ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0527

Bimekizumab Treatment Impact on Pain and Fatigue in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis Who Were Biologic DMARD‑Naïve or Had Inadequate Response or Intolerance to TNF-α Inhibitors: 1-Year Results from Two Phase 3 Studies

M. Elaine Husni1, Philip J. Mease2, Joseph Merola3, Frank Behrens4, Ennio G Favalli5, Dennis McGonagle6, William R Tillett7, Shigeyoshi Tsuji8, Barbara Ink9, Rajan Bajracharya9, Jérémy Lambert10, Jason Coarse11 and Laure Gossec12, 1Cleveland Clinic / Department of Rheumatic and Immunologic Diseases, Cleveland, OH, 2Swedish Medical Center/Providence St. Joseph Health and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, 3Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Newton, MA, 4Goethe University, Division of Rheumatology, University Hospital and Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine & Pharmacology, Frankfurt, Germany, 5ASST Gaetano Pini-CTO, University of Milan, Department of Rheumatology, Milan, Italy, 6Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 7Department of Rheumatology, Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Bath, United Kingdom, 8Nippon Life Hospital, Osaka, Japan, 9UCB Pharma, Slough, United Kingdom, 10UCB Pharma, Irigny, France, 11UCB Pharma, Morrisville, NC, 12Sorbonne Université and Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Fatigue, pain, Patient reported outcomes, Psoriatic arthritis, spondyloarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 12, 2023

Title: (0510–0542) Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment: AxSpA Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Pain and fatigue have been identified by patients (pts) as key features of PsA, driving the impact on their health-related quality of life.1 Bimekizumab (BKZ), a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits IL-17F in addition to IL-17A, has demonstrated meaningful improvements in pain and fatigue outcomes to 16 weeks (wks) vs placebo (PBO) in pts with active PsA.2,3 In this study, pt-reported pain and fatigue outcomes are reported up to 1 year from two phase 3 studies of BKZ in pts with PsA.

Methods: BE OPTIMAL (NCT03895203) and BE COMPLETE (NCT03896581) were two phase 3 trials assessing BKZ in pts with active PsA who were biologic DMARD (bDMARD)-naïve or had inadequate response or intolerance to 1–2 TNF-α inhibitors (TNFi-IR), respectively. Both trials had a 16-wk double-blind, PBO-controlled phase.

Pts in BE OPTIMAL were randomized 3:2:1 to subcutaneous (sc) BKZ 160 mg every 4 wks (Q4W), PBO, or reference (sc adalimumab [ADA] 40 mg Q2W). At Wk 16, PBO pts switched to receive BKZ until Wk 52 (PBO/BKZ); pts receiving BKZ or ADA continued their dosing until Wk 52. BE OPTIMAL ADA data are not reported here. Pts in BE COMPLETE were randomized 2:1 to sc BKZ 160 mg Q4W or PBO. Along with BE OPTIMAL Wk 52 completers, pts who completed Wk 16 of BE COMPLETE were eligible to enter an open-label extension, BE VITAL (NCT04009499); PBO pts switched to BKZ (PBO/BKZ) on entry (36 wks of BKZ treatment to Wk 52); BE COMPLETE plus BE VITAL is referred to as ‘BE COMPLETE’ hereafter.

Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) subscale Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID; ≥4-point improvement from baseline [BL]) and change from BL (CfB), along with Pt’s Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP) CfB and clinically important improvements (≥30/50/70%), are reported up to 1 year. BE COMPLETE FACIT‑Fatigue values were collected to Wk 40 only. Non-responder and multiple imputation (NRI, MI) were used for missing binary and continuous variables.

Results: Overall, 770/852 (90.4%) and 347/400 (86.8%) pts completed Wk 52 of BE OPTIMAL and BE COMPLETE, respectively.

At Wk 16, BKZ-treated pts achieved greater improvements in pain and fatigue outcomes vs PBO pts (Figure); improvements were sustained from Wk 16 to Wk 52 on BKZ treatment. For PBO/BKZ pts, pain and fatigue outcomes improved following switch to BKZ (Table).

Of pts with FACIT-Fatigue ≤48 at BL, FACIT-Fatigue MCID was achieved by 208/383 (54.3%) BKZ and 139/259 (53.7%) PBO/BKZ pts at Wk 52 in BE OPTIMAL, and 146/250 (58.4%) BKZ and 54/121 (44.6%) PBO/BKZ pts at Wk 40 in BE COMPLETE (Table, Figure). At Wk 52, PtAAP 50 was achieved by 243/431 (56.4%) BKZ and 158/281 (56.2%) PBO/BKZ pts in BE OPTIMAL, and 152/267 (56.9%) BKZ and 56/133 (42.1%) PBO/BKZ pts in BE COMPLETE.

Conclusion: Treatment with BKZ resulted in sustained improvements in pt‑reported pain and fatigue from Wk 16 up to 1 year in both bDMARD-naïve and TNFi-IR pts with active PsA, with clinically meaningful improvements observed in over half of pts. Improvements in pt‑reported pain and fatigue were similar between the two studies, demonstrating consistent responses in bDMARD-naïve and TNFi-IR pts.

References:1. Ogdie A. RMD Open 2020;6:e001321;2. McInnes IB. Lancet 2023;401:25–37; 3. Merola JF. Lancet 2023;401:38–48.

Supporting image 1

Table. Patient-reported symptoms at Week 40/52

Supporting image 2

Figure. (A) FACIT-Fatigue MCID and (B) PtAAP 50 responders up to Week 40/52 [NRI]


Disclosures: M. Husni: AbbVie, 1, 2, Amgen, 1, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1, 2, Eli Lilly, 1, 2, Janssen, 1, 2, Novartis, 1, 2, Pfizer, 1, 2, UCB, 1, 2; P. Mease: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Acelyrin, 2, Aclaris, 2, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, Galapagos, 2, Gilead, 2, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, Inmagene, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, MoonLake Pharma, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Sun Pharma, 2, 5, UCB Pharma, 2, 5, 6, Ventyx, 2, Xinthera, 2; J. Merola: Abbvie, 2, 12, Investigator, Amgen, 2, 12, Investigator, Biogen, 2, 12, Investigator, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 12, Investigator, Dermavant, 2, 12, Investigator, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, 12, Investigator, Janssen, 2, 12, Investigator, Leo Pharma, 2, 12, Investigator, Novartis, 2, 12, Investigator, Pfizer, 2, 12, Investigator, Regeneron, 2, 12, Investigator, Sanofi, 2, 12, Investigator, Sun Pharma, 2, 12, Investigator, UCB Pharma, 2, 12, Investigator; F. Behrens: AbbVie, 2, 6, Affibody, 2, Amgen, 6, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, Celgene, 5, Chugai, 5, Eli Lilly, 6, Genzyme, 6, Gilead Sciences, 2, GSK, 2, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, MoonLake, 2, 6, MSD, 2, 6, Novartis, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Roche, 5, Sandoz, 2, 6, Sanofi, 2, 6; E. Favalli: AbbVie, 2, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), 2, 6, Celltrion, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Galapagos, 2, 6, Janssen, 2, 6, MSD, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, UCB Pharma, 2, 6; D. McGonagle: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Celgene, 2, 5, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Merck, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6; W. Tillett: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Celgene, 2, 5, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, GSK, 2, 5, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, MSD, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Ovo Pharma, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, UCB Pharma, 2, 5, 6; S. Tsuji: AbbVie, 2, 6, Eisai, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Janssen, 2, 6, Kyowa Kirin, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, UCB Pharma, 2, 6; B. Ink: AbbVie, 11, GSK, 11, UCB Pharma, 3, 11; R. Bajracharya: UCB Pharma, 3, 11; J. Lambert: UCB Pharma, 3, 11; J. Coarse: UCB Pharma, 3, 11; L. Gossec: AbbVie, 2, 12, Personal fees, Amgen, 2, Biogen, 5, BMS, 12, Personal fees, Celltrion, 12, Personal fees, Eli Lilly, 5, 12, Personal fees, Galapagos, 12, Personal fees, Janssen, 12, Personal fees, MSD, 12, Personal fees, Novartis, 5, 12, Personal fees, Pfizer, 12, Personal fees, Sandoz, 5, 12, Personal fees, UCB Pharma, 5, 12, Personal fees.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Husni M, Mease P, Merola J, Behrens F, Favalli E, McGonagle D, Tillett W, Tsuji S, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Lambert J, Coarse J, Gossec L. Bimekizumab Treatment Impact on Pain and Fatigue in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis Who Were Biologic DMARD‑Naïve or Had Inadequate Response or Intolerance to TNF-α Inhibitors: 1-Year Results from Two Phase 3 Studies [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/bimekizumab-treatment-impact-on-pain-and-fatigue-in-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis-who-were-biologic-dmard%e2%80%91naive-or-had-inadequate-response-or-intolerance-to-tnf-%ce%b1-inhibitors-1/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/bimekizumab-treatment-impact-on-pain-and-fatigue-in-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis-who-were-biologic-dmard%e2%80%91naive-or-had-inadequate-response-or-intolerance-to-tnf-%ce%b1-inhibitors-1/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology