ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2575

Can Immunosuppressive Therapy Be Safely Discontinued in Patients with Lupus Nephritis?

Paola Vidal1, Javier Narvaez-García2, Francesc-Xavier Fulladosa2, Francesca Mitjavila2, olga Capdevila2, Pol Maymó3, Judith Palacios4 and Joan Miquel Nolla2, 1Hospital Universtiario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain, 2Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain, 3Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge., Barcelona, Spain, 4Bellvitge University Hospital, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, Spain

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Lupus nephritis, Response Criteria, risk factors, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 18, 2024

Title: Abstracts: SLE – Treatment II: Non-Cellular Lupus Therapeutics

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 1:00PM-2:30PM

Background/Purpose: The latest guidelines for managing lupus nephritis (LN), including the 2024 KDIGO guidelines and the 2019 EULAR/ERA-EDTA update, recommend a minimum immunosuppression (IS) duration of 36 months. These guidelines suggest that patients with a sustained complete renal response (CRR) may consider gradually tapering off the therapy after 3 to 5 years, although the optimal duration of treatment remains undetermined and should be tailored to individual needs. Despite current clinical practices, a significant rate of renal relapse (RR) persists, ranging from 10% to 50% following the discontinuation of IS therapy. This study aims to investigate the rate and factors associated with RR in patients with LN who have discontinued IS therapy due to a sustained CRR after a minimum of three years of treatment.

Methods: This monocentric, retrospective, observational study identified patients with LN confirmed by renal biopsy, from July 1972 to September 2023. Out of the 272 diagnosed patients, those who had discontinued IS therapy due to a sustained CRR after at least 36 months of treatment were selected for the analysis.

Results: A total of 106 patients (91 women) were included in the study, with a mean age of 33.6 ± 12 years at the time of LN diagnosis. Their main characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The median follow-up duration was 18.25 years from LN diagnosis and 9.6 years from IS discontinuation. Regarding LN classification at diagnosis, 9.4% were class II, 15.1% class III, 55.6% class IV, and 19.8% class V. The median duration of IS therapy before discontinuation was 85 months.

Among these patients, 38 (35.8%) experienced a RR after a median of 26 months following IS discontinuation. Of these, 30 patients (79%) underwent a renal biopsy during the relapse, with 70% retaining the same renal class as their initial diagnosis. Following the relapse, 26 patients (68.4%) achieved a CRR, 8 patients (21%) attained a partial response, and 3 patients (7.9%) progressed to end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

Factors Influencing Renal Relapse (RR): As shown in Table 2 and Figure 1, the following factors are associated with a reduced risk of relapse: 1) extending total  IS therapy beyond 48 months, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.31 (95% CI: 0.15 – 0.64); 2) maintaining a complete renal response (CRR) for more than 48 months before discontinuing treatment (HR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.16-0.73); 3) meeting clinical remission criteria as defined by the DORIS 2021 guidelines at the time of IS discontinuation (HR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.11 – 0.58); and 4) gradually discontinuing IS therapy (HR: 0.25 compared to abrupt discontinuation; 95% CI: 0.12 – 0.53).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that discontinuation of therapy should be carefully considered and limited to specific cases. Patients eligible for discontinuation should have received IS therapy for at least four years and maintained a CRR for over four years. Furthermore, these patients must show quiescence of extrarenal SLE manifestations in accordance with DORIS criteria at the time of IS discontinuation. Additionally, the tapering off of IS should be gradual to optimize outcomes.

Supporting image 1

Table 1. Main characteristics of the sample

Supporting image 2

Table 2. Factors associated with renal relapse

Supporting image 3

Figure 1. Factors associated with renal relapse


Disclosures: P. Vidal: None; J. Narvaez-García: None; F. Fulladosa: None; F. Mitjavila: None; o. Capdevila: None; P. Maymó: None; J. Palacios: None; J. Nolla: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Vidal P, Narvaez-García J, Fulladosa F, Mitjavila F, Capdevila o, Maymó P, Palacios J, Nolla J. Can Immunosuppressive Therapy Be Safely Discontinued in Patients with Lupus Nephritis? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/can-immunosuppressive-therapy-be-safely-discontinued-in-patients-with-lupus-nephritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/can-immunosuppressive-therapy-be-safely-discontinued-in-patients-with-lupus-nephritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology