ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2301

Assessing the Utility and Impact of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound in a Large Pediatric Rheumatology Clinic

Onengiya Harry1, Jennifer L. Huggins2, Janalee Taylor3, Michael J. Holland4 and Tracy Ting5, 1Cincinnati Childrens' Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, 2Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, 3Division of Rheumatology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, 4Pediatric Rheumatology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, 5Rheumatology/MLC 4010, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Education, musculoskeletal sonography, patient, pediatric rheumatology and ultrasound

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Pediatric Rheumatology – Clinical and Therapeutic Aspects Poster III: Juvenile Arthritis

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) use in the care of pediatric rheumatology patients is increasing. Yet, despite the growing availability of MSUS, it remains unclear how best to utilize ultrasound within a busy pediatric rheumatology clinic – and how its results might affect patient care. A questionnaire was developed to assess the following: reasons for referral, correlation with clinical assessment, changes to management, and the patient/parent experience. The aim of this study is to evaluate physicians’ responses on the utility and impact of MSUS.

Methods: Beginning September 2016, pediatric rheumatology providers from a large tertiary care center with an established MSUS clinic were given a short questionnaire after the completion of a patient MSUS session. The questionnaire included 4 main outcome variables: normal or abnormal MSUS findings, consistency of MSUS results with clinical exam, family’s response to MSUS, and impact on management decisions. Secondary outcomes were: reasons for referral, how MSUS findings correlate to clinical exam (better, worse, or same), aid in family’s understanding of diagnosis, and influence on clinical management – (no change, maximize dose of medication, perform joint injection, or other). Descriptive analysis was performed on collected responses with frequency distribution reported for each variable.

Results: Survey responses were collected on 86 patients. The majority of referrals were placed to evaluate the extent of disease activity. Other reasons included the identification of active joint/tendon(s) for possible joint injection and in instances of discordance between clinical exam and patient symptoms. 80% of the MSUS results were abnormal; and 51% of the time, providers did not anticipate the results. While 51% of MSUS findings were consistent with clinical exam, 41% identified more active joint/tendon(s). 66.3% of the time MSUS result had an impact on management decision. Of the 57 cases where MSUS influenced clinical management: 46% had medications maximized and 44% underwent joint injection. Providers reported that 97% of families found MSUS helpful in general; while 81% found it useful in their understanding of their child’s disease.

Conclusion: MSUS is a valuable tool to complement clinical examination in the care of children with rheumatologic disease. For a majority of referred patients, MSUS helped to assess disease activity and shape clinical management. MSUS can be an important screening tool in identifying worsening, or improving, disease than may be clinically apparent. This ongoing study suggests that there may be a role for MSUS in educating parents/children about their disease. A survey of families is needed to better clarify the impact of MSUS on their understanding of their disease.


Disclosure: O. Harry, None; J. L. Huggins, Pfizer Inc, 2; J. Taylor, None; M. J. Holland, None; T. Ting, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Harry O, Huggins JL, Taylor J, Holland MJ, Ting T. Assessing the Utility and Impact of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound in a Large Pediatric Rheumatology Clinic [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessing-the-utility-and-impact-of-musculoskeletal-ultrasound-in-a-large-pediatric-rheumatology-clinic/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessing-the-utility-and-impact-of-musculoskeletal-ultrasound-in-a-large-pediatric-rheumatology-clinic/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology