ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1639

Clinical Outcomes for Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Receiving Tofacitinib Monotherapy in the Open-Label Long-Term Extension over 6 Years

Roy Fleischmann1, Yusuf Yazici2, Jürgen Wollenhaupt3, Lisy Wang4, Anna Maniccia5, Kenneth Kwok4, Liza Takiya5 and Ronald van Vollenhoven6, 1Rheumatology, Metroplex Clinical Research Center, Dallas, TX, 2New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY, 3Teaching Hospital of the University of Hamburg, Schoen-Klinik Hamburg-Eilbek, Hamburg, Germany, 4Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT, 5Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, 6The Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: DMARDs, Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Safety, tofacitinib and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Treatment options delivering sustained efficacy when given as monotherapy in RA are limited.1 Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of RA. Tofacitinib monotherapy demonstrated efficacy in adult patients (pts) with RA in two index studies (ORAL Solo2 and Start3). Open-label, long-term extension (LTE) studies enrolled pts to evaluate safety and efficacy of tofacitinib monotherapy and combination therapy. Here we present data up to Month (Mo) 84 for safety and Mo 60 for efficacy for pts who stayed on tofacitinib monotherapy in LTE studies.

Methods: Data were pooled from two tofacitinib LTE studies (NCT00413699 [ongoing; database unlocked as of Apr 2014 data cut-off] and NCT00661661). Pts from Phase (P) 1/2/3 tofacitinib index studies received tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID) as monotherapy or with background csDMARD in LTE. For tofacitinib and permitted concomitant RA medications, dose adjustments were allowed for inadequate efficacy or safety reasons. In this analysis, pts were assigned to tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID groups based on average total daily dose in LTE (<15 mg/day or ≥15 mg/day, respectively). Monotherapy was defined as those pts who received tofacitinib without other DMARDs (except antimalarials) throughout the LTE. Baseline (BL) values were those of the index studies for pts enrolling in LTE within 14 days of index study; for all others, BL was start of LTE. Safety was evaluated up to Mo 84 and efficacy to Mo 60 due to limited sample size.

Results: 1808 pts initiated LTE on tofacitinib monotherapy; 1638 (91%) stayed on monotherapy throughout LTE (504 on 5 mg BID; 1134 on 10 mg BID). For pts staying on monotherapy, mean (max) treatment duration was 1157 (2522) and 788 (2104) days for 5 and 10 mg, respectively. Efficacy responses for tofacitinib monotherapy were stable up to Mo 60 (Table 1). In 5 and 10 mg groups, 68% and 88% of pts, respectively, stayed on initial dose throughout LTE. Proportion of pts staying on steroids decreased from 56% to 39% and 41% to 23%, respectively, from baseline to Mo 60. Rates of discontinuation due to lack of efficacy and adverse events (AE), and of serious infection and malignancies (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) were low (Table 2).

Conclusion: In this analysis of pts receiving tofacitinib monotherapy in LTE studies, over 90% of pts stayed on monotherapy, most did not have tofacitinib dose adjustments or add a DMARD, and efficacy was sustained over 60 months, with low rates of discontinuations due to lack of efficacy or AEs.

References: 1. Smolen JS et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2014; 73: 492-509; 2. Fleischmann R et al. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 495-507; 3. Lee EB et al. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 2377-2386.

Table 1: Efficacy responses over time in patients receiving tofacitinib monotherapy

Tofacitinib 5 mg BID

Tofacitinib 10 mg BID

ACR20, % (N)

ACR50, % (N)

Change from baseline in DAS28-4(ESR) score, mean (N)

Change from baseline in HAQ-DI score, mean (N)

ACR20, % (N)

ACR50, % (N)

Change from baseline in DAS28-4(ESR) score, mean (N)

Change from baseline in HAQ-DI score, mean (N)

Month 3

81.0

(483)

58.6

(483)

-2.7

(473)

-0.64

(477)

80.1

(1087)

59.8

(1087)

-2.9

(1067)

-0.75

(1078)

Month 6

79.8

(470)

58.1

(470)

-2.7

(455)

-0.63

(461)

79.5

(1060)

60.5

(1060)

-2.9

(1043)

-0.74

(1050)

Month 9

84.2

(450)

61.8

(450)

-2.8

(442)

-0.65

(443)

79.5

(1024)

59.4

(1024)

-2.9

(1008)

-0.75

(1011)

Month 12

82.8

(436)

62.6

(436)

-2.8

(431)

-0.66

(428)

81.9

(986)

61.4

(986)

-3.0

(964)

-0.75

(978)

Month 24

86.9

(365)

69.0

(365)

-2.9

(359)

-0.67

(359)

76.8

(529)

58.4

(529)

-2.9

(517)

-0.67

(522)

Month 36

87.9

(331)

66.8

(331)

-2.9

(326)

-0.64

(324)

78.8

(392)

57.9

(392)

-3.0

(385)

-0.65

(390)

Month 48

87.7

(187)

67.4

(187)

-3.1

(180)

-0.67

(183)

78.0

(141)

52.5

(141)

-3.0

(137)

-0.65

(140)

Month 60

87.8

(115)

69.6

(115)

-3.0

(115)

-0.64

(113)

66.7

(24)

25.0

(24)

-2.5

(24)

-0.54

(24)

ACR, American College of Rheumatology response; BID, twice daily; DAS28, disease activity score; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index; N, number of evaluable patients

Table 2: Summary of discontinuations, serious infections, and malignancies (excluding NMSC) in patients receiving tofacitinib monotherapy up to data cut-off

Tofacitinib 5 mg BID

N=504

Tofacitinib 10 mg BID

N=1134

Tofacitinib exposure, patient-years

1612

2476

Discontinuations, n (%)

217 (43.1)

323 (28.5)

Due to lack of efficacy

16 (3.2)

16 (1.4)

Due to AEs

108 (21.4)

152 (13.4)

IR (95% CI) of discontinuations due to AEs

7.1 (5.8, 8.5)

6.2 (5.2, 7.2)

IR (95% CI) of serious infection

2.9 (2.2, 3.9)

2.4 (1.9, 3.1)

IR (95% CI) of malignancies (excluding NMSC)

1.0 (0.6, 1.6)

0.7 (0.4, 1.1)

AE, adverse event; BID, twice daily; CI, confidence interval; IR, incidence rate (patients with events per 100 patient-years); NMSC, non-melanoma skin cancer


Disclosure: R. Fleischmann, Pfizer Inc, 2,Pfizer Inc, 5; Y. Yazici, BMS, Celgene, Genentech, 2,BMS, Celgene, Genentech, 5; J. Wollenhaupt, Roche, Chugai Pharma, Pfizer Inc, Abbott, and UCB, 5,Roche, Chugai Pharma, Pfizer Inc, Abbott, and UCB, 8; L. Wang, Pfizer Inc, 3,Pfizer Inc, 1; A. Maniccia, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; K. Kwok, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; L. Takiya, Pfizer Inc, 1,Pfizer Inc, 3; R. van Vollenhoven, Pfizer Inc, 2,Pfizer Inc, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Fleischmann R, Yazici Y, Wollenhaupt J, Wang L, Maniccia A, Kwok K, Takiya L, van Vollenhoven R. Clinical Outcomes for Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Receiving Tofacitinib Monotherapy in the Open-Label Long-Term Extension over 6 Years [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-outcomes-for-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-receiving-tofacitinib-monotherapy-in-the-open-label-long-term-extension-over-6-years/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-outcomes-for-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-receiving-tofacitinib-monotherapy-in-the-open-label-long-term-extension-over-6-years/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology