ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0780

Assessing Differential Effects of DMARDs on Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and Patient Global Assessment in Subgroups of Patients with Active PsA Treated over 52-weeks with Secukinumab in a Non-Interventional Trial (AQUILA) Using a Multistage Clustering Approach

Michaela Koehm1, Maximilian Klippstein2, Sabine Kugler3, Sina Mackay3, Daniel Schulz3, Asmir Vodencarevic4, Guillaume Wendt4, Daniel Peterlik4, Uta Kiltz5, Jan Brandt-Juergens6 and Frank Behrens7, 1University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany, 2Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Fraunhofer Cluster of Excellence Immune Mediated Diseases CIMD, Frankfurt, Germany, 3Fraunhofer Institute for Intelligent Analysis and Information Systems IAIS, Fraunhofer Cluster of Excellence Immune Mediated Diseases CIMD, Sankt Augustin, Germany, 4Novartis Pharma GmbH, Nürnberg, Germany, 5Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany, 6rheumatologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Berlin, Germany, 7Goethe-University & Fraunhofer ITMP, Frankfurt, Germany

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Bioinformatics, Biomarkers, clinical trial, Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 12, 2023

Title: Abstracts: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment I: PsA

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:00PM-3:30PM

Background/Purpose: Individualized treatment strategies are of high importance in the treatment of patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA), a heterogeneous immune-mediated disease. IL-17 inhibition has demonstrated efficacy in all domains of PsA. Nevertheless, approx. 30% of patients will not achieve remission after initiation of therapy. Therefore, the identification of patient characteristics with a high impact on treatment response is important to guide treatment choice and its adjustments in clinical routine care to promote an improved outcome. An adapted machine learning approach (cluster analysis) was used to analyze baseline (BL) patient characteristics to detect clinical patterns of disease activity in PsA patients treated in a non-interventional trial with secukinumab (SEC).

Methods: Data from 1257 patients from the German non-interventional study AQUILA with active PsA whose first SEC treatment occurred no more than 4 weeks prior to BL was analyzed. All patients were included irrespective of treatment response. We identified patient groups by applying an extended version of the machine learning method of hierarchical density-based clustering to the BL data, where features included patient and disease characteristics variables as well as standardized patient-reported outcomes (Table 1). Feature groups with high numbers of missing values were initially excluded, and subsequent clustering was performed to achieve stepwise integration of all features. At each step, an additional feature group was included in a re-clustering using a complete subset of subjects. This led to a further split of some of the original clusters. For every final cluster, disease activity over the course of the study was visualized including patient and physician-derived assessments.

Results: The machine learning approach resulted in the categorization of 14 different clusters of patients and outliers (n=391, cluster -1) (Fig. 1). The focus is directed towards two medically relevant clusters that differ primarily in their pretreatments prior to SEC. Cluster 1 included PsA patients with predominantly bDMARD pretreatment incl. IL-23-inhibitors, while cluster 2 primarily received csDMARD pretreatments including apremilast (Fig. 2). Cluster 1, showed a greater reduction in disease activity than cluster 2 as measured by PASI and PGA (mean reduction: PASI: cluster 1: 8.0, cluster 2: 5.6; PGA: cluster 1: 2.8, cluster 2: 2.4) by week 52 (Fig. 2). However, these comparisons did not reach statistical significance for this sample.

Conclusion: We present a machine-learning approach to exploring the association between BL features of patients treated with SEC and their disease activity scores in the large PsA cohort of the AQUILA trial. The cluster analysis revealed that pretreatment with bDMARDs did not affect the efficacy of SEC compared to the predominantly csDMARD patient cohort (predominantly bDMARD naïve). PASI and PGA tend to have a stronger improvement in patients pretreated with bDMARDs than in patients pretreated with csDMARDs including apremilast after 52 weeks of treatment with SEC.

Supporting image 1

Table 1: Overview of dataset characteristics of 1,257 PsA patients at baseline, across all 14 clusters. *Total n can differ from 1,257 in table, due to missing values, ** stroke, chronic heart failure or coronary heart disease, *** for enthesitis patients only

Supporting image 2

Figure 1: Result of multistage clustering of BL characteristics of 1,257 active PSA patients. The clustering reveals 14 clusters and outliers (cluster –1). Important cluster characteristics: Cluster 1, pretreatment with bDMARDs (including IL_23i); Cluster 2, pretreatment with csDMARDs (including apremilast). The scatterplot of the patient characteristics is created by the dimension reduction TSNE to 2 dimensions and thus has, resulting in arbitrary units on the axes.

Supporting image 3

Figure 2 (A) Median BL characteristics of patients of cluster 1 and cluster 2 (B) Mean PASI with standard error of patients of cluster 1 and cluster 2 over the course of the study up to W52 (visit 6) (C) Mean PGA with standard error of patients of cluster 1 and cluster 2 over the course of the study up to W52 (visit 6).


Disclosures: M. Koehm: Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Novartis GmbH, 2, 5, 6; M. Klippstein: Novartis GmbH, 5; S. Kugler: Novartis GmbH, 5; S. Mackay: Novartis GmbH, 5; D. Schulz: Novartis GmbH, 5; A. Vodencarevic: Novartis, 3; G. Wendt: Novartis GmbH, 3; D. Peterlik: Novartis, 3; U. Kiltz: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 5, Biocad, 2, 6, Biogen, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 5, Chugai, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Fresenius, 5, Gilead, 2, 5, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), 5, Grünenthal, 2, 6, Hexal, 5, Janssen, 2, 6, MSD, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, onkowiessen.de, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Roche, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 6, Viatris, 2, 5; J. Brandt-Juergens: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, 6, Affibody, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Gilead, 2, Janssen, 2, 6, Medac, 2, 6, Merck/MSD, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, Roche, 2, 6, Sanofi-Aventis, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 6; F. Behrens: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, 5, 6, Affibody, 2, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Bionorica, 2, 5, 6, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, 5, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 5, 6, Chugai Pharma GmbH, 2, 5, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, Galapagos, 2, 5, 6, Genzyme, 2, 5, 6, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, 5, 6, Iron4u, 2, 5, 6, Leo, 2, 5, 6, Merck/MSD, 2, 5, 6, Moon-Lake, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Roche, 2, 5, 6, Sandoz, 2, 5, 6, Sanofi, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Koehm M, Klippstein M, Kugler S, Mackay S, Schulz D, Vodencarevic A, Wendt G, Peterlik D, Kiltz U, Brandt-Juergens J, Behrens F. Assessing Differential Effects of DMARDs on Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and Patient Global Assessment in Subgroups of Patients with Active PsA Treated over 52-weeks with Secukinumab in a Non-Interventional Trial (AQUILA) Using a Multistage Clustering Approach [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessing-differential-effects-of-dmards-on-psoriasis-area-and-severity-index-and-patient-global-assessment-in-subgroups-of-patients-with-active-psa-treated-over-52-weeks-with-secukinumab-in-a-non-int/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/assessing-differential-effects-of-dmards-on-psoriasis-area-and-severity-index-and-patient-global-assessment-in-subgroups-of-patients-with-active-psa-treated-over-52-weeks-with-secukinumab-in-a-non-int/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology