ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 331

Case Series: Comparison of Repository Corticotropin Injection (H.P. Acthar Gel) Versus Glucocorticoids on Bone Density in SLE Patients

Anny T. Wu1 and Joshua June2, 1Rheumatology, Franciscan Alliance, Munster, IN, 23394 E Jolly Rd Ste C, Great Lakes Center of Rheumatology, Lansing, MI

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Bone density, DXA, glucocorticoids and osteoporosis, SLE

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Disease – Clinical Aspects and Pathogenesis Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Repository Corticotropin Injection (RCI) is an adrenocorticotropin hormone in 16% gelatin with a prolonged release after intramuscular (IM) or subcutaneous injection. Adverse effects of RCI are primarily related to its steroidogenic effects including decrease in BMD. However, there is recent renewed interest in RCI’s role as an alternative to high dose glucocorticoids and as last resort therapy for SLE.

Methods: This retrospective case series looks at the bone density changes of 5 adult female patients with mean age of 59 years on RCI vs. glucocorticoids at a Rheumatology practice. A list of 73 patients on RCI was populated using the EMR. Chart review was performed and patients were selected with the following criteria: on RCI for at least 6 months, history of SLE, verifiable DXA scan results from before and after starting RCI. Patients were then excluded if they had been on bone sparing agents during this time interval. The bone with the lowest density on the DXA report post-RCI is selected for comparison to the pre-RCI BMD. The lowest significant change of each BMD value is operator dependent and is within 95% confidence interval based on the certified technologist’s past DXAs. The same technologist performed all of the above DXAs. An example is as follows: for this particular technologist, her range of lowest significant change (at 95% confidence interval) in measurement of the femoral neck is plus or minus 0.010 gm/cm^2. If the difference in BMD of the femoral neck falls outside of this range on a latter DXA, then there is indeed a significant change.

Results: Two of the 5 patients had nonsignificant changes to their BMD before and after starting RCI. Two patients had a decrease in BMD that were significant but were noted to have been on higher doses of Prednisone (10mg and/or 20mg a day) and received more IM glucocorticoid injections. One patient had an increased BMD, although for her, RCI was started just 3 months prior to her latter DXA. Her third DXA scan 2 years later did show a significant decrease in BMD but she, too, had received more glucocorticoid IM injections.

Conclusion: These cases illustrate the possibility that RCI by itself does not contribute to significant BMD decrease. Rather, significant decrease in BMD is seen in those patients who have concurrently received more oral, IM or intra-articular glucocorticoids while on RCI. Although RCI may be understood to have similar side effects as glucocorticoids, we see a possible difference in side effects such as BMD decrease as compared to glucocorticoids.


Disclosure: A. T. Wu, None; J. June, Mallinckrodt, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Wu AT, June J. Case Series: Comparison of Repository Corticotropin Injection (H.P. Acthar Gel) Versus Glucocorticoids on Bone Density in SLE Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/case-series-comparison-of-repository-corticotropin-injection-h-p-acthar-gel-versus-glucocorticoids-on-bone-density-in-sle-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/case-series-comparison-of-repository-corticotropin-injection-h-p-acthar-gel-versus-glucocorticoids-on-bone-density-in-sle-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology