ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1841

Clinical Trial Perceptions Among Male Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE): Georgians Organized Against Lupus (GOAL) Cohort

Hilton Mozee1, Charmayne Dunlop-Thomas1, Gaobin Bao1, Kim Schofield2, Jessica Williams3 and S. Sam Lim1, 1Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 2Georgia State Rep. HD 63, Atlanta, GA, 3Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Disparities, education, patient, Health Services Research, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Title: (1840–1861) Health Services Research Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Minority patients are disproportionately affected by SLE. Yet, they are underrepresented in SLE clinical trials compared to White patients. Specifically, patients that identify as male and Black are significantly understudied. We explored racial and gender differences in clinical trial perceptions among a cohort of predominantly Black patients with SLE in Atlanta, Georgia.

Methods: Data from the Georgians Organized Against Lupus (GOAL) cohort were used for this analysis. The GOAL cohort consists of validated SLE patients living in Atlanta, Georgia. Since 2012, SLE patients have been surveyed annually regarding demographics, SLE natural history, treatment, healthcare utilization, and psychosocial factors. For this study, only male patients were assessed. The 2022 GOAL survey included ad-hoc questions that assessed clinical trial knowledge, willingness to participate, and hesitancy in clinical trial enrollment. The Systemic Lupus Activity Questionnaire (SLAQ), Self-administered Brief Index of Lupus Damage (SA-BILD), and self-efficacy, depression, and perceived stress measures were included in this study. Descriptive analysis was used for comparisons.

Results: A total of 47 males responded to the 2022 GOAL Survey; the majority were Black (79% Black, 19% White, 2% Asian) with a mean age 32 years (SD 11.8), mean education of 14 years (SD 2.3), and majority unemployed (59%). The mean disease duration was 16 years (SD 10.6), mean disease activity score was 11 (SD 7.3), and mean organ damage score was 5 (SD 4.4). We found that 47% of male respondents (n=19 Black, n=3 White) were willing to participate in lupus clinical trials. In contrast, about 30% were unwilling to participate, and 38% were unsure if they would participate in a clinical trial. Male willingness to participate was associated with higher disease activity, living in poverty (50%), less instrumental support), and more social isolation, as compared to those unwilling or unsure (Table). Education, marital status, work status, insurance type, physical function, depression, and perceived stress were not associated with willingness to participate in clinical trials among male respondents.

Conclusion: Among a predominantly Black cohort of males with SLE, we found that respondents with more disease activity, fewer resources, and social support appeared more willing to participate in clinical trials. Further efforts are necessary to educate and provide social support to individuals with SLE that are unsure or resistant to clinical trial participation, especially among underrepresented groups, including males. Similar studies have found that clinical trial education, recruitment through lupus support groups, and diversity of clinical trial staff are potential ways to increase trial participation. Further studies of males with SLE are necessary to validate our study findings and provide more knowledge on factors associated with clinical trial hesitancy among this population.

Supporting image 1


Disclosures: H. Mozee: None; C. Dunlop-Thomas: None; G. Bao: None; K. Schofield: None; J. Williams: None; S. Lim: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mozee H, Dunlop-Thomas C, Bao G, Schofield K, Williams J, Lim S. Clinical Trial Perceptions Among Male Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE): Georgians Organized Against Lupus (GOAL) Cohort [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-trial-perceptions-among-male-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-sle-georgians-organized-against-lupus-goal-cohort/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-trial-perceptions-among-male-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-sle-georgians-organized-against-lupus-goal-cohort/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology