ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0477

Can Beta-blockers Prevent Aortic Dilation in Patients with Giant Cell Arteritis and Large Vessel Vasculitis?

Hubert De Boysson1, Anael DUMONT2, Samuel DESHAYES2, Alexandre Nguyen2 and Achille Aouba1, 1Department of Internal Medicine, UR4650 PSIR, Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CHU de Caen Normandie, Caen, France, 2Caen University Hospital, Caen, France

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Cardiovascular, giant cell arteritis, prevention

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 12, 2022

Title: Vasculitis – Non-ANCA-Associated and Related Disorders Poster I: Giant Cell Arteritis

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: We analyzed whether the use of beta-blockers in addition to conventional care in patients with Giant cell arteritis (GCA) and large vessel vasculitis (LVV) can help reduce the risk of aortic dilatation.

Methods: We conducted a monocentric retrospective study including 65 consecutive patients with GCA-related LVV who all underwent a control of aorta morphology during follow-up. We created a vascular score ranging from 0, i.e. no cardiovascular (CV) risk factor or event, to 1, i.e. multiple CV risk factors and events, to quantify the impact of CV risk factors and/or previous CV events on the prescription of beta-blockers, as well as on the risk of aortic dilation development.

Results: The characteristics at diagnosis of the 65 GCA patients with LVV are indicated in Table 1. At the time of GCA diagnosis, 15 (23%) patients took beta-blockers which they continued thereafter. The vascular score was significantly higher in patients who received beta-blockers (0.25 [0.125–0.625] in patients with beta-blockers vs. 0.125 [0–0.625] in patients without, p< 0.0001; Table 1). No difference regarding GCA characteristics and treatment was observed when comparing patients with and without beta-blockers (Table 1).

The median follow-up was 91 [25–163] months in GCA patients with beta-blockers, and 61 [14–248] months in GCA patients without beta-blockers (p=0.13). The last control imaging of the aorta was performed in all patients 26 [6–144] months after the first imaging.

A new aortic dilation, not observed on the first imaging, was detected in 15 (23%) patients and none of them were receiving beta-blockers. Survival without new aortic dilation in patients with and without beta-blockers is shown in Figure 1 (log-rank: p=0.009). These 15 patients did not exhibit a higher vascular score than patients without aortic dilation (0.125 [0–0.375] in patients who developed an aortic dilation vs. 0.125 [0–0.625] in those without aortic dilation, p=0.38). Aortic dilation was detected 38 [6–120] months after the first imaging and developed on an aortic segment which was inflamed on the first imaging, of the thoracic section in 14 and of the abdominal section in 1.

The death rate was not different in patients with and without beta-blockers, as well as in patients with and without aortic dilation.

Conclusion: This study is the first to suggest that beta-blockers in addition to conventional care in patients with GCA and LVV may help reduce the risk of aortic dilatation during follow-up, as in non-inflammatory aortic diseases.

Supporting image 1

Table 1. Characteristics at baseline and during the follow-up of GCA patients with large vessel vasculitis, with and without beta-blockers

Supporting image 2

Figure 1. Survival without aortic dilation in patients with GCA-related large vessel vasculitis, with or without beta-blockers.


Disclosures: H. De Boysson, None; A. DUMONT, None; S. DESHAYES, None; A. Nguyen, SANOFI GENZYME; A. Aouba, Roche.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

De Boysson H, DUMONT A, DESHAYES S, Nguyen A, Aouba A. Can Beta-blockers Prevent Aortic Dilation in Patients with Giant Cell Arteritis and Large Vessel Vasculitis? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/can-beta-blockers-prevent-aortic-dilation-in-patients-with-giant-cell-arteritis-and-large-vessel-vasculitis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/can-beta-blockers-prevent-aortic-dilation-in-patients-with-giant-cell-arteritis-and-large-vessel-vasculitis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology