ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 410

Association between Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibody Status and the Incidence of Erosive Disease in Patients with RA

Leslie R Harrold1, Heather J. Litman2, SE Connolly3, E Alemao3, Sabrina Rebello4, W Hua2 and Joel Kremer5, 1University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, 2Corrona, Southborough, MA, 3Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, 4Corrona, LLC, Southborough, MA, 5Albany Medical College and The Center for Rheumatology, Albany, NY

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: ACPA, Rheumatoid Factor and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Clinical Aspects Poster I: Treatment Patterns and Response

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: RA is characterized by the production of autoantibodies including anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs).1 ACPAs are considered a prognostic indicator for more severe RA and more rapid disease progression.2,3 Little is known regarding the incidence of erosions overall in a contemporary cohort of patients with access to biologics or the association with ACPA status. This analysis aimed to characterize the incidence of erosive disease and its association with ACPA serological status in patients with RA.

Methods: We identified patients aged ≥18 years with RA disease duration ≤2 years who were enrolled in the Corrona Registry (October 2001 to June 2016) with ACPA status available at or before their enrollment visit and no evidence of erosions on their first visit at which radiographic information was reported. To assess incidence of erosions, we followed patients until their first radiograph showed evidence of erosions or their last follow-up visit, whichever came first. The primary outcome was the incidence of erosions (calculated as the total number of first erosions divided by the total radiographic follow-up time), overall and by ACPA status (negative anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide [CCP] <20 vs positive anti-CCP ≥20), unadjusted and adjusted (for age and baseline disease activity using the CDAI). Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to assess the hazard ratio (HR) (with 95% CIs) of erosive disease.

Results: In total, 693 patients (452 ACPA positive and 241 ACPA negative) met the inclusion criteria. Most were women (70.6%), middle-aged (mean [SD] 55 [13.3] years), with moderate disease activity based on the CDAI (13.9 [13.0]). Prior use of ≥1 biologic/targeted synthetic DMARD had occurred in 29.3% of patients. In total, 187 first erosions over 1344.27 person-years of radiographic follow-up time were recorded with an incidence rate of 13.9 erosions/100 person-years of follow-up. The incidence of erosions among ACPA-positive patients was 14.8/100 person-years vs 12.2/100 person-years in those who were ACPA negative (unadjusted HR 1.21; 95% CI 0.88, 1.67; p=0.23; Table). In adjusted analyses, ACPA status was associated with the incidence of erosions (HR 1.30; 95% CI 0.94, 1.80; p=0.11), although the estimate included unity (Table).

Table. Incidence Rate Overall and by ACPA Status

Total number of first erosions

Total number of person-years of radiographic follow-up time

Incidence rate of erosions (per 100 person-years)

Unadjusted HR (95% CI)

Adjusted*

HR (95% CI)

Overall

187

1344.27

13.9

By ACPA status

ACPA+

132

893.60

14.8

1.21 (0.88, 1.67)

p=0.23

1.30 (0.94, 1.80)

p=0.11

ACPA–

55

450.67

12.2

reference

reference

*Adjusted for baseline CDAI score (0–10, >10–22, >22) and baseline age (18–<45, 45–<55, 55–<65, 65–90 years)

ACPA=anti-citrullinated protein antibody; HR=hazard ratio

Conclusion:

In this contemporary cohort of patients with early RA, incident erosions were common. Our findings suggest further exploration of the association of ACPAs and the incidence of erosions is needed, and whether medications including biologic/targeted synthetic DMARDs influence the relationship.

1. Scott DL, et al. Lancet 2010;376:1094–108.

2. Hecht C, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2015;74:2151–6.

3. Aletaha D, et al. Arthritis Res Ther 2015;17:229.


Disclosure: L. R. Harrold, Corrona, 1,Pfizer Inc, 2,Roche Pharmaceuticals, 5,Corrona, 3; H. J. Litman, Corrona, 3; S. Connolly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1; E. Alemao, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3,Bristol-Myers Squibb, 1; S. Rebello, Corrona, 3; W. Hua, Corrona, 3; J. Kremer, Corrona, 1,AbbVie, BMS, Genentech, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, 2,Corrona, 3,Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc., 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Harrold LR, Litman HJ, Connolly S, Alemao E, Rebello S, Hua W, Kremer J. Association between Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibody Status and the Incidence of Erosive Disease in Patients with RA [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/association-between-anti-citrullinated-protein-antibody-status-and-the-incidence-of-erosive-disease-in-patients-with-ra/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/association-between-anti-citrullinated-protein-antibody-status-and-the-incidence-of-erosive-disease-in-patients-with-ra/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology