ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2283

Arrhythmia Risk in Diabetic Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: Comparative Analysis of IL-6 Inhibitors versus TNF-α Inhibitors

Sila Mateo Faxas1, Godbless Ajenaghughrure2, Gurjot Singh3, Kim Nguyen3, Nirys Mateo Faxas4, Nicole Tejeda5 and Kimberly Ramirez Bonetti6, 1Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, OH, 2Trihealth Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, OH, 3Trihealth Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, 4Independent Author, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, 5Independent Author, Cincinnati, 6Independent Author, cincinnati, OH

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: rheumatoid arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Title: (2265–2289) Rheumatoid Arthritis – Treatment Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Background: Both rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are independently associated with increased cardiovascular risk, including cardiac arrhythmias. The impact of different biologic therapies on arrhythmia risk in patients with both conditions remains unclear. This study evaluates arrhythmia outcomes in RA patients with T2DM treated with IL-6 inhibitors (IL-6i) versus TNF-α inhibitors (TNFi).

Methods:

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX, a global federated health research network. Adult patients with RA and T2DM receiving either IL-6i (sarilumab/tocilizumab) without TNFi or TNFi without IL-6i were identified. After propensity score matching (n=1,579 per cohort), we compared the incidence of various arrhythmias including atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, supraventricular tachycardia, and sick sinus syndrome over a 5-year follow-up period.

Results:

Results: IL-6i treatment was associated with significantly higher risk of ventricular tachycardia compared to TNFi (HR=1.419, 95% CI: 1.006-2.002, p=0.045). Though not statistically significant, there were trends toward increased risk with IL-6i for atrial fibrillation (HR=1.104, 95% CI: 0.894-1.365, p=0.357), supraventricular tachycardia (HR=1.138, 95% CI: 0.767-1.688, p=0.521), and ventricular fibrillation (HR=1.628, 95% CI: 0.964-2.747, p=0.066). Notably, the need for pacemaker implantation was higher in the IL-6i group (HR=1.394, 95% CI: 1.006-1.933, p=0.045). The 5-year arrhythmia-free survival rate was lower in IL-6i-treated patients compared to TNFi-treated patients (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Conclusions: In RA patients with comorbid T2DM, treatment with IL-6i was associated with higher risk of cardiac arrhythmias, particularly ventricular tachycardia, compared to TNFi therapy. These findings suggest that TNFi may offer a more favorable cardiac safety profile in this high-risk population. Clinicians should consider arrhythmia risk when selecting biologic therapy for patients with both RA and T2DM, and closer cardiac monitoring may be warranted for those receiving IL-6i.


Disclosures: S. Mateo Faxas: None; G. Ajenaghughrure: None; G. Singh: None; K. Nguyen: None; N. Mateo Faxas: None; N. Tejeda: None; K. Ramirez Bonetti: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mateo Faxas S, Ajenaghughrure G, Singh G, Nguyen K, Mateo Faxas N, Tejeda N, Ramirez Bonetti K. Arrhythmia Risk in Diabetic Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: Comparative Analysis of IL-6 Inhibitors versus TNF-α Inhibitors [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/arrhythmia-risk-in-diabetic-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-comparative-analysis-of-il-6-inhibitors-versus-tnf-%ce%b1-inhibitors/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/arrhythmia-risk-in-diabetic-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-comparative-analysis-of-il-6-inhibitors-versus-tnf-%ce%b1-inhibitors/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology