ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0287

Association Between Short-Term Response to Upadacitinib Treatment and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Prior Inadequate Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Therapy

Christina Charles-Schoeman1, Roy Fleischmann2, Stephen Hall3, Arthur Kavanaugh4, Andrea Rubbert-Roth5, Ryan DeMasi6, Sara Penn6, Andrew Garrison6, Samuel Anyanwu6, Radames Sierra-Zorita7 and Ricardo Xavier8, 1Division of Rheumatology, University of California, Los Angeles, Santa Monica, CA, 2University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Metroplex Clinical Research Center, Dallas, TX, 3Emeritus Research and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, 4University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 5Division of Rheumatology, Cantonal Clinic St Gallen, St.Gallen, Switzerland, 6AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL, 7University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico, 8Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Anti-TNF Drugs, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), Randomized Trial, rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 12, 2022

Title: RA – Treatment Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Early predictors of response to treatment with upadacitinib (UPA), an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, could help to optimize a treat-to-target approach in patients with RA. This post hoc analysis evaluated whether early response to UPA treatment correlated with subsequent achievement of long-term clinical outcomes in patients with RA in whom ≥1 TNF inhibitor had previously failed.

Methods: Data on patients who received UPA 15 mg once daily in whom ≥1 TNF inhibitor had failed (including patients with inadequate response or intolerance; TNFi-IR) were analyzed from two Phase 3 trials: SELECT-BEYOND and SELECT-CHOICE. Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were used to assess whether a ≥6-point improvement in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and a ≥1.2-point improvement in DAS 28-joint count with CRP (DAS28-CRP) at Weeks 4 and 12 predicted achievement of CDAI low disease activity (LDA) or remission (≤10 or ≤2.8, respectively) and DAS28-CRP ≤3.2 and < 2.6, at Weeks 24 and 48 in SELECT-BEYOND, and at Week 24 in SELECT-CHOICE. Non-responder imputation was used for missing data.

Results: The analysis included 140 TNFi-IR patients (89% inadequate response, 11% intolerant) from SELECT-BEYOND and 258 TNFi-IR patients (84% inadequate response, 16% intolerant) from SELECT-CHOICE. Across the studies, CDAI LDA and remission were achieved by 50–58% and 11–23% of patients, respectively (Figure 1). At Weeks 4 and 12 in SELECT-BEYOND, 31 (22%) and 14 (10%) patients, respectively, failed to achieve CDAI improvement ≥6 from baseline (Table 1). Of these, 9 (29%) and 2 (14%) patients achieved LDA, and 1 (3%) and 0 achieved remission at Week 24. The Week 24 NPVs for CDAI LDA were higher for Week 12 (86%) than Week 4 (71%); but similar for remission (97% [Week 4] and 100% [Week 12]). At Week 48, 12 patients (39%) and 1 patient (7%) without ≥6 CDAI improvement at Weeks 4 and 12, respectively, achieved CDAI LDA, while 2 (6%) and 0 achieved remission. The patterns and magnitude of the corresponding Week 48 NPVs were similar to those at Week 24 (Table 1). In SELECT-CHOICE, similar patterns to SELECT-BEYOND were seen at Week 24 in patients who did achieve CDAI improvement ≥6 from baseline (Table 2). Similar trends were observed when assessing the ability of DAS28 CRP improvement < 1.2/≥1.2 from baseline to Weeks 4 and 12 to predict DAS28 CRP ≤3.2 and < 2.6 treatment targets at Weeks 24 and 48 in SELECT-BEYOND and at Week 24 in SELECT-CHOICE.

Conclusion: Although most patients receiving UPA achieved early improvements in CDAI and DAS28-CRP scores, patients who did not demonstrate improvements of ≥6 in CDAI or ≥1.2 in DAS28-CRP within 12 weeks were unlikely to achieve disease activity targets with long-term treatment. Therefore, these patients may benefit from therapy adjustment, consistent with treat-to-target recommendations.

Supporting image 1

Table 1. Probabilities of achieving long-term CDAI treatment targets in SELECT-BEYOND based on Week 4 and 12 responses

Supporting image 2

Figure 1. Proportion of patients achieving Week 24 and Week 48 responses in SELECT BEYOND, and Week 24 responses in SELECT CHOICE


Disclosures: C. Charles-Schoeman, AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Pfizer, Regeneron-Sanofi, Gilead; R. Fleischmann, AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galvani, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Galapagos; S. Hall, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Lilly, Janssen, UCB, Novartis, Amgen, Gilead, Merck; A. Kavanaugh, AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), Celgene, Centocor-Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, UCB; A. Rubbert-Roth, None; R. DeMasi, AbbVie; S. Penn, AbbVie; A. Garrison, AbbVie Inc.; S. Anyanwu, AbbVie; R. Sierra-Zorita, AbbVie; R. Xavier, AbbVie, Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Charles-Schoeman C, Fleischmann R, Hall S, Kavanaugh A, Rubbert-Roth A, DeMasi R, Penn S, Garrison A, Anyanwu S, Sierra-Zorita R, Xavier R. Association Between Short-Term Response to Upadacitinib Treatment and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Prior Inadequate Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Therapy [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/association-between-short-term-response-to-upadacitinib-treatment-and-long-term-clinical-outcomes-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-prior-inadequate-response-to-tumor-necrosis-factor-inhibitor/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/association-between-short-term-response-to-upadacitinib-treatment-and-long-term-clinical-outcomes-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-prior-inadequate-response-to-tumor-necrosis-factor-inhibitor/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology