ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2345

Biological Sex-Related Differences in Radiographic Progression and Relationship with Early Clinical Response: Post Hoc Analysis of a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo‑Controlled Study in Biologic-Naive Participants with Active Psoriatic Arthritis Treated with Guselkumab

Dafna D. Gladman1, Lihi Eder2, Carlo Selmi3, Philip J. Mease4, Alexis Ogdie5, Karissa Lozenski6, Mohamed Sharaf7, Emmanouil Rampakakis8, Laura Pina Vegas9 and Laura Coates10, 1Schroeder Arthritis Institute, Krembil Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, Division of Rheumatology, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3Humanitas University, Milan, Italy, 4Department of Rheumatology, Providence-Swedish Medical Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 5University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 6Johnson & Johnson, Horsham, PA, 7Janssen - Johnson & Johnson, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 8JSS Medical Research, Montréal, QC, Canada, 9Epidemiology in Dermatology and Evaluation of Therapeutics (EpiDermE), University Paris-Est Créteil Val de Marne, Créteil, France; Rheumatology, Hospital Henri Mondor, AP-HP, Créteil, France, Creteil, France, 10Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Biologicals, clinical trial, Dermatology, Inflammation, Interleukins

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Title: (2338–2376) Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Previous research has shown that women with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) often have lower rates of clinical response to medication but less severe radiographic joint damage. Despite this, few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PsA report sex-disaggregated results. Here, we assessed sex-disaggregated radiographic progression (RP) in DISCOVER-2 (NCT03158285), a Phase 3 study of biologic-naïve PsA pts treated with GUS, considering sex differences in structural damage and whether this is associated with early improvements in joint disease activity (DA).

Methods: Biologic-naïve pts with active PsA were randomized (1:1:1) to GUS 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W); GUS 100 mg at W0, W4, then Q8W; or placebo with crossover to GUS 100 mg Q4W at W24. Early (W8) response in joint DA, (based on clinical DA Index for PsA [cDAPSA LDA; ≤13]), was assessed among pts with cDAPSA >13 at BL, without adjustment for sex-specific differences at BL. Multivariate repeated measures mixed models assessed associations between sex and changes in total PsA-modified van der Heijde-Sharp [vdH-S] score through W100 (Fig 1), association between early response in joint DA and RP when stratified by sex (Fig 2); time-averaged and visit-specific LSM changes.

Results: Of 739 PsA pts enrolled, 47.5% were female. At BL, female vs male pts were more likely to be older (29.3% vs 21.9% ≥55 years of age; p=0.0204) and have dactylitis (60.6% vs 50.3%; p=0.0049), and on average had higher BMI (29.5 vs 28.4 kg/m2; p=0.0144), lower CRP levels (1.6 vs 2.3; p< 0.0001), less extensive/severe psoriasis (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] score: 7.5 vs 12.1; p< 0.0001), more functional disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index [HAQ-DI] score: 1.4 vs 1.2; p< 0.0001), and worse fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy [FACIT]-Fatigue score: 28.5 vs 30.9; p=0.0007). BL cDAPSA (46.1 vs 46.4) and PsA-modified vdH-S (26.2 vs 25.5) scores were similar (p >0.05) between sexes.In unadjusted analyses of GUS-treated pts, male sex was associated with greater progression of structural damage through W100 (ΔLSM=1.02; p=0.0260). After adjusting for known risk factors of RP, BL characteristics with sex-specific differences in the pooled cohort, and disease duration and non-biologic DMARD use at BL, the difference between sexes in RP decreased but remained significant (ΔLSM=0.90; p=0.0406); LSM changes from BL in PsA-modified vdH-S scores in males vs females were 1.36 vs 0.69 (p=0.0502) at W52 and 2.22 vs 1.10 (p=0.0475) at W100 (Fig 1). Early (W8) cDAPSA LDA was achieved by 18.9% of men vs 15.3% of women. In men, this was associated with significantly less RP through W100 (time-averaged change in PsA-modifed vdH-S scores from BL to W100 in cDAPSA LDA responders vs nonresponders: 0.39 vs 2.24; p=0.0288); in females only, numerical differences were observed (-0.15 vs 0.91; p=0.1732; Fig 2).

Conclusion: These results confirm the independent association of male sex with more rapid RP. The previously reported relationship between early improvement in joint DA and diminished RP (Mease PJ, et al. Clin Rheumatol 2024) was found to be stronger in males than females, which may be due to the lower rate of RP in females.

Supporting image 1Figure 1. Change in Total PsA-modified vdH-S Score from BL Through W100 in Male and Female PsA Pts Treated with GUS

Supporting image 2Figure 2. Multivariate Association of cDAPSA LDA Achievement at W8 with Time-Averaged Change in Total PsA-modified vdH-S Score from BL Through W100 in Male and Female PsA Pts Treated with GUS


Disclosures: D. Gladman: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, BMS, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Janssen, 5, Johnson & Johnson, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Roche, 2, UCB, 2, 5; L. Eder: AbbVie, 1, 2, 5, 6, BMS, 1, 2, Eli Lilly, 1, 2, 5, 6, Fresenius Kabi, 1, 5, J&J, 1, 2, 5, Janssen, 1, 5, Novartis, 1, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 1, 2, 5, UCB, 1, 2, 5; C. Selmi: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Alfa-Wassermann, 2, 6, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Biogen, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, EUSA, 2, 6, Galapagos, 2, 6, Janssen, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, Pfizer, 5, SOBI, 2, 6; P. Mease: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Acelyrin, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, BMS, 2, 5, Century, 2, Cullinan, 2, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, 6, Inmagene, 2, J&J Innovative Medicine, 2, 5, 6, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Sana, 5, Spyre, 5, Takeda, 2, UCB, 2, 5, 6; A. Ogdie: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, 11, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Celgene, 2, 5, CorEvitas, LLC, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Forward Databank, 5, Gilead, 1, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, Kopa/Twill Health, 2, NIH/NIAMS, National Psoriasis Foundation, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, 11, Pfizer, 2, 5, 11, Rheumatology Research Foundation, 5, Spyre, 2, Takeda, 2, UCB, 2, 5, University of Pennsylvania, 5; K. Lozenski: BMS, 11, Johnson & Johnson, 3, 11; M. Sharaf: Johnson & Johnson, 3, 11; E. Rampakakis: Johnson & Johnson, 2, JSS Medical Research, 3; L. Vegas: Novartis, 12, Support for attending meeting; L. Coates: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Biogen, 6, BMS, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Celgene, 2, 5, 6, Domain, 2, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, 6, Galapagos, 2, 6, Gilead, 2, 5, 6, GSK, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Medac, 6, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gladman D, Eder L, Selmi C, Mease P, Ogdie A, Lozenski K, Sharaf M, Rampakakis E, Vegas L, Coates L. Biological Sex-Related Differences in Radiographic Progression and Relationship with Early Clinical Response: Post Hoc Analysis of a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo‑Controlled Study in Biologic-Naive Participants with Active Psoriatic Arthritis Treated with Guselkumab [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/biological-sex-related-differences-in-radiographic-progression-and-relationship-with-early-clinical-response-post-hoc-analysis-of-a-phase-3-randomized-double-blind-placebo%e2%80%91controlled-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/biological-sex-related-differences-in-radiographic-progression-and-relationship-with-early-clinical-response-post-hoc-analysis-of-a-phase-3-randomized-double-blind-placebo%e2%80%91controlled-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology