Session Information
Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session
Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM
Background/Purpose: Among lupus patients, adherence to hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), the backbone of therapy, remains suboptimal. Individual-level factors, including younger age, poverty, and black race, have been associated with HCQ nonadherence. However contextual factors including neighborhood poverty and concentration of healthcare resources have not been examined. We constructed multilevel models to investigate whether zip code, county and state-level characteristics were associated with HCQ nonadherence.
Methods: We identified individuals with SLE enrolled in Medicaid (2000-2010) from 28 U.S. states using a previously defined algorithm. We included new users of HCQ (no use in ≥6 months) with ≥12 months of continuous enrollment with complete drug dispensing data following HCQ initiation. Adherence was measured over this 12-month period using the proportion of days covered (PDC) and defined as ≥80%. We identified individual-level characteristics (demographics, medications, comorbidities) from Medicaid data. We obtained zip code, county and state-level characteristics (percent of the population below the Federal poverty level (FPL), educational attainment and percent black population) from the American Community Survey. Health resource data (per capita hospitals, physicians, pharmacies and health professional shortage areas) were obtained from Area Health Resources Files. We used four-level hierarchical multivariable logistic regression models with Markov Chain Monte Carlo procedures to examine odds (OR [95% credible interval]) of adherence vs. nonadherence.
Results: Among 10,268 HCQ initiators with SLE residing within 4,930 zip codes in 1,414 counties in 28 states, 15% were adherent. After adjusting for individual-level characteristics, we observed lower odds of adherence across zip codes with higher percentages of black residents (highest tertile OR 0.81 [0.68-0.96] vs. lowest) (Table). The association remained after controlling for zip code percent below FPL and educational attainment. Odds of adherence were higher in counties with the greatest number of hospitals vs. the fewest (OR 1.32 [1.08-1.60]), and lower in health professional shortage areas (OR 0.86 [0.75-1.00]). There was no association with county-level per capita number of physicians or pharmacists. There was minimal variation in adherence by geographic area; the greatest was between states (1.4%).
Conclusion: Among Medicaid beneficiaries with lupus, after accounting for individual-level factors, we observed reduced odds of HCQ adherence in areas with higher percentages of black residents, fewer hospitals, and shortages of health professionals. Further studies are needed to assess whether racial residential segregation and poorer availability of high-quality medical care may contribute to racial differences in HCQ nonadherence and in turn, to disparities in lupus outcomes.
Table: Multilevel hierarchical logistic regression models examining the odds (OR with 95% credible interval) of adherence (PDC≥80%) vs. nonadherence among 10,268 individuals with lupus within 4,930 zip codes in 1,414 counties in 28 states |
|||||
|
Model 1
|
Model 2
|
Model 3
|
Model 4
|
Model 5
|
Zip code-level fixed effect variables |
|||||
% Black Population |
|
|
|
|
|
Tertile 2
|
0.84 (0.73-0.98)
|
0.85 (0.73-0.97)
|
0.87 (0.74-1.02) |
0.84 (0.74-1.00)
|
0.85 (0.74-0.98)
|
Tertile 3
|
0.81 (0.68-0.96)
|
0.79 (0.66-0.94)
|
0.83 (0.69-1.00)
|
0.81 (0.68-0.98)
|
0.82 (0.70-0.96)
|
% Below Federal Poverty Level |
|
|
|
|
|
Tertile 2
|
|
1.02 (0.87-1.19) |
|
|
|
Tertile 3
|
|
1.09 (0.93-1.28) |
|
|
|
County-level fixed effect variables |
|||||
Hospitals per capita |
|
|
|
|
|
Tertile 2 |
|
|
1.14 (0.99-1.31) |
|
|
Tertile 3 |
|
|
1.32 (1.08-1.60)
|
|
|
Health Professional Shortage Area |
|
|
|
|
|
Partial |
|
|
|
0.82 (0.64-1.03) |
|
Whole |
|
|
|
0.86 (0.75-1.00)
|
|
State-level fixed effect variable |
|||||
Rheumatologists per capita |
|
|
|
|
|
Tertile 2 |
|
|
|
|
1.22 (0.91-1.60) |
Tertile 3 |
|
|
|
|
1.15 (0.87-1.47) |
In all models, tertile 1 is the reference. All models are adjusted for individual-level age, sex, race/ethnicity, SLE risk-adjustment index, lupus nephritis, diabetes mellitus, antidepressant use, corticosteroid use, immunosuppressive medication use, number of lupus-related lab tests, number of medications, healthcare utilization, obesity, smoking and calendar year. All models account for zip code, county and state-level random effects. County and state-level models are adjusted for all individual-level characteristics as well as zip code-level percent black (Model 1). Model 1 was chosen from Models 1-2, and an additional model including educational attainment, because it had the lowest deviance information criterion (DIC). Models 3-5 included healthcare resource variables separately due to collinearity.
|
To cite this abstract in AMA style:
Feldman CH, Costenbader KH, Solomon DH, Subramanian SV, Kawachi I. Area-Level Predictors of Medication Nonadherence Among U.S. Medicaid Beneficiaries with Lupus: A Multilevel Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/area-level-predictors-of-medication-nonadherence-among-u-s-medicaid-beneficiaries-with-lupus-a-multilevel-study/. Accessed .« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/area-level-predictors-of-medication-nonadherence-among-u-s-medicaid-beneficiaries-with-lupus-a-multilevel-study/