ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2436

Clinical Effectiveness and Costs of an Integrated Rehabilitation Programme Compared with Outpatient Physiotherapy for Chronic Knee Pain

Mike Hurley1, Dr Nicola E. Walsh2 and Sally Jessep3, 1School of Rehabilitation Sciences, St George's University of London, London, United Kingdom, 2Allied Health Professions, University of the West of England Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom, 3Physiotherapy Out-Patients Department, Kent, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: exercise, Knee, pain, rehabilitation and self-management

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Physical/Occupational Therapy and Exercise in Patients with Rhematologic Disease

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose: Chronic knee pain is a major cause of disability. Management guidelines recommend exercise and self-management interventions. We previously described a rehabilitation programme that integrates exercise and self-management (Enabling Self-Management and Coping with Arthritic Knee Pain through Exercise, ESCAPE-knee pain) that produced short term improvements in pain and physical function. Sustaining these improvements is problematic. In addition, the programme is untried in the community where it is most likely to be delivered. This study evaluated the feasibility of delivering ESCAPE-knee painin a community setting, and compared its clinical effectiveness and costs with Out-Patient Physiotherapy.

Methods: This was a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. 64 people with chronic knee pain were randomised to receive Out-Patient Physiotherapy or the ESCAPE-knee painprogramme in a Local Adult Education Community Centre. Primary outcome was physical function assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Secondary outcomes included pain, objective functional performance, anxiety, depression, exercise-related health beliefs, exercise self-efficacy and healthcare utilisation. All outcomes were assessed at baseline and 12 months after completing the interventions (primary endpoint). ANCOVA investigated between-group differences.

Results: Both groups demonstrated similar improvements in clinical outcomes, except health beliefs and self-efficacy where imporvements were greater in ESCAPE-knee pain participants. Out-Patient Physiotherapy cost £130 per person and its participants had healthcare utilisation costs over one year of £583, the ESCAPE-knee painprogramme cost £64 per person and participant’s healthcare utilisation was £320.

Conclusion: ESCAPE-knee pain and Out-Patient Physiotherapy produced sustained physical and psychosocial benefits, but ESCAPE-knee pain cost less and was more cost-effective. Greater improvements in beliefs about the role of exercise in the management of knee pain, and their confidence in their abilty to perform exercise that will help their knee pain (exercise self-efficacy), may make ESCAPE-knee pain participants more self-reliant and utilise less healthcare resources, thereby accounting for the better cost-effectiveness of ESCAPE-knee pain.


Disclosure:

M. Hurley,
None;

D. N. E. Walsh,
None;

S. Jessep,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-effectiveness-and-costs-of-an-integrated-rehabilitation-programme-compared-with-outpatient-physiotherapy-for-chronic-knee-pain/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology