ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1480

Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Profiles of Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis Who Initiated Secukinumab and Other Biologics: Results from the Corrona Psoriatic Arthritis/Spondyloarthritis (PsA/SpA) Registry

Alexis Ogdie1, Mei Liu 2, Sabrina Rebello 2, Meghan Glynn 3, Blessing Dube 2, Robert McLean 3, Esther Yi 4, Yujin Park 5 and Philip Mease 6, 1Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 2Corrona, LLC, Waltham, MA, 3Corrona, LLC, Waltham, 4Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, 5Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, 6Swedish Medical Center/Providence St Joseph Health, and University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), Biologics and registry

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Poster II: Treatment of Axial Spondyloarthritis & Psoriatic Arthritis

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Secukinumab is the only non–tumor necrosis factor inhibitor biologic therapy approved for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in the United States. Patients with AS in clinical trials who receive biologics, including secukinumab, may not be representative of those treated in real-world clinical practice due to differences in patient characteristics, practice patterns, physician experience, and insurance coverage (ie, access). Few real-world studies have characterized patients with AS who initiate secukinumab. The Corrona PsA/SpA Registry collects data on a robust list of outcome measures, many of which overlap with those used in clinical trials. We aim to describe the characteristics of patients who initiated secukinumab and other biologics for the treatment of AS in the Corrona PsA/SpA Registry.

Methods: This study included patients aged ≥ 18 years with AS (and without concurrent PsA diagnosis) enrolled in the Corrona PsA/SpA Registry who initiated secukinumab or other biologics (adalimumab, etanercept, certolizumab pegol, infliximab, and golimumab) between April 2017 and December 2018. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment profiles, disease activity, quality of life, and work productivity were assessed at the time of biologic initiation (baseline) and compared between patients who initiated secukinumab and other biologics using t tests or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for continuous variables and χ2 or Fisher exact tests for categorical variables.

Results: Of the 106 patients with AS who initiated a biologic, 26 (24.5%) initiated secukinumab and 80 (75.5%) initiated other biologics. Secukinumab initiators were similar to patients who initiated other biologics in terms of demographics and clinical characteristics except that a higher proportion of secukinumab initiators had a history of prior biologic use (69.2% vs 45.0%; P = 0.03) and were more likely to have used a higher number of prior biologics compared with other biologic initiators (P < 0.01; Table 1). No significant differences were observed between patients who initiated secukinumab and other biologics in terms of measures of disease activity, quality of life, and work productivity (Table 2).

Conclusion:

In this real-world study of US patients with AS, secukinumab initiators had similar demographics, clinical outcomes, disease burden and patient reported outcomes compared with other biologic initiators, with the exception of higher prior biologic use.


Disclosure: A. Ogdie, AbbVie, 5, 8, Amgen, 2, 5, 8, BMS, 5, Celgene, 5, 8, Corrona, LLC, 5, Lilly, 5, National Psoriasis Foundation, 2, NIH/NIAMS, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, 7, Pfizer, 2, 5, Rheumatology Research Foundation, 2, Takeda, 5; M. Liu, Corrona, LLC, 3; S. Rebello, Corrona, LLC, 3; M. Glynn, Corrona, LLC, 3; B. Dube, Corrona, LLC, 3; R. McLean, Corrona, LLC, 3; E. Yi, Novartis, 3, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, 3; Y. Park, Novartis, 3; P. Mease, Abbott, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, 2, 5, Abbott, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB, 8, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Abbvie, 2, 5, 8, Abbvie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun, UCB, 5, Abbvie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Genentech, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, 8, Abbvie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun, UCB, 2, AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Genentech, Janssen, Leo, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB., 5, 8, AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Leo, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., and UCB, 2, Abbvie, Amgen, Brsitol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun, UCB, 5, Abbvie, Amgen, Brsitol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Genentech, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, 8, Abbvie, Amgen, Brsitol Myers Squibb,Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun, UCB, 2, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, 8, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Leo, Eli Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, and UCB, 5, BMS, 2, 5, 8, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, 5, Boerhinger Ingelheim, 5, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 8, Bristol Myers Squibb Co., 2, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 6, 8, Celgene, 2, 5, 6, 8, Celgene Corp., 2, 5, 8, CORRONA, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Galapagos, 2, 5, 8, Genentech, 2, 5, 6, 8, Gilead, 2, 5, 8, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, 8, Janssen Inc, 2, 5, 8, Leo, 2, 5, 8, Lilly, 2, 5, 6, 8, Merck, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, 6, Sun, 2, 5, SUN, 2, 5, Sun Pharma, 2, 5, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, 2, 5, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., 2, 5, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 6, 8, UCB Pharma, 2, 5, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ogdie A, Liu M, Rebello S, Glynn M, Dube B, McLean R, Yi E, Park Y, Mease P. Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Profiles of Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis Who Initiated Secukinumab and Other Biologics: Results from the Corrona Psoriatic Arthritis/Spondyloarthritis (PsA/SpA) Registry [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-characteristics-and-treatment-profiles-of-patients-with-ankylosing-spondylitis-who-initiated-secukinumab-and-other-biologics-results-from-the-corrona-psoriatic-arthritis-spondyloarthritis-p/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-characteristics-and-treatment-profiles-of-patients-with-ankylosing-spondylitis-who-initiated-secukinumab-and-other-biologics-results-from-the-corrona-psoriatic-arthritis-spondyloarthritis-p/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology