ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0603

Barriers and Potential Solutions in the Recruitment and Retention of Older Patients in Clinical Trials – Lessons Learned from Six Large Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trials

Thomas Buttgereit1, Andriko Palmowski1, Noah Forsat1, Maarten Boers2, Miles Witham3, Nicolas Rodondi4, Elisavet Moutzouri4, Antonio Jesus Quesada Navidad5, Arnoud van’t Hof6, Bart van der Worp7, Laura Coll-Planas8, Marieke Voshaar9, Maarten de Wit10, Jose Pereira da Silva11, Sven Stegemann12, Johannes Bijlsma13, Marcus Koeller14, Simon Mooijaart15, Patricia Kearney16 and Frank Buttgereit1, 1Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 2Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 3AGE Research Group, NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University and Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals Trust, Newcastle, United Kingdom, 4Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland, 5CNIC – Spanish National Center for Cardiovascular Research, Madrid, 6Cardiology Department, Maastricht UMC, Maastricht, Netherlands, 7Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, 8Fundació Salut i Envelliment, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 9Department Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, Twente, Netherlands, 10EULAR Patient Research Partner, Zaltbommel, Netherlands, 11University of Coimbra | UC · Clínica Universitária de Reumatologia. Faculty of Medicine, Columbia, Portugal, 12TU Graz, Institute for Process and Particle Engineering, Graz, Australia, 13Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, 14Faculty of Geriatric Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 15Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Institute for Evidence-based Medicine in Old Age | IEMO, Leiden, Netherlands, 16School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Aging, clinical trial

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 7, 2021

Title: Healthcare Disparities in Rheumatology Poster (0594–0622)

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Older people remain underrepresented in clinical trials, and evidence generated in younger populations cannot always be generalized to older patients.

We aimed to identify key barriers and to discuss solutions to specific issues affecting recruitment and retention of older participants in clinical trials based on experience gained from six current European randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on older People (Table 1).

Methods: A multidisciplinary group of experts including representatives of the six RCTs held two networking conferences and compiled lists of potential barriers and solutions. Every item was subsequently allocated points by each study team according to how important it was perceived to be for their RCTs.

Results: The six RCTs enrolled 7612 older patients (Table 1). Key barriers to recruitment were impaired health status, comorbidities and diverse health beliefs including priorities within different cultural Systems (Figure 1A). All trials had to increase the number of recruitment sites. Other measures felt to be effective included the provision of extra time, communication training for the study staff and a re-design of patient Information (Figure 1B). Key barriers for retention included the presence of severe comorbidities and the occurrence of adverse events. Long study duration, frequent study visits and difficulties accessing the study site were also mentioned (Figure 2A). Solutions felt to be effective included spending more time maintaining close contact with the participants, appropriate measures to show appreciation and reimbursement of travel Arrangements (Figure 2B).

Conclusion: Recruitment and retention of older patients in trials requires special recognition and a targeted approach. Our results provide scientifically-based practical recommendations for optimizing future studies in this population.

Six international multi-center randomized controlled trials (RCTs), designed for patients aged ≥ 65 years and supported by the European Commission Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme

A: Challenges in retention. Mean number of points awarded per item (standard error range: 1,92 – 4,84). The more points an item got, the more relevant it was perceived to be for the respective trial.
B: Solutions in retention. Mean number of points awarded per item (standard error range: 0,21 – 4,47). The more points an item got, the more relevant it was perceived to be for the respective trial.

A: Challenges in retention. Mean number of points awarded per item (standard error range: 1,92 – 4,84). The more points an item got, the more relevant it was perceived to be for the respective trial.
B: Solutions in retention. Mean number of points awarded per item (standard error range: 0,21 – 4,47). The more points an item got, the more relevant it was perceived to be for the respective trial.


Disclosures: T. Buttgereit, None; A. Palmowski, None; N. Forsat, None; M. Boers, BMS, 2, Pfizer, 2, GSK, 2, Novartis, 2; M. Witham, None; N. Rodondi, None; E. Moutzouri, None; A. Quesada Navidad, None; A. van’t Hof, None; B. van der Worp, None; L. Coll-Planas, None; M. Voshaar, None; M. de Wit, None; J. Pereira da Silva, Amgen, 6, Jaba Recordati, 6, Pfizer, 6; S. Stegemann, None; J. Bijlsma, None; M. Koeller, None; S. Mooijaart, None; P. Kearney, None; F. Buttgereit, Horizon Therapeutics, 2, 5, Mundipharma, 5, Roche, 1, 5, Pfizer, 1, 5, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Buttgereit T, Palmowski A, Forsat N, Boers M, Witham M, Rodondi N, Moutzouri E, Quesada Navidad A, van’t Hof A, van der Worp B, Coll-Planas L, Voshaar M, de Wit M, Pereira da Silva J, Stegemann S, Bijlsma J, Koeller M, Mooijaart S, Kearney P, Buttgereit F. Barriers and Potential Solutions in the Recruitment and Retention of Older Patients in Clinical Trials – Lessons Learned from Six Large Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trials [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/barriers-and-potential-solutions-in-the-recruitment-and-retention-of-older-patients-in-clinical-trials-lessons-learned-from-six-large-multi-center-randomized-controlled-trials/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/barriers-and-potential-solutions-in-the-recruitment-and-retention-of-older-patients-in-clinical-trials-lessons-learned-from-six-large-multi-center-randomized-controlled-trials/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology