ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2353

Attitudes and Beliefs Regarding Methotrexate in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results from Australian Rheumatology Association Database

Nieves Leonardo1,2, Susan Lester3,4, Michelle Graham5, Samuel Whittle1,6, Debra Rowett7,8, Rachelle Buchbinder9,10 and Catherine Hill6,11,12, 1Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia, 2Rheumatology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia, 3Rheumatology Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia, 4Discipline of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia, 5Arthritis Queensland, Queensland, Australia, 6The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia, 7School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia, 8Drug and Therapeutics Information Service, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia, 9Cabrini Institute, Victoria, Australia, 10Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, 11Rheumatology Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia, 12Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: methotrexate (MTX), rheumatoid arthritis, treatment and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, and Attitudes Poster II: Patient Perspectives

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

To determine beliefs about methotrexate (MTX) in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) in relation to views obtained from a range of information sources.

Methods:

RA patients, who had completed an online questionnaire on a national RA database within the previous 12 months, n=1010, were invited to participate in an additional online questionnaire (Survey Monkey) regarding their use and views of MTX. Participants who had ever-used MTX were asked about sources consulted for MTX information, and whether positive or negative views were obtained. The Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ), consisting of general medication (overuse and harm) and MTX specific (necessity and concerns) was used to measure patient specific beliefs about MTX. Demographic and clinical information of the survey respondents was obtained by linkage to the national database.

Results:

The survey response rate was 804/1010 (80%). MTX survey data was analysed for 742 RA participants (age 59 years, 76% female, disease duration 19 years, 75% rheumatoid factor positive) who had ever-used MTX, with 494/742 (67%) reporting current use.

Current MTX users scored substantially higher on the BMQ MTX specific Necessity scale, and slightly lower on the MTX-specific Concerns scale (Table 1).

Table 1. Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire results by MTX use

A screenshot of a cell phone Description generated with very high confidence

Participants consulted multiple information sources (median 3, IQR 1-5), which was associated with younger age, higher education levels, higher MTX-specific concerns and general medication BMQ scores (p<0.05, multiple Poisson regression). Rheumatologists (98%), GPs (55%), internet search engines (39%), educational websites (38%), and Pharmacist (37%) were the most common information sources. When consulted, positive MTX information was most often obtained from rheumatologists (93%), GPs (67%), and educational websites (56%) (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Reported MTX Views by Source

A screenshot of a cell phone Description generated with high confidence

Negative MTX information was most often obtained from relatives, social media, internet chat rooms, and friends. Positive information from Rheumatologists (p<0.001) and Educational websites (p= 0.021) was influential on favourable MTX-specific necessity and concerns BMQ scores (MANOVA analysis).

Conclusion:

RA patients have significant concerns regarding MTX and consult a variety of sources for MTX information. However, the patient perception of this information varies widely. Rheumatologists and educational websites are the most important information sources in terms of utilisation, positive information, and influence on the patient’s perception of MTX.


Disclosure: N. Leonardo, None; S. Lester, None; M. Graham, None; S. Whittle, None; D. Rowett, None; R. Buchbinder, None; C. Hill, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Leonardo N, Lester S, Graham M, Whittle S, Rowett D, Buchbinder R, Hill C. Attitudes and Beliefs Regarding Methotrexate in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results from Australian Rheumatology Association Database [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/attitudes-and-beliefs-regarding-methotrexate-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-results-from-australian-rheumatology-association-database/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/attitudes-and-beliefs-regarding-methotrexate-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-results-from-australian-rheumatology-association-database/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology