ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2370

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of IL-17 Inhibitors Versus Adalimumab in Biologic-Naive Psoriatic Arthritis Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Punith Chirumamilla1, Ravi Medarametla2, Anjani Mahesh Kumar Cherukuri3, Sri Laxmi Priya Sunkara4, Pranathi Bandarupalli5, Rithish Nimmagadda6, Greeshma Erasani7, Pavana Sakhamuri8 and Stephen Lindsey9, 1Baptist Memorial Hospital North Mississippi, Oxford, MS, 2Mamata Medical College, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India, 3Guntur Medical College, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India, 4White river medical center, batesville, AR, 5Mercy St Vincent Medical Center, Toledo, OH, 6One Brooklyn Health, New York, NY, 7University of Missouri-Kansas city school of medicine, KCMO, MO, 8LSUHSC, Lafayette, LA, 9LSU Health Sciences Center-New Orleans, Baton Rouge, LA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: American College of Rheumatology Criteria, Anti-TNF Drugs, autoimmune diseases, Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Title: (2338–2376) Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic immune-mediated disease which involves joints, skin, and nails, leading to deformities, decreased function, lower quality of life, and in many cases higher mortality. While traditional synthetic DMARDs and TNF inhibitors(TNFi), such as adalimumab, are effective existing treatments, they both have their shortcomings. Despite this, most patients with PsA do not achieve complete disease remission with synthetic DMARDs, and TNFi may be ineffective for skin, and lose efficacy over time, or be limited for long-term use due to safety concerns. IL-17 inhibitors target a separate inflammatory pathway and have demonstrated greater skin clearance and comparable joint improvement compared with TNFi in clinical trials at 52 weeks. This meta-analysis compares IL-17i versus adalimumab in biologic-naive PsA populations to evaluate safety and efficacy of using IL-17i in PsA patients.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane for English-language studies involving comparison of treatment effects between IL-17i and Adalimumab, and reported at least one relevant outcome. Three studies met inclusion criteria. Data were pooled using the inverse variance weighting method with a random-effects model in R Studio. Confidence intervals and heterogeneity were assessed, and forest plots were generated to visualise the pooled effect estimates.

Results: Three studies(Randomized controlled trials) involving 1990 patients were included. Analysis of IL-17i versus Adalimumab revealed comparable ACR50 responses (RR=1.06, 95% CI: 0.97–1.16, p=0.22) but significantly higher PASI75 achievement with IL-17i (RR=1.21, 95% CI: 1.11–1.31, p< 0.0001). The primary composite outcome (ACR50+PASI100) strongly favored IL-17i (RR=1.49, 95% CI: 1.26–1.78, p< 0.01). Serious adverse events were slightly less in IL-17i group but that change is not significant (RR=0.72, 95% CI: 0.35–1.50, p=0.38), and also IL-17i demonstrated significantly lower discontinuation rates due to adverse events (RR=0.56, 95% CI: 0.38–0.82, p< 0.01).

Conclusion: In biologically naive PsA patients, IL-17i showed comparable joint response, but has higher skin clearance compared to Adalimumab. IL-17i also has fewer discontinuations due to drug adverse events and overall it showed to be a great treatment option. Future Research should direct towards long-term outcomes and combination therapies to improve treatment algorithms.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2


Disclosures: P. Chirumamilla: None; R. Medarametla: None; A. Cherukuri: None; S. Sunkara: None; P. Bandarupalli: None; R. Nimmagadda: None; G. Erasani: None; P. Sakhamuri: None; S. Lindsey: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Chirumamilla P, Medarametla R, Cherukuri A, Sunkara S, Bandarupalli P, Nimmagadda R, Erasani G, Sakhamuri P, Lindsey S. Comparative Efficacy and Safety of IL-17 Inhibitors Versus Adalimumab in Biologic-Naive Psoriatic Arthritis Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-efficacy-and-safety-of-il-17-inhibitors-versus-adalimumab-in-biologic-naive-psoriatic-arthritis-patients-a-meta-analysis-of-randomized-controlled-trials/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-efficacy-and-safety-of-il-17-inhibitors-versus-adalimumab-in-biologic-naive-psoriatic-arthritis-patients-a-meta-analysis-of-randomized-controlled-trials/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology