ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1562

B Cell Reconstitution Is Strongly Associated with COVID-19 Vaccine Responsiveness in Rheumatic Disease Patients Treated with Rituximab

Sarah Jinich, Deanna Jannat-Khah and Robert Spiera, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: B cells, COVID-19, Rituximab, Vaccination

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 9, 2021

Title: Infection-related Rheumatic Disease Poster (1530–1564)

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Rituximab (RTX) has previously been shown to impair antibody response to vaccines such as influenza and streptococcus. Recently, diminished COVID-19 vaccine responsiveness in RTX treated patients has been reported. While COVID-19 vaccination guidelines have adopted time since last RTX infusion as a consideration for likelihood of vaccine responsiveness, a retrospective study suggested that B Cell reconstitution may be a more accurate predictor of vaccine response. Our hypothesis was that B Cell reconstitution would be associated with vaccine responsiveness.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed to assess patients that visited a rheumatology practice from 2/24-5/20, 2021. Analysis included patients who had received treatment with RTX and had completed COVID-19 vaccination. Demographics, diagnoses, concurrent therapies, vaccine type/dates, time from last RTX to first vaccination quantitative serological vaccine response, and % CD19 positive cells in the lymphocyte population were collected. COVID-19 serological response was the primary outcome. Descriptive statistics and bivariate comparisons were performed. Negative and positive predictive value was calculated between COVID-19 serological response and B Cell reconstitution status.

Results: 58 patients were identified who met criteria for inclusion. The majority were female (40, 69%), white (52, 90%), and the mean age was 62.67 years (Table 1).

41 patients (71%) had B Cell status measured at time of antibody immunoassay. Time from last RTX was significantly longer in seropositive (median #days, IQR 594 (248, 1163) patients compared to seronegative patients (median #days, IQR 138 (68, 197) days) (p-value < 0.001). There was a significant difference in B Cell reconstitution between patients who had positive antibody responses to vaccination (median, IQR 2 (0.265-9.5) % of total lymphocyte population) versus negative responses (median, IQR 0 (0-0) % (p< 0.001) (Table 2). Only 12% (3/25) of patients >12 months since last RTX did not demonstrate a serologic responses, whereas 24% of patients (9/37) > 6 months since last RTX and 50% (6/12) of those 6-12 months from last RTX did not have a serologic response to the vaccine (Figure 1, Table 2).

B Cell reconstitution and time from last RTX were both significant indicators of vaccine response. (Figure 1). Seropositivity was 76% among those >6 months from last RTX exposure, however that increases to 92% in those with detectable B Cells (p=0.006). In patients 6-12 months from RTX exposure, only 50% were seropositive, however that increases to 83.33% in those with detectable B Cells (p=0.190) The positive predictive value of B Cell reconstitution for COVID-19 serologic response was 92% (95%CI: 74%-99%) and the negative predictive value was 68.8% (95%CI: 41.3%-89%).

Conclusion: B Cell reconstitution and longer time from last RTX were associated with a positive serologic response to the COVID-19 vaccine. A substantial number of patients >6 months from last RTX did not have a serologic response, and B cell reconstitution increased the likelihood of a response. Strategies for maximizing vaccine responsiveness in RTX treated patients should incorporate B Cell reconstitution and time from last RTX.


Disclosures: S. Jinich, None; D. Jannat-Khah, Cytodyn, 12, own shares of stock, Walgreens, 12, Own stock shares, AstraZeneca, 12, own stock shares, GW Pharmaceuticals, 12, stock ownership; R. Spiera, GSK, 2, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, 5, Chemocentryx, 2, 5, Corbus Pharmaceutical, 5, Formation Biologics, 2, 5, InflaRx, 5, Kadmon, 5, Astra Zeneca, 5, Abbvie, 2, CSL Behring, 2, Sanofi, 2, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, 2, Genentech/Roche, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Jinich S, Jannat-Khah D, Spiera R. B Cell Reconstitution Is Strongly Associated with COVID-19 Vaccine Responsiveness in Rheumatic Disease Patients Treated with Rituximab [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/b-cell-reconstitution-is-strongly-associated-with-covid-19-vaccine-responsiveness-in-rheumatic-disease-patients-treated-with-rituximab/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/b-cell-reconstitution-is-strongly-associated-with-covid-19-vaccine-responsiveness-in-rheumatic-disease-patients-treated-with-rituximab/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology