthcare utilization. The IR for HP associated with flavocoxid was 1.0 (95%CI 0.3-3.2) and for hospitalized liver injury was 4.1/1000, which after adjustment, was significantly elevated (aHR for HP: 5.6, 95%CI 0.5–68.6; aHR for hospitalized liver injury: 3.9, 95%CI 1.4-10.8 referent to NSAID use). Rates and aHR for GI bleed were lower (aHR=0.5, 95%CI 0.3-0.9) and there were no significant differences for MI.

Conclusion: The absolute risk for HP and severe liver injury associated with flavocoxid is low (1-4/1000py) but higher than in NSAID users, with a rate difference ~2/1000py). The risk-benefit profile of flavocoxid needs to be considered in light of its efficacy and overall safety profile including lower rates of hospitalized GI bleeding

Table: Incidence Rates, Adjusted Hazard Ratios

Outcome

Exposure

Event

Person Years

Incidence Rate per 1000 PY

PS-matched Adjusted HR

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis

FLAVOCOXID

3

2913.3

1.0 (0.3-3.2)

5.6 (0.5-68.6)

NSAID

1

5506.3

0.2 (0.0-1.3)

Reference

Hospitalized drug induced liver injury

FLAVOCOXID

9

2911.9

3.1 (1.6-5.9)

3.6 (1.2-11.2)

NSAID

5

5505.8

0.9 (0.4-2.2)

Reference

Hospitalized liver injury

FLAVOCOXID

12

2910.4

4.1 (2.3-7.3)

3.9 (1.4-10.8)

NSAID

6

5505.8

1.1 (0.5-2.4)

Reference

Hospitalized GI bleeding (sensitive)

FLAVOCOXID

14

2910.0

4.8 (2.8-8.1)

0.5 (0.3-0.9)

NSAID

55

5493.3

10.0 (7.7-13.0)

Reference

Hospitalized GI bleeding (specific)

FLAVOCOXID

5

2911.6

1.7 (0.7-4.1)

0.6 (0.2-1.6)

NSAID

18

5501.7

3.3 (2.1-5.2)

Reference

Myocardial infarction

FLAVOCOXID

20

2905.7

6.9 (4.4-10.7)

1.7 (0.9-3.1)

NSAID

22

5500.7

4.0 (2.6-6.1)

Reference


Disclosure: J. K. Owensby, None; F. Xie, None; L. Chen, None; J. R. Curtis, AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Corrona, Janssen, Lilly, Myriad, Pfizer, Radius, Roche/Genentech, UCB, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Owensby JK, Xie F, Chen L, Curtis JR. Comparative Safety of Flavocoxid (Limbrel) Versus Nsaids Among Osteoarthritis Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-safety-of-flavocoxid-limbrel-versus-nsaids-among-osteoarthritis-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-safety-of-flavocoxid-limbrel-versus-nsaids-among-osteoarthritis-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology