ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0809

Comparative Effectiveness of Intravenous Golimumab vs Dose-Escalated Infliximab in a Real World Population of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: 52-Week Data from the AWARE Study

Sergio Schwartzman1, Shelly Kafka2, Douglas Conaway3, Aaron Broadwell4, Shawn Black2, Stephen Xu5, Wayne Langholff6 and Jeffrey R Curtis7, 1Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, 2Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, 3Grand Strand Regional Medical Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, 4Rheumatology and Osteoporosis Specialists, Shreveport, LA, 5Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, 6Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, 7Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 7, 2020

Title: RA – Treatments Poster II: Comparative Effectiveness, Biosimilars, Adherence & the Real World

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: AWARE (Comparative and Pragmatic Study of Golimumab IV Versus Infliximab in Rheumatoid Arthritis) is a Phase 4, prospective, noninterventional, observational, multicenter (88 sites), 3-year US study providing real-world assessment of intravenous golimumab (GLM) and infliximab (IFX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Treatment decisions, including prescribed dose and dosing interval, are made by the treating rheumatologists. This analysis of 52-week results from AWARE explored patterns of dose escalation among IFX patients and compared changes in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), comparing IFX and GLM.

Methods: AWARE enrolled patients initiating GLM or IFX treatment. Prescribed dose was recorded at the time of infusion. IFX patients had dose-escalation when ≥1 normalized prescribed dose exceeded the baseline dose. Normalized prescribed dose = ([prescribed dose] x [scheduled time interval] / [actual time interval]). CDAI was determined at baseline and Months 3, 6, and 12. See table for statistical methods.

Results: Baseline demographics were generally similar between 685 GLM and 585 IFX patients (including 425 dose-escalated IFX patients), although mean ± SD disease duration was 9.20 ± 9.97 years for GLM and 6.87 ± 9.28 years for dose-escalated IFX patients. Among bionaïve and non-bionaïve GLM patients with an imputed CDAI measure, the mean prescribed dose was 2.0 mg/kg from infusion 1 through 9. The mean normalized prescribed dose among bionaïve dose-escalated IFX patients with CDAI data as 3.25 mg/kg and increased at each infusion through infusion 9 (5.14 mg/kg). The mean normalized prescribed dose among non-bionaïve dose-escalated IFX patients with CDAI data was 3.29 mg/kg and increased at each infusion through infusion 9 (5.48 mg/kg). Based on the definition of normalized dose, 75.9% of all IFX patients were dose-escalated (72.4% of bionaïve IFX and 78.7% of non-bionaïve IFX patients). The percent of bionaïve IFX patients prescribed at least 1 dose ≥8 mg/kg increased with each infusion through infusion 12. At the 10th and 12th infusions, respectively, 15.1% (39/258) and 19.1% (36/188) of IFX patients had received at least 1 IFX dose ≥8 mg/kg. Mean changes from baseline in CDAI for GLM, dose-escalated IFX, and non-dose-escalated IFX patients at Months 6 and 12 are shown in the Table.

Conclusion: The majority of IFX patients were dose-escalated, evident in the increasing mean normalized dose and the proportion of patients prescribed at least 1 IFX dose ≥8 mg/kg. The mean changes from baseline in CDAI scores were similar between GLM patients and dose-escalated IFX patients, although numerically lower for non-dose-escalated IFX patients.


Disclosure: S. Schwartzman, Janssen, 5, 8, AbbVie, 5, 8, Genentech, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Pfizer, 1, 8, UCB, 5, 8, Amgen, 1, Boston Scientific, 1, Gilead, 1, 5, Medtronic, 1, Myriad, 5, 6, National Psoriasis Foundation, 6; S. Kafka, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 1, 3; D. Conaway, Amgen, 1, Janssen, 1, 2, 3, Pfizer, 1; A. Broadwell, Janssen, 1, 2, 3, Amgen, 1, 2, Novartis, 1, UCB, 1, Pfizer, 1, Sanofi, 1, GSK, 1, Eli Lilly, 1, 2, GSK, 1, Sandoz, 1, Radius, 1, Mallinckrodt, 1, Celgene, 1; S. Black, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, 1, 3; S. Xu, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 1, 2; W. Langholff, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 1, 2; J. Curtis, AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Corrona, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Lilly, 2, 5, Myriad, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Regeneron, 2, 5, Roche, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 5, Sanofi, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Schwartzman S, Kafka S, Conaway D, Broadwell A, Black S, Xu S, Langholff W, Curtis J. Comparative Effectiveness of Intravenous Golimumab vs Dose-Escalated Infliximab in a Real World Population of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: 52-Week Data from the AWARE Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-effectiveness-of-intravenous-golimumab-vs-dose-escalated-infliximab-in-a-real-world-population-of-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-52-week-data-from-the-aware-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-effectiveness-of-intravenous-golimumab-vs-dose-escalated-infliximab-in-a-real-world-population-of-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-52-week-data-from-the-aware-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology