ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meeting Abstracts
    • All Meetings
    • PRSYM 2026
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • Download Abstract Supplements
  • Keyword Index
  • My Favorites
    • View & print my favorites
  • Search

Home » Meeting Abstracts » ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2013

Abstract Number: 2803

Can Ultrasonographic Findings Predict Response To Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Inhibitor Treatment In Rheumatoid Arthritis?

Nevsun Inanc1,2, Gülsen Ozen2 and Haner Direskeneli3, 1Department of Rheumatology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey, 2Rheumatology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey, 3Rheumatology, Marmara University, School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey

Share on X (Twitter) Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Email
Print

Meeting: ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2013

Keywords: anti-TNF therapy, prognostic factors, remission, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ultrasonography

Session Information

Title: Imaging in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNFi) are highly effective in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), while not effective in all, with predictors of response being necessary. Although genetic, inflammatory and serologic biomarkers are under major investigation for this purpose, little is known about the predictive value of ultrasonographic parameters in RA. We aimed to investigate the ability of ultrasonographic parameters to predict which patients with RA will benefit from the treatment with TNFi in terms of EULAR response.

Methods : Biologic naive RA patients starting treatment with TNFi were examined longitudinally by ultrasonography (US) (both Gray–Scale [GS] and Power Doppler [PD]) of 28 joints according to standard scans of EULAR guideline and clinically (tender/swollen joint counts, DAS28 and HAQ scores) at baseline and after 3 and 6 months. US examinations were performed by an experienced  sonographer (NI) using a MyLab 70 US machine (Esaote, Italy) equipped with 6-18 and 4-13 MHz broad band multi–frequency linear transducer. US synovitis GS and PD signals were semiquantitatively graded from 0 to 3. Total PD and GS synovitis scores of all sites are recorded as sum scores of PD and GS, respectively. The clinical response was evaluated according to the EULAR response criteria at 3rd month.  Potential ultrasonographic predictors of response were identified using multivariate binary logistic regression models.

Results : The study cohort consisted of 42 RA patients (F/M=33/9, mean age 49.0±10.7 years) with a mean disease duration of 9.1±7.5 years and mean baseline DAS28 score of 5.5±1.0. Rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (CCP) positivity were 76.2% and 64.3%, respectively. Baseline characteristics of TNFi responders (30/42) and non–responders (12/42) are shown in Table 1. Swollen joint count (p= 0.05), sum scores of baseline PD (p= 0.048), GS (p= 0.048) and PD+GS (p= 0.046) differed significantly between responders and non–responders. Baseline PD sum score was the only ultrasonographic parameter in the multivariate analysis predicting which patients achieve good/moderate EULAR response with TNFi at 3rd month (p= 0.004). The mean PD+GS, PD and GS sum scores decreased significantly from baseline to 3 months (p<0.001 for all parameters) whereas decrease between 3rd and 6th months was nonsignificant for all US parameters (p=0.128, p=0.266, p= 0.105, respectively).

Conclusion : Our data underline that baseline PD scores, despite similar clinical features,  can predict which patients will respond to TNFi therapy. Ultrasonographic response to TNFi treatment can be achieved substantially in the first 3 months. Beyond 3rd month changes in US scores are mostly nonsignificant.

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of TNFi responders and nonresponders

Responders (n=30)

Non–responders (n=12)

p Value

Age (years)

48.8±10.6

49.6±11.5

0.81

Disease duration (years)

8.0±7.2

11.9±7.8

0.13

Treatment delay (months)

32.2±51.0

35.2±38.2

0.85

RF titer (IU/mL)

166.4±233.9

295.1±586.8

0.31

Anti- CCP titer (U/mL)

78.7±147.0

232.2±457.5

0.10

DAS28

5.5±0.9

5.5±1.3

0.99

Pain VAS (0-100 mm)

66.0±21.7

79.2±16.7

0.067

ESR (mm/h)

43.7±20.7

40.0±22.5

0.61

CRP (mg/L)

27.2±34.1

28.6±28.4

0.90

Tender joint count (0-28)

8.0±6.8

12.0±9.5

0.12

Swollen joint count (0-28)

5.7±5.0

9.8±7.8

0.05

HAQ score

1.1±0.6

1.3±0.4

0.22

Prednisolone dose, mg/day

5.7±3.1

5.8±2.2

0.93

Sum score of PD (0-84)

12.5±9.8

20.1±13.2

0.048

Sum score of GS (0-84)

16.1±11.7

25.7±15.6

0.048

Sum score of PD+GS (0-168)

29.0±21.4

45.6±28.5

0.046

The values were presented as mean±SD


Disclosure:

N. Inanc,
None;

G. Ozen,
None;

H. Direskeneli,
None.

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/can-ultrasonographic-findings-predict-response-to-tumor-necrosis-factor-%ce%b1-inhibitor-treatment-in-rheumatoid-arthritis/

My Favorites

Save and print abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract (must have cookies enabled in browser). See saved favorites.

Abstract Policies

  • ACR Convergence Abstract Embargo Policies
  • ACR Convergence Abstract Permissions & Reprints
  • PRSYM Abstract Policies

ACR Convergence. Where Rheumatology Meets

ACR Convergence 2026

Join us November 6-11 in Orlando, Florida.
See Registration Information

  • Contact ACR
  • Privacy Policy
  • ACR Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2026 American College of Rheumatology