ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1465

Clinical Profiling and Antiphospholipid Antibody (aPL) Associations in Indian Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Cohort

Vineeta Shobha1, Liza Rajasekhar2, Sandra Manuel1, Chengappa Kavadichanda3, Ashish J Mathew4, Ranjan Gupta5, Manish Rathi6, Parasar Ghosh7, Saumya Ranjan Tripathy8, Avinash Jain9 and Amita Aggarwal10, 1St. John’s Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, India, 2Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Madhapur, India, 3JIPMER, Pondicherry, Puducherry, India, 4Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, 5All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India, 6PGIMER Chandigarh, Chandigarh, India, 7Govt of West Bengal, Kolkata, India, Kolkata, West Bengal, India, 8SCB medical college, Cuttack, India, 9SMS Medical College, Lucknow, India, 10Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: antiphospholipid syndrome, Autoantibody(ies), Mortality, pregnancy, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2022

Title: SLE – Diagnosis, Manifestations, and Outcomes Poster II: Manifestations

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Antiphospholipid Antibody (aPL) are described in 11-40% of patients with SLE. Whether the presence of any of the aPLs or combinations thereof, can accurately predict the risk of thrombosis, non-thrombotic events and obstetric outcome in SLE has been debatable. We report the prevalence, associations and outcomes in SLE patients with aPL.

Methods: From the ongoing prospective INdian SLE inception cohort (INSPIRE) data was extracted for SLE patients for whom complete data was available for all the five routinely performed aPL- lupus anticoagulant (LAC), IgG and IgM isotypes for anticardiolipin antibody(aCL) and anti-β2-glycoprotein-I (β2GPI) at enrolment. Patients were categorised into no aPL, triple positive [positive for all 3; LAC, aCL (IgG and or IgM), anti-β2-GPI (IgG and or IgM)], dual positive (any 2 of 3; LAC / aCL / β2-GPI) and isolated aPL positive. The aPL antibodies methodology and cut offs were as per recommendations (1,2). Patients with thrombotic, non-criteria/ non-thrombotic events (NTE) and obstetric outcomes were analysed for associations and compared against those who were negative for all aPL. Odds ratio (OR) adjusted for age, gender and SLEDAI was calculated for all variables except obstetric manifestations, where OR was adjusted for age and SLEDAI.

1.Update of the guidelines for lupus anticoagulant detection 7(10),1737–1740
2.International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome J.Thromb. Haemost. 2006,4,295–306

Results: We analysed 1023 patients (92.6% women), mean age 28.7 ± 10.1 years including 105(10.3%) children. 36 (3.5%) were identified as triple positive and at least one aPL antibody was detected in 358(35%). Overall, the aPL positive group had significant association with gangrene, myocardial infarction, stroke, 2nd trimester miscarriage, thrombocytopenia and autoimmune hemolytic anaemia (p< 0.05). Fig1

There were 82 thrombotic events in 66 patients (6.5%) in our cohort and thrombotic events were associated with presence of LAC [aOR 1.78(1.0,3.17)] and β2-GPI [aOR 2.23(1.04,4.78)]. Tab 1

There were 984 conceptions in 456 women, averaging 2.1 conceptions per woman. There were 194 obstetric events of interest and were significantly associated with at least one aPL positivity [aOR 1.473(0.98,2.19)]. Low birth weight had high odds with triple positivity [aOR 2.708(1.01,7.39)] and 2nd trimester miscarriages with presence of LAC [aOR 3.213(1.19,8.62)]. Tab 2

Amongst the non-criteria events, AIHA had higher odds of occurrence with LAC [aOR 1.80(1.09,2.97)], dual positivity [aOR 2.18(1.51,3.16)], thrombocytopenia with dual positivity [aOR 2.98(1.85,4.8)] and any NTE with LAC [aOR 1.63(1.01,2.65)]. Tab1

There were 44/1023(4.3%) deaths in this cohort, 22/358(6.1%) in the aPL group and 22/ 665(3.3%) in the non-APS group, hazard ratio being [1.91(1.04,3.51)] in those with at least one aPL positivity and [3.18(1.46,6.87)] in dual positives after adjusting for age, gender and SLEDAI.

Conclusion: Antiphospholipid antibodies are present in nearly one-third of patients in INSPIRE cohort and their presence increases the risk of thrombotic events, adverse foetal outcomes, non- thrombotic events and mortality.

Supporting image 1

Figure 1: Association between Antiphospholipid Antibodies with various clinical events (p<0.05, aORs).
Abbreviation: LA – Lupus Anticoagulant, Pos – Positive, T2 Spontaneous Abortion – Spontaneous Abortion in 2nd Trimester, LBW- Low Birth Weight, APS- Antiphospholipid Syndrome, AIHA- Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia, TCP- Thrombocytopenia.

Supporting image 2

Table 1: aPL Antibodies and their associations with thrombotic and non-criteria APS manifestations .
Only significant values are reported, * denotes p<0.05, Adjusted Odds Ratio with confidence Interval denoted as [aOR(C.I)]; adjusted for age and gender and SLEDAI. Abbreviation: AIHA - Autoimmune Hemolytic anaemia, APS - antiphospholipid syndrome.

Supporting image 3

Table 2: aPL Antibodies and their associations with obstetric manifestations.
Only significant values are reported, * denotes p<0.05, Adjusted Odds Ratio with confidence Interval denoted as [aOR (C.I)]; adjusted for age and SLEDAI.
**For Stillbirth, aOR is not calculated due to small sample size.
Abbreviation: IUD – Intrauterine death, LBW – Low birth weight, Gestational HTN – Gestational hypertension.


Disclosures: V. Shobha, None; L. Rajasekhar, None; S. Manuel, None; C. Kavadichanda, None; A. Mathew, None; R. Gupta, None; M. Rathi, None; P. Ghosh, None; S. Tripathy, None; A. Jain, None; A. Aggarwal, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Shobha V, Rajasekhar L, Manuel S, Kavadichanda C, Mathew A, Gupta R, Rathi M, Ghosh P, Tripathy S, Jain A, Aggarwal A. Clinical Profiling and Antiphospholipid Antibody (aPL) Associations in Indian Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Cohort [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-profiling-and-antiphospholipid-antibody-apl-associations-in-indian-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-sle-cohort/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-profiling-and-antiphospholipid-antibody-apl-associations-in-indian-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-sle-cohort/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology