ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0177

Artificial intelligence in adult and paediatric rheumatology practice and research: pilot results from an international survey

Ana Isabel Rebollo-Gimenez1, Saverio La bella2, Krystel Aouad3, Latika Gupta4, Davide Cangelosi5, Thomas Högle6, Johannes Knitza7, Nicolino Ruperto8, Vincenzo Venerito9, Abdellah El Maghraoui10, Alessandra Alongi11, Wilson bautista molano12, Deniz Bayraktar13, Thomas Davergne14, Dzifa Dey15, Ihsane Hmamouchi16, Alison Hoens17, Linda Li17, Angela Migowa18, Erin Treemarcki19, Nelly Ziade20, Tue Kragstrup21 and Diego Benavent22, 1Department of Rheumatology, Gregorio Marañon University Hospital, Gregorio Marañon Health Research Institute, Madrid, Spain, 2UOC Reumatologia e Malattie Autoinfiammatorie, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy, 3Department of Rheumatology, Saint George Hospital University Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon, 4School of Infection, Inflammation and Immunology, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham; Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust; Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester; Francis Crick Institute, London, Birmingham, UK, United Kingdom, 5Unità di Bioinformatica Clinica, Direzione Scientifica, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy, 6Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Lausanne (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, 7Institute for Digital Medicine, University Hospital Gießen-Marburg, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany, 8Université Milano Bicocca and Fondazione IRCSS S. Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza, Monza and Brianza, Italy, 9Univeristy of Bari "Aldo Moro", Italy, Bari, Bari, Italy, 10Department of Rheumatology, Military Hospital Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco, 11Università Milano Bicocca, Milano, MILAN, Italy, 12University Hospital Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota, Bogota, Colombia, 13Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Izmir Katip Celebi University. Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia., Izmir, Turkey, 14Department of rehabilitation.Team METHODS, CRESS UMR 1153 – University of Paris Cité, Paris, France, 15Rheumatology Unit Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Korle bu Teaching Hospital, University of Ghana Medical School, Accra, Ghana, 16Health Sciences Research Center (CReSS).Faculty of Medicine, International University of Rabat, Rabat, Morocco, 17Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 18Aga Khan University Medical College East Africa, Nairobi, Kenya, 19Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Rheumatology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 20Department of Rheumatology, Saint-Joseph University and Hotel-Dieu de France, Beirut, Lebanon, 21Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University & Rheumatology Sector, Medical Diagnostic Center, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Aarhus C, Denmark, 22Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Madrid, Spain

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Bioinformatics, Health Services Research, population studies, Qualitative Research

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0175–0198) Health Services Research Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming rheumatology care, with innovative tools now empowering physicians and health professionals (HPRs). Our survey examines how adult and pediatric rheumatologists, and HPRs currently perceive and utilize AI tools in rheumatology clinical and research environments, by identifying their experiences, concerns, and unmet needs.

Methods: An international, cross-continental online survey following CROSS & CHERRIES frameworks was shared in March 2025 to gather perspectives from the adult and paediatric rheumatology community. The questionnaire included 27 questions, both multiple-choice and open-ended, in four sections: sample characteristics, AI usage and applications, opinions and concerns, and expectations for AI implementation in clinical practice and research.

Results: By early May 2025, a total of 263 respondents (63.5% female) from 43 countries completed the survey, including rheumatologists, paediatric rheumatologists, and HPRs (figure 1). Median age of responders was 38 [IQR 32–48.5] years; only a minority of participants primarily worked in paediatric rheumatology (52, 19.8%), as HPRs (24, 9.1%), or mainly in research rather than clinical practice (54, 20.5%).Most respondents (220, 83.7%) reported using large language models (LLMs) for medical purposes, commonly for text editing (176, 66.9%), brainstorming (137, 52.1%), summarizing papers (133, 50.6%), and manuscript writing assistance (115, 43.7%); only 30 (11.4%) respondents had never used LLMs. Attitudes towards AI were predominantly positive, with 204 (81.4%) expressing optimism regarding AI’s efficacy and safety. However, up to 151 (58.1%) participants emphasized the need for strict AI regulation in medicine.AI literacy was highly valued, with 214 (81.6%) rating it as very or extremely important, with 92 (35.5%) having or having had subscriptions to AI models/tools. Respondents favoured LLM use for practical tasks: email drafting (191, 72.9%), copy-editing (191, 74%), generating manuscript sections (136, 51.9%), and facilitating reference access (157, 59.9%). Substantial support existed for integrating AI into peer review, assisting reviewers (118, 45%) and editors (112, 42.7%). Respondents indicated AI’s greatest future impact in research (212, 80.6%), diagnosis (183, 69.6%), and administrative tasks (177, 67.3%).Key concerns included ethical issues (176, 67.2%), lack of trust in AI-generated decisions (181, 69.1%), and insufficient training (156, 59.5%). Respondents supported AI integration into rheumatology practice, with only 5 (1.9%) not recommending AI tools to colleagues.

Conclusion: Pilot results suggest the rheumatology community is recognizing AI’s transformative potential whilst acknowledging the need for appropriate governance frameworks. AI tools are widely used and positively perceived by rheumatology and pediatric rheumatology professionals. However, concerns about ethics, trust, and training highlight the need for clear guidance and targeted education to support safe integration into clinical and research practice.

Supporting image 1Figure 1 . Geographic distribution of survey respondents


Disclosures: A. Rebollo-Gimenez: None; S. La bella: None; K. Aouad: None; L. Gupta: None; D. Cangelosi: None; T. Högle: None; J. Knitza: GAIA, 2, Vila Health, 12,, 2; N. Ruperto: Abbvie, 2, 6, AClaris, 2, 6, AlfaSigma, 2, 6, Amgen, 2, 6, AstraZeneca, 2, 6, Aurinia, 2, 6, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 2, 6, Bristol Myers and Squibb, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Galapagos, 2, 6, Genentech, 2, 6, Guidepoint, 2, 6, Idorsia, 2, 6, Janssen, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, Roche, 2, 6, Sanofi, 2, 6, Takeda, 2, 6; V. Venerito: None; A. El Maghraoui: None; A. Alongi: None; W. bautista molano: None; D. Bayraktar: None; T. Davergne: None; D. Dey: None; I. Hmamouchi: None; A. Hoens: None; L. Li: None; A. Migowa: None; E. Treemarcki: None; N. Ziade: None; T. Kragstrup: None; D. Benavent: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 6, Janssen, 6, Novartis, 5, 6, Pfizer, 6, Savana, 7, UCB, 2, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Rebollo-Gimenez A, La bella S, Aouad K, Gupta L, Cangelosi D, Högle T, Knitza J, Ruperto N, Venerito V, El Maghraoui A, Alongi A, bautista molano W, Bayraktar D, Davergne T, Dey D, Hmamouchi I, Hoens A, Li L, Migowa A, Treemarcki E, Ziade N, Kragstrup T, Benavent D. Artificial intelligence in adult and paediatric rheumatology practice and research: pilot results from an international survey [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/artificial-intelligence-in-adult-and-paediatric-rheumatology-practice-and-research-pilot-results-from-an-international-survey/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/artificial-intelligence-in-adult-and-paediatric-rheumatology-practice-and-research-pilot-results-from-an-international-survey/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology