ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1177

Assessing Resident Needs and Faculty Perceptions for Rheumatology Curriculum Development

Lauren He1, Kichul Ko1, Laarni Quimson2, David Leverenz3, Shannon Martin1 and Didem Saygin1, 1University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 2University of Chicago, Oak Park, IL, 3Duke University, Durham, NC

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: education, medical

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 8, 2021

Title: Professional Education Poster (1170–1195)

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: The goal of rheumatology rotation during internal medicine (IM) residency is to develop competency in work-up and treatment of common rheumatological conditions. IM residents spend less time in rheumatology compared to other subspecialties, necessitating a well-structured curriculum tailored towards resident needs and various clinical settings. In this study, we aimed to identify resident learning needs and preferences during inpatient and outpatient rheumatology rotations to improve the curriculum.

Methods: We distributed surveys to all the current IM residents at the IM Residency Program and rheumatology faculty/fellows in the Section of Rheumatology via email. Rheumatology faculty/fellows were asked to rank 10 rheumatology topics based on the importance. The resident survey assessed confidence in caring for patients with rheumatologic condition in inpatient and outpatient settings on a 10-point Likert scale. Both resident and attending/fellow surveys assessed respondent to rank their preferred learning modality in inpatient and outpatient settings. No validated instruments were available for these purposes; therefore, we created the surveys used in this study.

Results: Out of 13 rheumatology faculty/fellows, 11 (7/4; 84%) completed the survey. Out of 124 residents, 35 (28.2%) including 8 PGY-1, 13 PGY-2, 10 PGY-3, 3 PGY-4 and 1 PGY-5 completed the survey. Among respondents, 37% had rheumatology rotation in medical school and 66% in residency. Four residents (11%) were interested in rheumatology fellowship, and majority (77%) had interest in learning more about rheumatology.

The most important topics to learn during rheumatology rotation per faculty/fellows were knowing when to order and how to interpret autoimmune serologies, followed by musculoskeletal exam and crystalline arthritis (Figure 1). Median confidence level [IQR] among residents for caring for patients with rheumatological conditions was 6 [3.6-7.5] for inpatient and 5 [3.7-6.5] for outpatient settings (10 being very confident). Topics with least reported confidence included joint injections, spondyloarthritis, and other ANA-associated disorders.

Among attendings/fellows, the most preferred outpatient teaching modality was case-based and least preferred was directing trainees to relevant resources. On the inpatient side, directing to relevant resources was the 2nd most preferred modality after bedside teaching (Figure 2). Among residents, the most preferred learning modality was bedside/case-based learning (54-63%) and the least preferred was being directed to resources for self-learning (51-74%) in both settings. Formal lectures were preferred more by residents than attendings/fellows in both settings.

Conclusion: This study showed that average confidence level of residents for most rheumatology topics was moderate (5 out of 10). There was a high degree of concordance between residents and rheumatology faculty/fellows for their preferred education modality in outpatient setting, whereas discordance existed on inpatient setting. Being directed to relevant resources for self-learning was not preferred among residents, while faculty/fellows preferred this option commonly in the inpatient setting.

Figure 1. Most important rheumatology topics to learn during rheumatology rotation per rheumatology faculty/fellows and confidence level among residents for each topic [median with IQR]

Figure 2. Preferred learning/teaching modalities for rheumatology faculty/fellows and medicine residents in inpatient and outpatient settings


Disclosures: L. He, None; K. Ko, E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C., 12, Education and Food/Beverage, EMD Serono, 5, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 1, 12, Food and Beverage, Janssen, 5, 12, Food and Beverage; L. Quimson, None; D. Leverenz, Pfizer, 5; S. Martin, None; D. Saygin, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

He L, Ko K, Quimson L, Leverenz D, Martin S, Saygin D. Assessing Resident Needs and Faculty Perceptions for Rheumatology Curriculum Development [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessing-resident-needs-and-faculty-perceptions-for-rheumatology-curriculum-development/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessing-resident-needs-and-faculty-perceptions-for-rheumatology-curriculum-development/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology