ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 920

Area-Level Predictors of Medication Nonadherence Among U.S. Medicaid Beneficiaries with Lupus: A Multilevel Study

Candace H. Feldman1, Karen H. Costenbader2, Daniel H. Solomon3, S.V. Subramanian4 and Ichiro Kawachi5, 1Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 2Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 3Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 4Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 5Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Compliance, Lupus, race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Healthcare Disparities in Rheumatology

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Among lupus patients, adherence to hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), the backbone of therapy, remains suboptimal. Individual-level factors, including younger age, poverty, and black race, have been associated with HCQ nonadherence. However contextual factors including neighborhood poverty and concentration of healthcare resources have not been examined. We constructed multilevel models to investigate whether zip code, county and state-level characteristics were associated with HCQ nonadherence.

Methods: We identified individuals with SLE enrolled in Medicaid (2000-2010) from 28 U.S. states using a previously defined algorithm. We included new users of HCQ (no use in ≥6 months) with ≥12 months of continuous enrollment with complete drug dispensing data following HCQ initiation. Adherence was measured over this 12-month period using the proportion of days covered (PDC) and defined as ≥80%. We identified individual-level characteristics (demographics, medications, comorbidities) from Medicaid data. We obtained zip code, county and state-level characteristics (percent of the population below the Federal poverty level (FPL), educational attainment and percent black population) from the American Community Survey. Health resource data (per capita hospitals, physicians, pharmacies and health professional shortage areas) were obtained from Area Health Resources Files. We used four-level hierarchical multivariable logistic regression models with Markov Chain Monte Carlo procedures to examine odds (OR [95% credible interval]) of adherence vs. nonadherence.

Results: Among 10,268 HCQ initiators with SLE residing within 4,930 zip codes in 1,414 counties in 28 states, 15% were adherent. After adjusting for individual-level characteristics, we observed lower odds of adherence across zip codes with higher percentages of black residents (highest tertile OR 0.81 [0.68-0.96] vs. lowest) (Table). The association remained after controlling for zip code percent below FPL and educational attainment. Odds of adherence were higher in counties with the greatest number of hospitals vs. the fewest (OR 1.32 [1.08-1.60]), and lower in health professional shortage areas (OR 0.86 [0.75-1.00]). There was no association with county-level per capita number of physicians or pharmacists. There was minimal variation in adherence by geographic area; the greatest was between states (1.4%).

Conclusion: Among Medicaid beneficiaries with lupus, after accounting for individual-level factors, we observed reduced odds of HCQ adherence in areas with higher percentages of black residents, fewer hospitals, and shortages of health professionals. Further studies are needed to assess whether racial residential segregation and poorer availability of high-quality medical care may contribute to racial differences in HCQ nonadherence and in turn, to disparities in lupus outcomes.


Table: Multilevel hierarchical logistic regression models examining the odds (OR with 95% credible interval) of adherence (PDC≥80%) vs. nonadherence among 10,268 individuals with lupus within 4,930 zip codes in 1,414 counties in 28 states

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Model 4

Model 5

Zip code-level fixed effect variables

    % Black Population

       Tertile 2

0.84 (0.73-0.98)

0.85 (0.73-0.97)

0.87 (0.74-1.02)

0.84 (0.74-1.00)

0.85 (0.74-0.98)

       Tertile 3

0.81 (0.68-0.96)

0.79 (0.66-0.94)

0.83 (0.69-1.00)

0.81 (0.68-0.98)

0.82 (0.70-0.96)

    % Below Federal Poverty Level

       Tertile 2

1.02 (0.87-1.19)

       Tertile 3

1.09 (0.93-1.28)

County-level fixed effect variables

    Hospitals per capita

       Tertile 2

1.14 (0.99-1.31)

       Tertile 3

1.32 (1.08-1.60)

    Health Professional Shortage Area

       Partial

0.82 (0.64-1.03)

       Whole

0.86 (0.75-1.00)

State-level fixed effect variable

    Rheumatologists per capita

       Tertile 2

1.22 (0.91-1.60)

       Tertile 3

1.15 (0.87-1.47)

In all models, tertile 1 is the reference. All models are adjusted for individual-level age, sex, race/ethnicity, SLE risk-adjustment index, lupus nephritis, diabetes mellitus, antidepressant use, corticosteroid use, immunosuppressive medication use, number of lupus-related lab tests, number of medications, healthcare utilization, obesity, smoking and calendar year. All models account for zip code, county and state-level random effects. County and state-level models are adjusted for all individual-level characteristics as well as zip code-level percent black (Model 1). Model 1 was chosen from Models 1-2, and an additional model including educational attainment, because it had the lowest deviance information criterion (DIC). Models 3-5 included healthcare resource variables separately due to collinearity.


Disclosure: C. H. Feldman, None; K. H. Costenbader, None; D. H. Solomon, None; S. V. Subramanian, None; I. Kawachi, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Feldman CH, Costenbader KH, Solomon DH, Subramanian SV, Kawachi I. Area-Level Predictors of Medication Nonadherence Among U.S. Medicaid Beneficiaries with Lupus: A Multilevel Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/area-level-predictors-of-medication-nonadherence-among-u-s-medicaid-beneficiaries-with-lupus-a-multilevel-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/area-level-predictors-of-medication-nonadherence-among-u-s-medicaid-beneficiaries-with-lupus-a-multilevel-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology