ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1061

Clinical Phenotypes and Disease Burden Of Discoid Lupus Erythematosus In a Sample Of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients In The Southeastern United States

Leslie Anne Cassidy1, Gaobin Bao2, Charmayne M. Dunlop-Thomas3, S. Sam Lim4 and Cristina Drenkard5,6, 1Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 2Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 3Medicine Rheumatology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 4Emory University School of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Atlanta, GA, 5Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 6Epidemiology, Emory Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: African-Americans, cutaneous lupus erythematosus and population studies, SLE

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Epidemiology and Health Services II & III

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: The rash of discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) has been reported in 10-25% of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Prior reports suggest that DLE may be protective against severe disease in SLE; however, most studies have consisted of convenience samples of predominantly White patients. Although the incidence and prevalence of SLE is 3-4 times higher among individuals of African descent, and recent findings suggest that Blacks are more susceptible to DLE than Whites, no study has yet been conducted with a representative sample of Black SLE patients. We examined the association of DLE with clinical manifestations and disease outcomes in a predominantly Black community-based cohort of SLE patients in the Southeastern United States.

Methods: Data was collected from the Wave 1 (2011-12) annual survey of Georgians Organized Against Lupus (GOAL). GOAL is a large prospective cohort of validated SLE patients primarily derived from the Georgia Lupus Registry (GLR), a population-based registry of lupus patients in Atlanta, Georgia. GOAL includes patients of the full sociodemographic spectrum and collects self-reported data on health status, disease activity, and organ damage. SLE was defined by the presence of at least 4 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, or 3 ACR criteria and a diagnosis of SLE by a rheumatologist. DLE was assessed by chart review according to dermatologist or rheumatologist clinical evaluation with or without biopsy confirmation. We examined the association of DLE with clinical features and disease status, calculating the OR and 95% CI adjusted for demographic variables and disease duration.

Results: Among 767 SLE patients, 196 (26%) had DLE. DLE was present in 168/597 (28%) Blacks versus 25/156 (16%) Whites (p=0.008), and 18/45 (40%) males versus 178/722 (25%) females (p=0.02). Mean educational attainment (years) was 13.7 (SD 2.8) and 14.4 (SD 2.9) in patients with and without DLE, respectively (p=0.004), and mean disease duration (years) was 15.5 (SD 10.4) and 12.6 (SD 8.1) in these two respective groups (p=0.0001).

Association of DLE with Clinical Manifestations and Disease Outcomes

         Characteristics

Discoid Rash

   Yes (n=196)   No (n=571)

 Adjusted OR (95%CI)^

Clinical Manifestations+

Malar rash

91 (46.4)

183 (32)

1.84 (1.29-2.63)

Photosensitivity

86 (43.9)

153 (26.8)

2.31 (1.60-3.32)

Oral ulcers

71 (36.2)

154 (27)

1.66 (1.15-2.40)

Arthritis

149 (76)

448 (78.5)

0.84 (0.56-1.26)

Serositis

77 (39.3)

226 (39.6)

0.94 (0.66-1.34)

Renal Disorder

56 (28.6)

180 (31.5)

0.84 (0.57-1.23)

Neurologic Disorder

13 (6.6)

61 (10.7)

0.46 (0.23-0.90)

Hematologic Disorder

137 (69.9)

391 (68.5)

0.98 (0.67-1.42)

Immunologic Disorder

119 (60.7)

396 (69.4)

0.66 (0.46-0.95)

Antinuclear Antibody

178 (90.8)

512 (89.7)

1.20 (0.66-2.18)

Renal Involvement*

63 (32.1)

220 (38.5)

0.68 (0.46-0.99)

Disease Outcomes

Health Status

    Excellent/Very Good (ref)

24 (12.6)

85 (15.5)

–

    Good

61 (32.1)

187 (34.1)

1.05 (0.60-1.85)

    Fair/Poor

105 (55.3)

277 (50.5)

1.14 (0.67-1.96)

Disease Activity Score (SLAQ)

   Mild (0-10) (ref)

45 (23.7)

158 (28.7)

–

   Moderate (11-16)

43 (22.6)

122 (22.2)

1.26 (0.76-2.07)

   Severe (17+)

102 (53.7)

270 (49.1)

1.29 (0.85-1.97)

Organ Damage Score (BILD)

    No Damage (ref)

36 (18.9)

162 (29.5)

–

    Mild (1-2)

75 (39.5)

206 (37.5)

1.38 (0.87-2.21)

    Severe (3+)

79 (41.6)

182 (33.1)

1.41 (0.87-2.28)

Values are depicted as number (%) of individuals unless otherwise specified.  ^Adjusted for gender, race, education, age at diagnosis, and disease duration.  +With the exception of renal involvement, clinical manifestations are defined according to the ACR Criteria for the Classification of SLE.   *Defined as positive proteinuria or red blood cell casts, lupus nephritis stated by rheumatologist or nephrologist (with or without renal biopsy), or end stage renal disease (ESRD) secondary to lupus nephritis.

Conclusion: DLE occurred in 26% of SLE patients, suggesting a stronger association of discoid rash with systemic manifestations than formerly believed. Males and Blacks were primarily affected. Consistent with prior studies, we found an association of DLE with non-specific cutaneous manifestations in SLE patients. Notably, DLE appears to be protective of renal and neurological involvement. Our findings may reflect more accurately the true epidemiology of DLE in high-risk SLE populations given the demographic makeup of this community-based cohort. Despite differences in clinical phenotypes, disease outcomes were similar in patients with and without DLE. Over 50% of patients reported poor health, organ damage, or severe disease activity, regardless of the presence of DLE. Our data suggest that environmental factors play a major role in outcomes of high-risk SLE patients.



Disclosure:

L. A. Cassidy,
None;

G. Bao,
None;

C. M. Dunlop-Thomas,
None;

S. S. Lim,

GlaxoSmithKline,

2;

C. Drenkard,

GlaxoSmithKline,

2.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-phenotypes-and-disease-burden-of-discoid-lupus-erythematosus-in-a-sample-of-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-patients-in-the-southeastern-united-states/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology