ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 655

Assessing Perceptions, Barriers, and Preferences to Exercise in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Gabriel Jeyasingham1, Arzoo Alam 1, Nicholas Steiner 2, Kimberly Legault 1, Mark Matsos 1 and Karen Beattie 1, 1McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, 2Western University, London, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and exercise

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 10, 2019

Title: SLE – Clinical Poster I: Epidemiology & Pathogenesis

Session Type: Poster Session (Sunday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Cardiovascular disease is a significant cause of mortality in patients with SLE. High levels of fatigue are also reported in patients with SLE and negatively impact quality of life. Physical activity is associated with improvements in both cardiovascular disease and fatigue, but trials of exercise interventions involve activities that may not be feasible or sustainable outside the formal setting of a study. Our objective is to understand the perceptions, attitudes, barriers and preferences to exercise in patients with SLE.

Methods: Patients ≥18 years old with SLE seen in the Lupus Clinic at McMaster University Medical Centre were invited to complete a short questionnaire during their routine clinic appointments. This questionnaire, adapted from an exercise questionnaire validated in an osteoporosis population, contained four sections: 1) patient characteristics, 2) perceptions and attitudes towards exercise, 3) perceived barriers to exercise, and 4) preferences to performing exercise.

Results: Respondents included 49 females and 6 males (mean (SD) age 39 (12.9) years), of whom 32 worked full-time, 9 worked part-time and 14 were not employed. Almost half (n=25, 45%) reported caring for children or family members. Most patients (89%, n=49) reported having barriers to exercise. Those most frequently reported (Figure 1) included fatigue (n=39, 71%), lack of time (n=27, 49%), weather conditions (n=18, 33%), and lack of motivation (n=17, 31%). About 87% (n=48) of respondents were willing to change their daily routine to include more exercise. Walking was the most preferred exercise (n=43, 78%), followed by strengthening exercises (n=41, 75%) and flexibility exercises (n=28, 51%). After performing vigorous exercise, 49% (n=27) of patients thought they would feel better compared to when they do not exercise while 18% (n=10) thought they would feel the same and 33% (n=18) thought they would feel worse. After performing moderate exercise, 64% (n=35) of patients reported feeling better, 27% (n=15) reported feeling the same, and 9% (n=5) reported feeling worse.

Conclusion: The majority of our patients were female of child-rearing years. Many were employed full-time and were primary caregivers, which may explain fatigue and time being the most commonly reported barriers to exercise. Walking was overwhelmingly the most preferred type of exercise. Most patients found moderate exercise to be beneficial, while a sizeable minority thought vigorous activity would be detrimental. Most patients expressed willingness to incorporate more physical activity into their daily routine. There is a need for a feasible exercise regimen that considers barriers and personal preferences in patients with SLE.

Figure 1: Frequency of barriers to exercise in patients with SLE. The x-axis indicates the barriers to exercise cited by patients. The y-axis depicts the percentage of respondents who cited each barrier. The most frequently cited barriers include fatigue, lack of time, weather, and lack of motivation.


Disclosure: G. Jeyasingham, None; A. Alam, None; N. Steiner, None; K. Legault, None; M. Matsos, None; K. Beattie, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Jeyasingham G, Alam A, Steiner N, Legault K, Matsos M, Beattie K. Assessing Perceptions, Barriers, and Preferences to Exercise in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessing-perceptions-barriers-and-preferences-to-exercise-in-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessing-perceptions-barriers-and-preferences-to-exercise-in-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology