ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1397

Comparative Effectiveness of Tocilizumab in Combination with Methotrexate versus Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors (TNFis) in Combination with Methotrexate in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis with Prior Exposure to TNFis

Dimitrios Pappas1, Taylor Blachley 2, Steve Zlotnick 3, Jennie Best 3, Kelechi Emeanuru 2 and Joel Kremer 4, 1Columbia University, New York, NY, 2Corrona, LLC, Waltham, MA, 3Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, 4Albany Medical College and The Center for Rheumatology; Corrona, LLC, Albany, NY

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: anti-TNF therapy, methotrexate (MTX) and registry, Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Tocilizumab

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: RA – Treatments Poster II: Established Treatments

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ) administered with methotrexate (MTX) in improving rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity in patients who have had an inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis). The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of TCZ + MTX with that of TNFis + MTX in patients with RA who had prior exposure to TNFis in routine clinical practice.

Methods: Eligible participants were TCZ-naïve patients from the Corrona RA registry who initiated TCZ + MTX or a TNFi + MTX after January 1, 2010 and had a 6-month follow-up visit. Patients in both groups must have used ≥ 1 TNFi, had a Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score available at initiation (baseline) and 6 months and had a CDAI score > 10 at baseline. The primary outcome was mean change in CDAI from baseline to 6 months. Secondary outcomes included achievement of low disease activity (LDA; CDAI ≤ 10) and mean change in modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ) at 6 months. Patients were grouped by baseline MTX dose (≤ 10 mg; > 10 to ≤ 15 mg; > 15 to ≤ 20 mg; > 20 mg); outcomes were compared between patients initiating TCZ and those initiating a TNFi overall and within each MTX dose group using propensity score (PS)-trimmed populations. As a sensitivity analysis, TCZ and TNFi initiators in each group were PS-matched 1:1 and outcomes were assessed in the matched populations. Linear and logistic regression models were estimated in the trimmed and matched populations, adjusting for covariates not balanced after PS trimming or matching, respectively.

Results: A total of 415 TCZ + MTX initiators and 725 TNFi + MTX initiators met the inclusion criteria prior to PS trimming or matching. The overall trimmed population included 402 TCZ + MTX initiators and 703 TNFi + MTX initiators. In the trimmed population, patient demographics were generally comparable between TCZ + MTX and TNFi + MTX initiators; the mean age was 57.1 years in the TCZ + MTX group and 57.7 years in the TNFi + MTX group, the majority of patients in both groups were female ( > 79%) and white ( > 82%) and the mean duration of RA was 11.8 and 10.5 years in the TCZ + MTX and TNFi + MTX groups, respectively. Higher proportions of patients initiating TCZ had received ≥ 2 prior biologics (66.0% to 76.3%) compared with those initiating a TNFi (33.2% to 42.2%) across all MTX dose groups. Patients initiating TCZ had higher mean baseline CDAI scores (26.5 to 29.3) than those initiating a TNFi (24.7 to 27.5). Patients in both cohorts had improvement in CDAI scores at 6 months regardless of baseline MTX dose. Improvement in CDAI and mHAQ and the odds of achieving LDA were comparable between TCZ and TNFi initiators across all MTX groups in the trimmed population after adjustment for potential confounding variables (Table). Similar results were observed in the PS-matched cohorts.

Conclusion: In this real-world population of US patients with RA who had prior TNFi exposure, there was no statistically significant or clinically meaningful difference in the effectiveness of therapy in patients who initiated TCZ + MTX compared with TNFi + MTX.

Acknowledgments: Support for third-party writing assistance, furnished by Health Interactions, Inc, was provided by Genentech, Inc.


Disclosure: D. Pappas, AbbVie, 5, Corrona, LLC, 1, 3, Novartis, 5, Roche, 5, Roche Hellas, 5; T. Blachley, Corrona, LLC, 3; S. Zlotnick, Genentech, 1, 3, Genentech, Inc., 1, 3; J. Best, Genentech, 1, 3, Genentech, Inc., 1, 3; K. Emeanuru, Corrona, LLC, 3; J. Kremer, AbbVie, 2, 5, Abbvie, 2, 5, AbbVie, Inc., 2, 5, Amgen, 5, BMS, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squib, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Corrona LLC, 1, 3, Corrona, LLC, 1, 3, Genentech, 5, Genentech, Inc., 5, GSK, 5, Lilly, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Regeneron, 5, Sanofi, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Pappas D, Blachley T, Zlotnick S, Best J, Emeanuru K, Kremer J. Comparative Effectiveness of Tocilizumab in Combination with Methotrexate versus Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors (TNFis) in Combination with Methotrexate in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis with Prior Exposure to TNFis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-effectiveness-of-tocilizumab-in-combination-with-methotrexate-versus-tumor-necrosis-factor-inhibitors-tnfis-in-combination-with-methotrexate-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-with-pr/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-effectiveness-of-tocilizumab-in-combination-with-methotrexate-versus-tumor-necrosis-factor-inhibitors-tnfis-in-combination-with-methotrexate-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-with-pr/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology