ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 269

Attitudes and Beliefs About Opioid Medications: Determining Treatment Use in Osteoarthritis

Ernest Vina1, Jazmin Dagnino 1 and C. Kent Kwoh 1, 1University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: opioid, Osteoarthritis, treatment utilization and perceptions

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: Health Services Research Poster I – ACR/ARP

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Considering the growing opioid epidemic in the US, it is imperative to have a good understanding of what patient characteristics predict the use of these types of medication.  Patients’ attitudes and beliefs about treatments may influence perceptions of need and use of health treatments.  Their significance as determinants of utilization of opioid medications for osteoarthritis (OA) treatment is unknown, however.  The objective of this study is to determine if patient familiarity with and perceptions of efficacy and risk of opioid medications are associated with opioid medication use for OA.

Methods: Participants with chronic, frequent pain due to knee or hip OA were recruited from a university medical center.  A self-administered questionnaire was used to determine use of an opioid medication to treat OA in the last 6 months.  The questionnaire also assessed patient familiarity with (3 items, yes/no), and perceptions of efficacy (4 items) and risk (3 items) of opioid medications.  Responses to perceptions of efficacy and risk question items were based on a five-category ordinal response scale (score 1-5).  Items were averaged, with higher values indicating higher perception of efficacy/risk.  Chi-squared or t-tests were conducted to determine if the familiarity and perception of efficacy/risk items were associated with opioid treatment use.  Logistic regression was used to determine if observed associations persisted after adjustment for sociodemographic and clinical variables.

Results: Our sample consists of 100 participants who had used and 249 who had not used an opioid medication for OA treatment in the last 6 months.  Users, compared to non-users, were younger (mean age 62.5 vs. 64.8), less likely to have an Associate’s Degree or higher (34.0% vs. 51.0%), and less likely to have ≥$40,000 annual household income (25.5% vs. 45.8%).  They also had higher mean WOMAC pain (54.75 vs. 46.76), WOMAC disability (56.64 vs. 44.89), and comorbidity (4.12 vs. 3.23) scores.  Opioid medication users were also more likely to have heard about opioids as treatment for OA (95.9% vs. 71.4%), to have family/friends that received a opioid for OA (77.4% vs. 40.4%), and to have a good understanding of what happens after opioid medication treatment (92.2% vs. 64.7%) [all p-values < 0.005].  Mean [SD] perceived efficacy score was higher (3.90 [0.94] vs. 3.27 [0.94], p< 0.005) while perceived risk score was lower (3.20 [1.18] vs. 3.84 [1.07], p< 0.005) among opioid medicine users than non-users.  When adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical factors, perception of medication benefit (OR 2.05 [95% CI 1.24, 3.41]) and having family/friends that received the medication for OA (OR 7.56 [95% CI 2.51, 22.77]) remained significantly associated with opioid treatment use (Table 1).

Conclusion: Among patients with knee or hip OA, those who used opioid medications, compared to those who did not, were more familiar with opioids, more likely to believe in their efficacy, and less likely to believe in their risks.  Perceived medication efficacy and having family/friends who use the medication were associated with opioid medication use even after controlling for patient sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.


Disclosure: E. Vina, None; J. Dagnino, None; C. Kwoh, Abbvie, 2, Astellas, 5, Astellas and Thusane, 5, EMD Serono, 2, 5, Express Scripts, 5, Novartis, 5, Taiwan Liposome Co., 5, Thusane, 5, TissueGene, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Vina E, Dagnino J, Kwoh C. Attitudes and Beliefs About Opioid Medications: Determining Treatment Use in Osteoarthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/attitudes-and-beliefs-about-opioid-medications-determining-treatment-use-in-osteoarthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/attitudes-and-beliefs-about-opioid-medications-determining-treatment-use-in-osteoarthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology