ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1924

Cell Bound Complement Activation Products Have Higher Sensitivity Than Serum C3 and C4 Levels in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman1, Richard Furie2, Chaim Putterman3, Anka Askanase4, Jill P. Buyon5, Kenneth Kalunian6, W. Winn Chatham7, E Massarotti8, Kyriakos A. Kirou9, A. Weinstein10, Puja Chitkara11, Susan Manzi12, Joe Ahearn13, Leilani Wolover14, John Conklin15, Tyler O'Malley14, Claudia Ibarra15, Derren Barken16 and Thierry Dervieux17, 1FSM-300, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 2Division of Rheumatology, North Shore-LIJ Health System, Great Neck, NY, 3The Division of Rheumatology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, 4Department of Medicine Rhemuatology, Colombia University, New York, NY, 5Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 6UCSD School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, 7University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 8Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 9Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 10Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, 11Internal Medicine, Sharp Memorial Hospital, San Diego, CA, 12Division of Rheumatology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, 13Internal Medicine, West Penn Allegheny Health System, Pittsburgh, PA, 14Research and Development, Exagen Diagnostics, Inc., Vista, CA, 151261 Liberty Way Suite C, Exagen Diagnostics, Inc., Vista, CA, 16Exagen Diagnostics, Inc., Vista, CA, 17rd, Exagen Diagnostics, Inc., Vista, CA

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: complement, diagnosis and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects and Treatment: Biomarkers in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Elevated levels of cell bound complement activation products (CBCAPS) have been established as valuable biomarkers in the diagnosis of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). In this study, we compared the sensitivity of CBCAPS to reduced complement C3 and C4 proteins levels in SLE. We also evaluated the relationship between elevated CBCAPS, reduced complement levels and SLE disease activity.

Methods: A total 288 SLE patients (mean age 41±1 years, 92% females) all meeting the 1982 American College of Rheumatology SLE classification criteria were enrolled. Serum complement C3 and C4 protein levels were determined using immunoturbidimetry while complement C4d fragment deposited on erythrocytes (EC4d) and B-lymphocytes (BC4d) were determined using flow cytometry (and expressed as net mean fluorescence intensity [MFI]). A group of 476 subjects comprising 274 patients with other rheumatic diseases and 202 healthy subjects was used to establish the cutoffs yielding 95% specificity for C3, C4, EC4d and BC4d. Among SLE subjects, disease activity was determined using the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index SELENA Modification (SELENA-SLEDAI) subscore (without low complement and anti-dsDNA reactivity components). Difference in sensitivity (while controlling for similar specificity) was evaluated using χ2 test.

Results : Reduced C3 or C4 were both 32% sensitive for SLE (95% specific). In contrast, EC4d at a cutoff above 14 net MFI yielded 45% sensitivity (95% specific) while BC4d above 60 net MFI yielded 54% sensitivity (95% specific) (p<0.002). Elevated EC4d or BC4d (above their respective cutoffs as above) yielded a 22% higher sensitivity (66%) than reduced C3 or C4 (44%). Among 273 SLE patients with evaluable SELENA-SLEDAI subscores, the median subscore was 1 (range 0-23). Higher level of disease activity resulted in a higher proportion of patients testing positive for elevated CBCAPS (p=0.027) and reduced complement (p=0.002) (Figure). Among SLE with less active disease (SELENA-SLEDAI subscore=0) the difference in sensitivity was 26% greater for elevated CBCAPS (62%) than for reduced complement C3 or C4 (36%) (p<0.001). The difference in sensitivity remained higher (17%) for CBCAPS compared to low complement among SLE having a SELENA-SLEDAI subscore greater than 6 points but without reaching statistical significance (p=0.21).

Conclusion : Among all SLE patients, elevated CBCAPS have higher sensitivity than reduced C3 or C4. The higher sensitivity of CBCAPS is particularly significant among SLE with less active disease, and this supports the diagnostic utility of these markers for SLE


Disclosure:

R. Ramsey-Goldman,
None;

R. Furie,

Exagen,

2;

C. Putterman,

Exagen,

2,

Exagen,

5;

A. Askanase,

Exagen,

2;

J. P. Buyon,

Exagen,

2;

K. Kalunian,

Exagen,

2,

Exagen,

5;

W. W. Chatham,
None;

E. Massarotti,
None;

K. A. Kirou,
None;

A. Weinstein,

Exagen,

1,

Exagen,

6,

EXagen,

5;

P. Chitkara,

Exagen,

8;

S. Manzi,

EXagen,

5,

Exagen,

7;

J. Ahearn,

Exagen,

5,

Exagen,

7;

L. Wolover,

Exagen,

3;

J. Conklin,

Exagen,

3;

T. O’Malley,

Exagen,

3;

C. Ibarra,

Exagen,

3;

D. Barken,

Exagen,

3;

T. Dervieux,

Exagen,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/cell-bound-complement-activation-products-have-higher-sensitivity-than-serum-c3-and-c4-levels-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology