ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 973

Clinical Characterization of Patients with World Health Organization Group 2 Pulmonary Hypertension in the Pulmonary Hypertension Assessment and Recognition of Outcomes in Scleroderma Cohort

Jessica K. Gordon1, Jackie Szymonifka2, Matthew R. Lammi3, Virginia D. Steen4 and PHAROS Investigators, 1Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 2Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 3Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Pulmonary and Critical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, 4Rheumatology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Cardiovascular disease, hypertension, Pulmonary Involvement, scleroderma and systemic sclerosis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Systemic Sclerosis, Fibrosing Syndromes, and Raynaud's – Clinical Aspects and Therapeutics I

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose:  Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a leading cause of death in patients (pts) with Systemic Sclerosis (SSc). The World Health Organization (WHO) classifies PH into groups: pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH, WHO1); PH secondary to left heart dysfunction or isolated post-capillary PH (WHO2); and PH secondary to pulmonary disease (WHO3). The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of those pts in the PHAROS cohort categorized as WHO2.

Methods:  Pts were enrolled in PHAROS within 6 months of the diagnosis of PH. PH was defined by a mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP)≥25 mmHg on right heart catheterization (RHC.) Pts were categorized as WHO2 if they had a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP)>15 mmHg. Pts with Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) as defined by a forced vital capacity (FVC) <65% predicted and/or significant fibrosis on chest CT with a normal PCWP were included in WHO3. Clinical expertise from the treating centers was also used to categorize pts best, as individuals may have features of more than one group. Statistical analysis was carried out using Shapiro-Wilk, Kruskal-Wallis, Kaplan-Meier and stratified log-rank tests.

Results: There are 335 pts with PH in the PHAROS database: WHO1 – 215, WHO2 – 57, and WHO3 –63. As shown in table 1, WHO2 pts are different from WHO1 but similar to WHO3 pts in that they are more likely to be African American, to have diffuse SSc and to be scl70 positive. WHO2 pts had lower FVC and FVC%/DLCO% ratio than WHO1 pts. They had normal ejection fractions but significantly larger left atrial measurements. WHO2 patients by definition have higher PCWP, which is associated with a lower pulmonary vascular resistance on RHC.  Stratified log-rank tests did not show a significant difference in time to death between the groups, p=0.28. Survivals for 1, 3, and 5 years are shown below in table 2. WHO2 patients had a significantly higher proportion of deaths related to scleroderma than WHO1 (95% v. 70%, p=0.02). The most common cause of death among WHO2 pts was PH (37%) followed by multifactorial causes (26%.) WHO I pts died most commonly from PAH (50%), while the most common cause among WHO III patients was pulmonary fibrosis (46%, p<0.001).

Conclusion: Patients with WHO2 PH have different features that help to separate them from WHO1 pts. Overall survival in the PH pts enrolled in PHAROS has improved over historical values. WHO group classification did not affect survival in these incident patients. However, pts with WHO2 PH were more likely to die from scleroderma-related causes.      

Table 1. Demographics and Clinical Characteristics
Variable

WHO 1

(n=215)

WHO 2

(n=57)

WHO 3

(n=63)

p-value (overall)

p-value (1 v 2)

p-value (1 v 3)

p-value (2 v 3)

Age, yr – mean±SD

60.3±10.5

56.9±11.8

52.6±11.1

<.001

0.039

<.001

0.045

Female – n (%)

177 (84%)

42 (76%)

46 (77%)

0.265

0.193

0.196

0.969

Race – n (%)

 

 

 

0.012

0.022

0.022

0.519

Caucasian

170 (81%)

34 (62%)

35 (59%)

 

 

 

 

Hispanic

11 (5%)

3 (5%)

6 (10%)

 

 

 

 

Black

24 (11%)

15 (27%)

15 (25%)

 

 

 

 

Antibody– n (%)

 

 

 

<.001

0.008

<.001

0.067

Negative

9 (4%)

6 (11%)

4 (6%)

 

 

 

 

Anticentromere

82 (39%)

9 (17%)

4 (6%)

 

 

 

 

Scl 70

12 (6%)

9 (17%)

23 (37%)

 

 

 

 

U1RNP

8 (4%)

2 (4%)

3 (5%)

 

 

 

 

Isolated nucleolar   pattern

51 (24%)

15 (28%)

12 (19%)

 

 

 

 

Polymerase III

9 (4%)

4 (7%)

1 (2%)

 

 

 

 

Mixed or other

39 (19%)

9 (17%)

15 (24%)

 

 

 

 

Scleroderma subtype– n (%)

 

 

 

<.001

0.001

<.001

0.536

Limited

152 (71%)

24 (44%)

27 (44%)

 

 

 

 

Diffuse

55 (26%)

27 (50%)

28 (45%)

 

 

 

 

Other

8 (4%)

3 (6%)

7 (11%)

 

 

 

 

Disease duration, yr

8.2 [3.4, 16.0]

6.8 [3.5, 10.4]

6.8 [3.6, 12.4]

0.305

0.146

0.410

0.625

Echo parameters
sPAP, mmHg – median [IQR]

55.5 [41.0, 72.0]

50.0 [39.5, 63.0]

48.5 [40.0, 60.0]

0.028

0.072

0.021

0.873

Jet velocity – median [IQR]

3.5 [3.0, 4.1]

3.2 [2.7, 3.7]

3.1 [2.9, 3.9]

0.101

0.067

0.148

0.676

Ejection fraction, % – – median [IQR]

60.0 [55.0, 65.0]

60.0 [55.0, 65.0]

60.0 [57.5, 65.0]

0.840

0.588

0.761

0.765

Left atrial measurement, cm – – median [IQR]

3.7 [3.2, 4.2]

4.1 [3.5, 4.6]

3.5 [3.1, 3.9]

0.013

0.037

0.081

0.005

Pericardial effusion present– n (%)

70 (38%)

16 (33%)

13 (23%)

0.129

0.564

0.044

0.251

PFT parameters
FVC % predicted – median [IQR]

79.2 [71.1, 90.0]

72.0 [55.2, 80.5]

49.9 [43.1, 58.6]

<.001

<.001

<.001

<.001

DLCO % predicted – median [IQR]

38.8 [31.9, 51.8]

40.6 [33.2, 51.1]

28.2 [22.9, 36.4]

<.001

0.506

<.001

<.001

TLC % predicted – median [IQR]

81.4 [68.8, 91.8]

73.9 [62.6, 92.8]

53.9 [47.6, 60.8]

<.001

0.080

<.001

<.001

FVC:DLCO ratio – – median [IQR]

2.1 [1.6, 2.6]

1.7 [1.4, 2.2]

1.9 [1.4, 2.3]

0.002

<.001

0.056

0.210

RHC Parameters
sPAP, mmHg – median [IQR]

55.0 [45.0, 72.0]

46.0 [40.0, 56.0]

47.0 [43.0, 64.0]

0.003

0.003

0.026

0.470

mPAP, mmHg – median [IQR]

35.0 [29.0, 43.0]

32.0 [28.0, 38.0]

30.0 [26.0, 38.0]

0.008

0.063

0.005

0.347

PCW, mmHg – – median [IQR]

10.0 [8.0, 12.0]

19.0 [17.0, 23.0]

10.0 [7.0, 14.0]

<.001

<.001

0.760

<.001

Cardiac Output, L/min – median [IQR]

5.0 [3.9, 6.1]

5.6 [4.3, 6.5]

5.0 [4.6, 5.8]

0.201

0.088

0.503

0.248

Pulmonary Vascular Resistance, dynes-sec-cm-5 – median [IQR]

370 [263, 658]

180 [138, 335]

322 [224, 463]

<.001

<.001

0.021

<.001

       

Table 2. 1-, 3- and 5-year survival estimates by WHO Group

WHO Group

n deaths / N (%)

1-year survival estimate (95% CI)

3-year survival estimate (95% CI)

5-year survival estimate (95% CI)

1

86/215 (40%)

92.5%

(88.1% – 95.3%)

73.8%

(67.0% – 79.5%)

58.1%

(50.0% – 65.4%)

2

19/57 (33%)

86.0%

(73.9% – 92.7%)

67.5%

(52.8% – 78.6%)

64.5%

(49.1% – 76.3%)

3

26/63 (41%)

85.6%

(74.1% – 92.2%)

68.4%

(54.4% – 78.9%)

61.1%

(46.3% – 73.0%)

       


Disclosure: J. K. Gordon, None; J. Szymonifka, None; M. R. Lammi, None; V. D. Steen, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gordon JK, Szymonifka J, Lammi MR, Steen VD. Clinical Characterization of Patients with World Health Organization Group 2 Pulmonary Hypertension in the Pulmonary Hypertension Assessment and Recognition of Outcomes in Scleroderma Cohort [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-characterization-of-patients-with-world-health-organization-group-2-pulmonary-hypertension-in-the-pulmonary-hypertension-assessment-and-recognition-of-outcomes-in-scleroderma-cohort/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-characterization-of-patients-with-world-health-organization-group-2-pulmonary-hypertension-in-the-pulmonary-hypertension-assessment-and-recognition-of-outcomes-in-scleroderma-cohort/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology