ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 542

‘BENEFIT’ Pan-European Observational Study to Evaluate the Real-world Effectiveness of SB4 Transition from Originator Etanercept (ETN) in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis or Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Switch Success Story

Carlo Selmi 1, Klaus Krüger2, Alain Cantagrel 3, Abad Hernández 4, Ulrich Freudensprung 5, Mourad Farouk Rezk 5 and Janet Addison 6, 1Humanitas Research Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy, 2Medical Centre of Rheumatology, Munich, Germany, 3Center of Rheumatology of CHU, Toulouse, France, 4FEA Reumatología, Hospital Virgen del Puerto, Cáceres, Spain, 5Biogen International GmbH, Zug, Switzerland, 6Biogen UK, Maidenhead, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: biosimilars, etanercept, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and axial spondyloarthritis, Transition

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: RA – Treatments Poster I: Novel Treatments

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: SB4, a biosimilar to the reference ETN, received EU marketing authorisation in January 2016, based on the totality of evidence from pre-clinical and clinical Phase I and III studies that demonstrated similar efficacy, bioequivalence, and comparable safety and immunogenicity to ETN. The BENEFIT study describes real world evidence on outcomes of transition from originator to biosimilar in both rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in 4 EU countries, outside the controlled setting of a randomised clinical trial, with the purpose of providing real world evidence on transition and outcomes of treatment switch in routine clinical practice.

Methods: Eligible patients had RA or axSpA and had initiated SB4 following treatment with a stable dose of originator ETN in a 6-month window. Data were captured from clinic records, retrospectively for 6 months prior and prospectively and/or retrospectively for 6 months after switch. Outcomes include disease score (DAS-28 for RA, BASDAI for axSpA) over time, clinical characteristics and management, and serious adverse events (SAEs).

Results: Of the 557 patients included, 358 had RA and 199 axSpA; data at baseline and after transition are illustrated in Table 1.

One adverse event of pneumonia was reported as Serious (SAE) and related to SB4. Six SAEs unrelated to SB4 were reported: Uveitis, umbilical hernia, relapsing pancreatitis, coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lithium overdose.

Conclusion: These data from clinical practice indicate maintenance of disease status post-switch from ETN to SB4, without the need for dose adjustment, and with high persistence at 6 months after switch, in both RA and axSpA patients. No safety concerns were observed. The study data provide pertinent information about 6-month outcomes in these populations, helping to inform evidence-based treatment decisions.

Acknowledgements:
Biogen International GmbH funded and sponsored this study. Authors had full editorial control and provided final approval of all content.


Table 1 -to be placed following first paragraph of Results section-


Disclosure: C. Selmi, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, 9, Alfa-Sigma, 5, 8, 9, Biogen, 5, 8, 9, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, 8, 9, Celgene, 5, 8, 9, Eli-Lilly, 5, 8, 9, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, 8, 9, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, 9, Merck Sharp and Dohme, 2, 5, 8, MSD, 2, 5, 8, 9, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, 9, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, 9, Roche, 5, 8, 9, Sanofi-Genzyme, 5, 8, 9, UCB, 5, 8, 9; K. Krüger, AbbVie, 5, 8, Biogen, 5, 8, BMS, 5, 8, Celgen, 8, Celgene, 5, 8, Hexal, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, Lilly, 5, 8, MSD, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Roche, 5, 8, Sanofi, 5, 8, Sanofi-Aventis, 5, UCB, 5, 8; A. Cantagrel, Lilly France, 5, 8, Médac, 5, MSD France, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Roche, 5, 8, Sandoz, 5, Sanofi Aventis, 5, Biogen, 8, Celgene, 8, Nordic-Pharma, 8, Sanofi, 8, AbbVie, 2, 8, Chugai, 2, 5, 8, MSD, 2, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8, BMS, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8; A. Hernández, None; U. Freudensprung, Biogen, 3, 4; M. Rezk, Biogen, 3, 4; J. Addison, Biogen, 3, 4.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Selmi C, Krüger K, Cantagrel A, Hernández A, Freudensprung U, Rezk M, Addison J. ‘BENEFIT’ Pan-European Observational Study to Evaluate the Real-world Effectiveness of SB4 Transition from Originator Etanercept (ETN) in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis or Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Switch Success Story [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/benefit-pan-european-observational-study-to-evaluate-the-real-world-effectiveness-of-sb4-transition-from-originator-etanercept-etn-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-or-axial-sp/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/benefit-pan-european-observational-study-to-evaluate-the-real-world-effectiveness-of-sb4-transition-from-originator-etanercept-etn-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-or-axial-sp/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology