ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2803

Can Ultrasonographic Findings Predict Response To Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Inhibitor Treatment In Rheumatoid Arthritis?

Nevsun Inanc1,2, Gülsen Ozen2 and Haner Direskeneli3, 1Department of Rheumatology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey, 2Rheumatology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey, 3Rheumatology, Marmara University, School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: anti-TNF therapy, prognostic factors, remission, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ultrasonography

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Imaging in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNFi) are highly effective in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), while not effective in all, with predictors of response being necessary. Although genetic, inflammatory and serologic biomarkers are under major investigation for this purpose, little is known about the predictive value of ultrasonographic parameters in RA. We aimed to investigate the ability of ultrasonographic parameters to predict which patients with RA will benefit from the treatment with TNFi in terms of EULAR response.

Methods : Biologic naive RA patients starting treatment with TNFi were examined longitudinally by ultrasonography (US) (both Gray–Scale [GS] and Power Doppler [PD]) of 28 joints according to standard scans of EULAR guideline and clinically (tender/swollen joint counts, DAS28 and HAQ scores) at baseline and after 3 and 6 months. US examinations were performed by an experienced  sonographer (NI) using a MyLab 70 US machine (Esaote, Italy) equipped with 6-18 and 4-13 MHz broad band multi–frequency linear transducer. US synovitis GS and PD signals were semiquantitatively graded from 0 to 3. Total PD and GS synovitis scores of all sites are recorded as sum scores of PD and GS, respectively. The clinical response was evaluated according to the EULAR response criteria at 3rd month.  Potential ultrasonographic predictors of response were identified using multivariate binary logistic regression models.

Results : The study cohort consisted of 42 RA patients (F/M=33/9, mean age 49.0±10.7 years) with a mean disease duration of 9.1±7.5 years and mean baseline DAS28 score of 5.5±1.0. Rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (CCP) positivity were 76.2% and 64.3%, respectively. Baseline characteristics of TNFi responders (30/42) and non–responders (12/42) are shown in Table 1. Swollen joint count (p= 0.05), sum scores of baseline PD (p= 0.048), GS (p= 0.048) and PD+GS (p= 0.046) differed significantly between responders and non–responders. Baseline PD sum score was the only ultrasonographic parameter in the multivariate analysis predicting which patients achieve good/moderate EULAR response with TNFi at 3rd month (p= 0.004). The mean PD+GS, PD and GS sum scores decreased significantly from baseline to 3 months (p<0.001 for all parameters) whereas decrease between 3rd and 6th months was nonsignificant for all US parameters (p=0.128, p=0.266, p= 0.105, respectively).

Conclusion : Our data underline that baseline PD scores, despite similar clinical features,  can predict which patients will respond to TNFi therapy. Ultrasonographic response to TNFi treatment can be achieved substantially in the first 3 months. Beyond 3rd month changes in US scores are mostly nonsignificant.

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of TNFi responders and nonresponders

Responders (n=30)

Non–responders (n=12)

p Value

Age (years)

48.8±10.6

49.6±11.5

0.81

Disease duration (years)

8.0±7.2

11.9±7.8

0.13

Treatment delay (months)

32.2±51.0

35.2±38.2

0.85

RF titer (IU/mL)

166.4±233.9

295.1±586.8

0.31

Anti- CCP titer (U/mL)

78.7±147.0

232.2±457.5

0.10

DAS28

5.5±0.9

5.5±1.3

0.99

Pain VAS (0-100 mm)

66.0±21.7

79.2±16.7

0.067

ESR (mm/h)

43.7±20.7

40.0±22.5

0.61

CRP (mg/L)

27.2±34.1

28.6±28.4

0.90

Tender joint count (0-28)

8.0±6.8

12.0±9.5

0.12

Swollen joint count (0-28)

5.7±5.0

9.8±7.8

0.05

HAQ score

1.1±0.6

1.3±0.4

0.22

Prednisolone dose, mg/day

5.7±3.1

5.8±2.2

0.93

Sum score of PD (0-84)

12.5±9.8

20.1±13.2

0.048

Sum score of GS (0-84)

16.1±11.7

25.7±15.6

0.048

Sum score of PD+GS (0-168)

29.0±21.4

45.6±28.5

0.046

The values were presented as mean±SD


Disclosure:

N. Inanc,
None;

G. Ozen,
None;

H. Direskeneli,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/can-ultrasonographic-findings-predict-response-to-tumor-necrosis-factor-%ce%b1-inhibitor-treatment-in-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology