ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1894

Calcium Channel Blockers Are More Effective in the Treatment of Primary Raynaud’s Phenomenon Compared to Secondary: A Meta-Analyis

Janet E. Pope1, Fadumo Rirash2, Paul Tingey3, Sarah Harding4, Lara J. Maxwell5, Peter Tugwell6, Jordi Pardo7, Elizabeth Ghogomu8 and George A. Wells9, 1University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada, 2Medicine/Rheumatology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada, 3Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, 4ERLanger, ERLanger, KY, 5Centre for Global Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 6Center For Global Health, Institute of Population Hlth, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 7University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 8University of Ottawa, Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 9Cardiovascular Research Reference Centre, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Connective tissue diseases, meta-analysis and systemic sclerosis, Raynaud's phenomenon

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Systemic Sclerosis, Fibrosing Syndromes and Raynaud's - Clinical Aspects and Therapeutics Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: To assess the benefits and harms of calcium
channel blockers (CCBs) versus placebo for the treatment of Raynaud’s
phenomenon (RP) comparing primary to secondary RP associated with connective
tissue disease (CTD), especially systemic sclerosis (SSc).

Methods: The Cochrane library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and
Clinicaltrials.gov were searched up to June 2014 for randomized controlled
trials (RCTs) examining RP. Outcomes of interest were: Frequency, Duration and Severity
of RP attacks, Pain, Patient global, Withdrawals and Serious adverse events.
Fixed effects models were used to calculate mean differences (MD) or
standardized mean differences (SMD) for continuous outcomes and risk ratios for
dichotomous outcomes. Heterogeneity was determined and significant if I2>50%. Subgroup
analyses by:  disease type (primary
or secondary), CCB dosage (low, medium or high) and CCB drug were performed.

Results: Of the 2337 articles, 939 participants from 36 RCTs
investigating the effect of CCBs vs. placebo were included. The majority were
crossover RCTs with low to moderate quality using low dose CCBs. CCBs were more
effective in reducing the frequency of attacks (22 RCTs, N=978, MD -2.62, 95%CI
-3.38,-1.88, p<0.00001, Figure) and the severity of attacks (17 trials, N=792,
MD -0.73 95%CI -0.99, -0.47, p<0.00001).No significant differences in
duration, pain or withdrawals between CCBs and placebo occurred. Patient global
was only reported in one study. CCBs reduced the frequency and severity of
attacks irrespective of dosage, particularly for primary RP. CCBs reduced
frequency of attacks/week in primary RP by 3.9 vs. 0.5 in secondary RP. Similar
results were seen in severity of attacks for low dose vs. medium dose CCBs and
primary vs. secondary RP. Low dose CCBs reduced the frequency of attacks by 3.3
per week vs. medium dose at 5.6. Crossover studies may have had carryover
effects.

Conclusion:
Primary RP is more responsive to CCBs than secondary from CTD especially SSc.

:::Screen shot 2015-06-21 at 5.07.24 PM.png


Disclosure: J. E. Pope, None; F. Rirash, None; P. Tingey, None; S. Harding, None; L. J. Maxwell, None; P. Tugwell, None; J. Pardo, None; E. Ghogomu, None; G. A. Wells, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Pope JE, Rirash F, Tingey P, Harding S, Maxwell LJ, Tugwell P, Pardo J, Ghogomu E, Wells GA. Calcium Channel Blockers Are More Effective in the Treatment of Primary Raynaud’s Phenomenon Compared to Secondary: A Meta-Analyis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/calcium-channel-blockers-are-more-effective-in-the-treatment-of-primary-raynauds-phenomenon-compared-to-secondary-a-meta-analyis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/calcium-channel-blockers-are-more-effective-in-the-treatment-of-primary-raynauds-phenomenon-compared-to-secondary-a-meta-analyis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology