ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1205

Comparative Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 Vaccines Against COVID-19 Infection Among Patients with Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases

Claire Cook1, Naomi Patel2, Xiaoqing Fu1, Xiaosong Wang3, Yumeko Kawano3, Kathleen Vanni3, Grace Qian3, Emily Banasiak3, Emily Kowalski3, Hyon Choi4, yuqing zhang5, Jeffrey Sparks6 and Zachary Wallace1, 1Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 2Massachusetts General Hospital, Sale Creek, TN, 3Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 4MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL, Lexington, MA, 5Massachusetts General Hospital, Quincy, MA, 6Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: COVID-19, Epidemiology

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2022

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs) on immunomodulatory medications may be at particular risk for COVID-19 breakthrough infection given uncertain immune response to COVID-19 vaccination. We aimed to assess the comparative effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 among patients with SARDs against COVID-19 infection.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we identified patients with SARDs being treated with DMARDs and/or glucocorticoids in the Massachusetts (MA) system who received at least two doses of either the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) or mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccines between 12/27/2020 and 5/15/2021. Patients who received other or mixed vaccine doses as part of their initial two dose series were excluded. Patients were followed from index date (date of first vaccine dose) until the date of positive SARS-CoV-2 test result (PCR or antigen), death, or end of follow-up (2/22/2022).To account for potential confounding introduced by variation in vaccine administration and availability, and fluctuation of COVID-19 infection rates over time, we divided the study period into two-week time blocks and calculated the time-block specific propensity score for the BNT162b2 vaccine using the logistic regression model that included potential confounders. We compared the risk of COVID-19 breakthrough infection between BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccine recipients using overlap propensity score–weighted cox proportional hazard models.

Results: We identified 9943 SARD patients who received either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273. Demographics and clinical characteristics were similar in both groups prior to weighting: mean age 61 vs. 61 years, female 74% vs 76%, White 82% vs. 85%, most frequent SARD (rheumatoid arthritis, 52% vs. 55%) and treatment (conventional DMARD, 74% vs. 74%) (Table 1). Of 5571 patients who received BNT162b2, 446 had a breakthrough infection (IR 6.83 per 1000 person-months), vs 330 among 4372 mRNA-1273 recipients (IR 6.12 per 1000 person-months) (Table 2). The time-stratified PS weighted rate difference of breakthrough COVID-19 infection for BNT162b2 vs. mRNA-1273 was 0.71 per 1000 person months (95%CI: -0.71, 2.12) with a corresponding weighted hazard ratio of 1.12 (95%CI: 0.90, 1.39) (Figure 1). When patients were censored at the time of a 3rd vaccine or follow-up ended prior to Omicron dominance in MA, there was a trend towards higher breakthrough infection risk with BNT162b2 vs mRNA-1273, though this was not statistically significant (Table 2).

Conclusion: Among SARDs on immunomodulators, the risk of breakthrough COVID-19 infection is low after receiving either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273. However, there was a trend toward greater benefit with mRNA-1273 vs BNT162b2, especially prior to a 3rd vaccine dose and the Omicron wave. These results are similar to previous observations made in the general population1. Ongoing real-world studies are needed to investigate the risk of breakthrough infection among SARDs as vaccination and mitigation strategies, infection rates, and new variants evolve.

1Dickerman et al., N Engl J Med, 2022;386(2):105-115.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: C. Cook, None; N. Patel, FVC Health; X. Fu, None; X. Wang, None; Y. Kawano, None; K. Vanni, None; G. Qian, None; E. Banasiak, None; E. Kowalski, None; H. Choi, Horizon, Allena, LG, Protalix; y. zhang, None; J. Sparks, Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie/Abbott, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead, Inova Diagnostics, Janssen, Optum, Pfizer; Z. Wallace, Sanofi, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), Zenas Biopharma, Shionogi, Horizon.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Cook C, Patel N, Fu X, Wang X, Kawano Y, Vanni K, Qian G, Banasiak E, Kowalski E, Choi H, zhang y, Sparks J, Wallace Z. Comparative Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 Vaccines Against COVID-19 Infection Among Patients with Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-effectiveness-of-bnt162b2-and-mrna-1273-vaccines-against-covid-19-infection-among-patients-with-systemic-autoimmune-rheumatic-diseases/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-effectiveness-of-bnt162b2-and-mrna-1273-vaccines-against-covid-19-infection-among-patients-with-systemic-autoimmune-rheumatic-diseases/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology