ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2153

Arrest Of Progressive Loss Of Vibratory Perception In Knee Osteoarthritis: Effects Of a 48 Week Biomechanical Intervention

Najia Shakoor1, Roy H. Lidtke2, Louis F. Fogg3, Laura E. Thorp4, Markus A. Wimmer5, Rachel A. Mikolaitis2 and Joel A. Block2, 1Rheumatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, 2Section of Rheumatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, 3Department of Nursing, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, 4Anatomy and Cell Biology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, 5Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biomechanics, foot wear and osteoarthritis, Neuromuscular Mechanisms

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Osteoarthritis - Clinical Aspects II: Symptoms and Therapeutics in Osteoarthritis.

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:   Somatosensory function has been shown to be altered in knee osteoarthritis (OA); for example, we previously observed that in knee OA there are generalized deficits of vibratory perception in the upper and the lower extremity compared to age-matched controls, though it remains unclear whether these deficits worsen during the course of OA. Biomechanical interventions that reduce dynamic loading during gait are promising strategies that may improve pain and retard disease progression, though their relationship to somatosensory function is unknown. Here, we present data from a double-blind randomized controlled study of a flexible shoe (“mobility” shoe), which has previously been shown to reduce medial compartment knee loading, on the progression of vibratory deficits in participants with knee OA. 

Methods:   Participants were enrolled in a randomized controlled study of a flexible-soled shoe (“mobility” shoe) vs an identical appearing “control” shoe with stiffer sole.  This was a 6-month primary study and participants had the opportunity to continue for an additional 18 months.  Here we evaluate the interim 48 week data.  All participants had radiographic (KL grades ≥ 2) and symptomatic (at least 30/100 mm on VAS) medial compartment knee OA.  In those with bilateral OA, the most symptomatic side was considered the “affected” side.  Investigators and participants were blinded to shoe assignment.  Vibratory perception threshold (VPT) was measured using a biothesiometer that provided vibratory stimulation at multiple predetermined anatomic sites, including an upper extremity site.  VPT was recorded as the first sensation of vibration (volts).

Results: 50 participants were randomized, 22 to the active “mobility” shoe and 28 to the control group.  24 participants continued with the study extension, 11 in the “mobility” group (7 female, mean age 59±4 years) and 13 in the control group (10 female, mean age 52±9 years).   Changes in VPT at the various sites are summarized in Table 1.  VPT worsened significantly over 48 weeks at each site in the control group except the medial ankle, but there were no significant changes in the mobility group.   Changes in VPT were not correlated with baseline age or with pain improvement.  

Conclusion:   Lower extremity OA is known to be associated with altered somatosensory function, including vibratory perception deficits.  Here we demonstrate that in knee OA, vibratory perception worsens significantly over time. In addition, alteration in footwear with sustained mechanical unloading during gait appears to arrest that progression of vibratory loss both in the affected lower extremity as well as in the upper extremity in such patients. The clinical significance and relationship of these findings to OA disease progression need better elucidation in future studies.

 Table

 

Mobility group

Control group

 

Baseline VPT (volts)

48 week VPT (volts)

Effect size

p value for difference

Baseline VPT (volts)

48 week VPT (volts)

Effect size

p value for difference

1st MTP

15.1±10.0

15.4±7.9

-0.03

0.91

11.2±5.7

13.4±6.1

-0.73

0.02

Medial ankle

18.6±8.2

18.1±5.0

0.07

0.81

15.7±6.9

17.0±6.9

-0.21

0.45

Lateral ankle

19.6±11.0

16.6±4.0

0.29

0.36

14.3±6.3

17±6.2

-0.59

0.05

Medial knee

18.1±8.8

17.5±5.7

0.07

0.81

15.4±7.3

19.0±10.1

-0.73

0.02

Lateral  knee

17.2±6.0

18.5±6.5

-0.21

0.50

15.6±7.1

19.8±8.8

-0.60

0.05

Tibial tuberosity

15.8±5.3

17.3±6.6

-0.26

0.40

13.3±4.8

16.2±4.7

-0.65

0.03

Radial styloid

9.0±1.4

9.3±2.0

-0.14

0.64

7.1±2.3

8.2±1.8

-0.69

0.03

 


Disclosure:

N. Shakoor,

Dr. Comfort shoe,

7;

R. H. Lidtke,

Dr. Comfort,

7,

Dr. Comfort,

5;

L. F. Fogg,
None;

L. E. Thorp,
None;

M. A. Wimmer,
None;

R. A. Mikolaitis,
None;

J. A. Block,

Ferring, Inc.,

5,

PL Pharma, Inc.,

9.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/arrest-of-progressive-loss-of-vibratory-perception-in-knee-osteoarthritis-effects-of-a-48-week-biomechanical-intervention/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology