ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 800

Assessment of Recent Evidence to Support Treatment Recommendations in Patients with SSc-ILD

Anna-Maria Hoffmann-Vold1, Toby Maher2, Edward Philpot3, Ali Ashrafzadeh4, Diwakar Jha5, Margarida Alves6 and Oliver Distler7, 1Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 2Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom, 3IQVIA, Durham, NC, 4IQVIA, Los Angeles, CA, 5IQVIA, Gurugram, India, 6Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim, Germany, 7Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: interstitial lung disease, meta-analysis, systemic sclerosis and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: Systemic Sclerosis and Related Disorders – Clinical Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) is a chronic autoimmune disease characterized by fibrosis of skin and internal organs with an estimated worldwide prevalence of 110-430 cases/million. SSc involves the lung, with Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) being the leading cause of death. The objective of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to review the available scientific evidence to guide decisions on screening; treatment initiation, change or escalation; disease progression and influence on subsequent treatment decisions in SSc-ILD.

Methods:

The SLR was conducted according to NICE, CRD and IQWiG guidance for undertaking reviews in healthcare, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology. To update on most recent developments, the search strategy covered literature published from 2016-2018. Population, Intervention, Comparator and Outcomes criteria (PICO) were used to select publications at title/abstract and full-text screening. Data was extracted in six categories: screening/risk stratification; current treatments; treatment initiation/escalation; disease progression; treatment algorithms and biomarkers for ILD in SSc. The quality of evidence extracted was assessed using GRADE 2007 criteria.

Results:

After title and abstract screening of the initial 887 citations found, 260 publications were full-text screened and 163 included in the analysis.

Although evidence was most prolific in the screening/risk stratification category for SSc-ILD, the information extracted in the biomarkers category showed a higher grade of evidence (average medium/high vs medium/low). Although HRCT and DLCO still remain as main screening tools, some biomarkers are already in use for diagnosis and prognosis of SSc-ILD. These include genetic- (ALOX5AP gene polymorphisms), cellular- (neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio), and plasma biomarkers (antibodies such as ATA, ACA, anti-CXT, or chemokines such as CCl18, KL6, CCL-2 or IL-10).

Evidence on lung disease progression was also graded medium/low, and the lowest volume and weakest evidence was observed in the current treatment; treatment algorithms; and treatment initiation/escalation categories. Immunosuppressive drugs (mycophenolate mofetil, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine and rituximab) were used as the recommended therapeutic approach.

Conclusion:

This SLR found that the identification, validation and application of biomarkers as the main field of interest in SSc-ILD research, reflecting progress for early diagnosis and subsequent prognosis of this disease. In contrast, there was a dearth of robust evidence and no clear consensus on therapeutic interventions, highlighting the need for further evidence to support treatment options.


Disclosure: A. M. Hoffmann-Vold, None; T. Maher, GSK, 2, 5,UCB, Inc., 2, 5, 6,Boehringer Ingelheim, Astra Zeneca, Roche, Bayer, Biogen Idec, Cipla, Prometic, Sanumed, 5,Apellis, 1; E. Philpot, IQVIA, 3; A. Ashrafzadeh, IQVIA, 3; D. Jha, IQVIA, 3; M. Alves, Boehringer Ingelheim, 3; O. Distler, Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Roche, 2,Actelion, AnaMar, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, ChemolmAb, espeRare foundation, Genentech/Roche, GSK, Inventiva, Italfarmaco, Lilly, medac, Medlmmune, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Sinoxa, UCB, 5,Patent mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis licensed, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Hoffmann-Vold AM, Maher T, Philpot E, Ashrafzadeh A, Jha D, Alves M, Distler O. Assessment of Recent Evidence to Support Treatment Recommendations in Patients with SSc-ILD [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessment-of-recent-evidence-to-support-treatment-recommendations-in-patients-with-ssc-ild/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessment-of-recent-evidence-to-support-treatment-recommendations-in-patients-with-ssc-ild/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology