ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 11

Biomarker Changes for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Tofacitinib with Methotrexate or Glucocorticoids vs Tofacitinib Monotherapy

Julie Lee1, Xing Chen 1, Weidong Zhang 1, David Martin 1, Craig Hyde 1, Tomohiro Hirose 2, Shweta Shah 3 and Lori Fitz 1, 1Pfizer Inc, Cambridge, MA, 2Pfizer Japan Inc, Toyko, Japan, 3Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: biomarkers and interferons, Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Tofacitinib

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: Cytokines & Cell Trafficking Poster

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Tofacitinib is an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of RA. Herpes zoster (HZ) is more common in patients (pts) with RA vs the general population.1 HZ risk is increased with tofacitinib use,2 and seems to further increase with concomitant use of conventional synthetic DMARDs (eg MTX) or glucocorticoids (GC).3 This increased risk may be linked to treatment-induced IFN suppression,3 as varicella-zoster virus replication may be limited by IFN activity.4 We evaluated whether tofacitinib + MTX and/or GC suppressed IFN pathway proteins to a greater extent than tofacitinib alone.

Methods: This post hoc analysis pooled data from 1 Phase (P) 2 (Japan study [NCT00687193]) and 2 P3 (ORAL Scan [NCT00847613]; ORAL Start [NCT01039688]) tofacitinib studies. Serum samples were collected at baseline (BL), Week (W) 12, and/or W24 from pts with RA treated with tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily alone (Japan study; ORAL Start) or with stable MTX (15–25 mg/week for ≥ 6 weeks; ORAL Scan), and/or GC (≤ 10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent; all studies). A total of 376 proteins associated with cellular/inflammatory processes, including 6 IFN pathway proteins (CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, IL-12, IFNγ, and IL-20), were measured using a homogeneous, solution-based assay (Olink Proseek® Multiplex Assay, Uppsala, Sweden). Protein-level changes at W12 (Japan study; ORAL Scan) and/or W24 (ORAL Scan; ORAL Start) were compared for both regimens using linear regression models. The dependent variable was change from BL in protein levels at W12 or W24. The independent variable was MTX or GC status. Age, gender, GC status (in MTX model), BL protein levels, and tofacitinib dose were covariates. Separate regressions were performed for each study; GC results were combined via meta-analysis using fixed-/random-effect models. Significance was considered at p < 0.1 after controlling for false discovery rate (FDR).

Results: In total, 659 samples were obtained from 321 pts. Of the 6 IFN pathway proteins, IFNγ and IL-20 were below the limit of detection. There were no statistical differences between tofacitinib alone vs tofacitinib + MTX and/or GC in changes in levels of the 4 detectable IFN pathway proteins (CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, and IL-12) at W12/W24. Significant differences were observed for 2 of 370 other proteins: MMP-1 (FDR-adjusted p = 0.08) and IL1 decoy receptor (IL1Ra; FDR-adjusted p = 0.09); levels were decreased at W12 for tofacitinib + MTX to a greater extent vs tofacitinib alone (Figure 1).

Conclusion: Tofacitinib + MTX and/or GC may not suppress IFN pathway proteins to a greater extent than tofacitinib alone. There were differences at W12 for tofacitinib + MTX vs tofacitinib alone in MMP-1 and IL1Ra, but it is not clear whether these were due to ethnicity differences in the study populations receiving these treatments (global vs Japan). Analyses of biomarker changes with tofacitinib are ongoing.

  1. McDonald JR et al. Clin Infect Dis 2009;48:1364-71.
  2. Winthrop KL et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2014;66:2675-84.
  3. Winthrop KL et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 2017;69:1960-8.
  4. Ku CC et al. Cell Biosci 2016;6:21.


Acknowledgments:
Study sponsored by Pfizer Inc. Medical writing support was provided by Sarah Piggott of CMC Connect and funded by Pfizer Inc.


Disclosure: J. Lee, Pfizer Inc, 1, 3; X. Chen, Pfizer Inc, 1, 3; W. Zhang, Pfizer Inc, 1, 3; D. Martin, Pfizer Inc, 1, 3; C. Hyde, Pfizer Inc, 1, 3; T. Hirose, Pfizer, 3, 4, Pfizer Inc, 1, 3; S. Shah, Pfizer Inc, 1, 3; L. Fitz, Pfizer Inc, 1, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Lee J, Chen X, Zhang W, Martin D, Hyde C, Hirose T, Shah S, Fitz L. Biomarker Changes for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Tofacitinib with Methotrexate or Glucocorticoids vs Tofacitinib Monotherapy [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/biomarker-changes-for-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-receiving-tofacitinib-with-methotrexate-or-glucocorticoids-vs-tofacitinib-monotherapy/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/biomarker-changes-for-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-receiving-tofacitinib-with-methotrexate-or-glucocorticoids-vs-tofacitinib-monotherapy/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology