ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2565

Assessing Participation in the Lupus Sister Circle Support Group

Khadija Dantata, Wendy Rodgers and Lety Ocana, The Lupus Foundation of America, Washington, DC

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Disparities, mental health, Social support, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Women's health

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Title: (2547–2566) ARP Posters I

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Relative to White people with lupus (PWL), Black/African American (B/AA) PWL are three times as likely to develop lupus and suffer a severe form of the disease and death (Ramos, 2021). Additionally, B/AA PWL experience unique challenges including lack of emotional support, more active disease, and organ involvement compared to White PWL (Buie, 2023). To address gaps in emotional support amongst B/AA PWL, the Lupus Foundation of America (LFA) established The Lupus Sister Circle in 2021, a national virtual support group created to meet the unique needs of B/AA PWL. With over 700 registrants, the support group is led by trained peer facilitators and is the most well-attended LFA support group. We surveyed all registrants to examine the reasons they attend the monthly virtual meeting via Zoom and gather feedback on the value and content of the meetings.

Methods: An online survey was distributed via Qualtrics to analyze the data. Collected data included demographic information, reasons for attending the support group, connection to lupus, type of lupus diagnosis, years living with the condition, and perceived meeting value and content. Descriptive statistics were compiled and analyzed.

Results: A total of 210 responses were collected. Demographic characteristics of the respondents are illustrated in Table 1. Regarding their connection to lupus, 93% (n = 194) reported to have lupus, 2% (n = 4) think they might have lupus, 7% (n = 14) have a family member with lupus, and 1% (n = 3) reported another type of connection with lupus. In terms of type of lupus diagnosis, 95% (n = 197) reported to have SLE, 19% (n = 39) have cutaneous lupus, and 1% (n = 3) have drug-induced lupus. Half of the respondents had been living with lupus for more than 10 years, 2% (n = 5) of the respondents were diagnosed with lupus less 1 year, 13% (n = 28) were diagnosed 1-2 years ago, 19% (n = 40) were diagnosed 3-5 years ago, and 15% (n = 32) reported to be living with lupus for 6-10 years. Figure 1 illustrates why participants attend the support group. Figure 2 illustrates participants’ feedback on meeting value and content. The support group received an overall respondent rating of 4.61 on a 5-point scale, where 5 signifies “excellent.”

Conclusion: The LFA’s Lupus Sister Circle support group addresses the needs of those most vulnerable to the disease. Survey findings reinforce the need for and value of this support group. The Lupus Sister Circle aims to continue bridging the gap by providing credible and up-to-date educational resources on lupus treatment and management, coping strategies, and an emotionally supportive, safe space for its members.

Supporting image 1Table 1

Demographics of Respondents n=210*

*values may not add up due to missing data or multiple selections

Supporting image 2Figure 1

n=210*

*values may not add up due to missing data or multiple selections

Supporting image 3Figure 2

n=210*

*values may not add up due to missing data or multiple selections


Disclosures: K. Dantata: None; W. Rodgers: None; L. Ocana: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Dantata K, Rodgers W, Ocana L. Assessing Participation in the Lupus Sister Circle Support Group [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessing-participation-in-the-lupus-sister-circle-support-group/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessing-participation-in-the-lupus-sister-circle-support-group/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology