ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1287

Association of Limited Health Literacy with Patient-Provider Communication in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Ann Barr1, Catherine Howe2, Jennifer Rogers1, Jayanth Doss1, Rebecca Sadun1, Lisa Criscione-Schreiber3, Megan Clowse4, Kai Sun3 and Mithu Maheswaranathan3, 1Duke University, Durham, NC, 2Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, 3Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 4Duke University, Chapel Hill, NC

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: health behaviors, Health literacy, patient provider communication, Patient reported outcomes, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 8, 2021

Title: SLE – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster III: Outcomes (1257–1303)

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Low health literacy is common among US adults, including patients with SLE, and is associated with higher disease activity and worse patient-reported outcomes. The complex nature of managing lupus puts SLE patients with low health literacy at even greater risk of poor outcomes. Limited health literacy has also been associated with worse patient-provider communication in other chronic diseases, though this has not been evaluated in SLE. Our study aimed to explore the relationship between health literacy and patient-provider communication in patients with SLE.

Methods: Patients with SLE meeting ACR/SLICC criteria were recruited from a university lupus clinic. Patient-provider communication data, as measured by the Interpersonal Processes of Care (IPC-29) survey, with a 0-5 range, were collected 7/2018-1/2019. On the IPC-29 survey, we considered a difference of ≥ 0.5 points by median score as clinically significant for each individual question. Health literacy was assessed using the Newest Vital Sign (NVS), a validated 6-item measure of reading comprehension and numeracy; limited health literacy was defined as NVS < 4. The NVS was administered from 9/2020-2/2021 during routine clinic visits and over video call. We compared characteristics median IPC-29 scores between limited and adequate health literacy groups by descriptive statistics, and we stratified the IPC-29 domains by race.

Results: The study included 58 SLE patients (48% white, 48% Black, 5% Hispanic). Median age was 41 years; 97% were female, 59% had at least a college education, and 57% had Medicare or Medicaid, and 45% were on disability. 26% of our cohort was found to have limited health literacy.

Compared to adequate health literacy, those with limited health literacy were more likely to be Black, have Medicare/Medicaid, be on disability, have less than a college education, and have an annual income of ≤$50,000. Patients with limited health literacy were more likely to rate their providers as speaking too quickly, using difficult words, not finding out concerns, and not involving the patient in treatment decisions (Table 1).

Non-Black patients with limited health literacy reported lower provider eliciting of patient concerns, higher discrimination and worse physician compassion and respect compared to those with adequate health literacy. On the other hand, among Black patients, those with limited health literacy reported lower patient-centered decision making (Table 2).

Conclusion: Our results show that low health literacy is common, affecting 1 in 4 patients with SLE. While we did not find major differences in overall perceived communication based on level of health literacy, there were some notable differences in the eliciting concerns, patient-centered decision-making, and compassionate/respectful sub-domains by race. Our results suggest that avoiding fast speech and increasing patient involvement in decision making may be important in improving the patient-provider relationship, especially for those with low health literacy.


Disclosures: A. Barr, None; C. Howe, None; J. Rogers, Exagen, 2, 5, Pfizer, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, Immunovant, 2, Northwestern University, 2; J. Doss, Pfizer, 5; R. Sadun, None; L. Criscione-Schreiber, None; M. Clowse, UCB Pharma, 2, Pfizer, 5, GSK, 2, 5; K. Sun, None; M. Maheswaranathan, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Barr A, Howe C, Rogers J, Doss J, Sadun R, Criscione-Schreiber L, Clowse M, Sun K, Maheswaranathan M. Association of Limited Health Literacy with Patient-Provider Communication in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/association-of-limited-health-literacy-with-patient-provider-communication-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/association-of-limited-health-literacy-with-patient-provider-communication-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology